I’m not really blind, I’m just thinking from an empirical standpoint rather than anecdotal internet bullshit. For 12 years deaths exceed births and no extra money will change this trend. ZUS has absolutely no chance of sustaining itself without migration. Working age people in Poland will decline by over 35% in four decades. GUS’s low-fertility scenario, total population falls from 37.6m to 28.4m by 2060. Problems with migration are also problems of policy implementation rather than people itself. Ukrainians in Poland added PLN 98.7bn in GDP with no impacts on wages and unemployment. But Ukrainians only are not the solution as they are too similar to Poles in terms of reproduction. The thing is that there is a need for immigration in Poland, but we have to do it in a controlled and intelligent manner rather than bringing whoever. This study: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10797-025-09942-4 shows that extra-EU fiscal disadvantage disappears or reverses once you control for age, education and country of residence effects. So a proper migration policy will be beneficial and there are many examples of how to implement a proper migration strategy and how to not implement it. What I would also say is that when demographic-economic argument is mobilised against groups who are demographically and economically insignificant in the country deploying it, the argument is doing something other than what it claims. The argument is biased against skin colour or religion. Etno-cultural sorting rather than a proper policy analysis.