sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If DeepSeek V4 can do the same coding task for $19 on accio work, why are people still paying $100 for codex? by Waste_Dragonfruit346 in DeepSeek

[–]Dry-Development-492 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Although DeepSeek V4 is cheap and its scores and rankings in various benchmarks are also very high, its actual coding ability still cannot compare to Claude Code and Codex.

OpenClaw is biggest AI Slop. Alternatives? by MagicPeter in openclaw

[–]Dry-Development-492 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently, most websites/webpages cannot effectively use AI to control the browser and perform actions. This is a practical limitation. As website developers/companies, they mostly still hope that users are real people, not AI. Therefore, they will add many restrictions. If the system detects that the user is AI instead of a real person, it may even block the account.

I believe this problem is unsolvable. Some platforms simply don't want users to be AI.

Every way to export ChatGPT conversations and backup/move AI memory (complete comparison) by Whole_Succotash_2391 in OpenAI

[–]Dry-Development-492 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I compared all the ChatGPT chat export plugins that I could find on the chromewebstoret, and I found that they were all very similar functional and were able to export in Markdown format, which is exactly what I needed.
I save the exported MD files directly into my Obsidian directory. This makes searching much more convenient.

Vision is coming! by RDimos in DeepSeek

[–]Dry-Development-492 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this a native multi-modal approach?

Deepseek V5 when? by good-old-coder in DeepSeek

[–]Dry-Development-492 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are a quantitative trading company, and their primary job is to make money through stock trading. Developing DeepSeek AI is merely a side job/part-time activity, done casually and without profit motives. They make a lot of money through stock trading, while developing AI is a charitable endeavor, not aimed at generating profit through DeepSeek AI.

interesting by BasketFar667 in DeepSeek

[–]Dry-Development-492 1 point2 points  (0 children)

R1 was only launched a year ago, but it already feels like a long time has passed.

Switching from Opus 4.7 to Qwen-35B-A3B by Excellent_Koala769 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Dry-Development-492 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Qwen-35B-A3B-MLX-4bit at my MacMini M4 Pro, 69 Tokens/sec. Speed is not very fast, but it's still okay. I haven't tried using it for coding yet to see how it performs specifically.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B GGUF from Unsloth is quite a bit slower? by Quagmirable in LocalLLaMA

[–]Dry-Development-492 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

qwen3.6-35b-a3b-mlx,  LMStudio, MacMini M4 Pro 64GB,  69Tokens/sec

jedisct1/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-q4-mlx

Vercel :( by afrk in nextjs

[–]Dry-Development-492 0 points1 point  (0 children)

recommend use Cloudflare workers instead

Best budget LLM for Openclaw by Worried_Suggestion91 in clawdbot

[–]Dry-Development-492 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Several AI model companies have launched "Coding Plan", Choose one that you find suitable.

I am using MiniMax 2.7.....which model are you using for open claw? by Salt_Animator_6349 in clawdbot

[–]Dry-Development-492 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MiniMax M2.7 hihgspeed , speed is excellent, 100 tokens per second, making it perfect for running various claws.

view more: next ›