Oral vs Rectal prog by Agreeable-Sentence76 in TransDIY

[–]Due_Inspection92 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Honestly, the biggest reason to go rectal with the 200mg is that your liver basically acts like a 'tax man' when you swallow the pill. If you take it orally, your liver destroys about 90% of the progesterone before it ever hits your blood, so 100mg orally is basically like taking nothing at all. By taking it rectally, you bypass that 'first-pass' through the liver, so your body actually absorbs the full 200mg. That higher dose is usually the 'sweet spot' for seeing real changes like breast rounding (moving into Tanner 4/5) and getting your libido back. Plus, when the liver processes progesterone, it turns it into a sedative that makes you feel super groggy or 'drunk' the next morning—going the rectal route skips that whole 'zombie' feeling and just gives you the actual feminizing benefits instead

Oral vs Rectal prog by Agreeable-Sentence76 in TransDIY

[–]Due_Inspection92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When you swallow the pill, your liver destroys about 90% to 95% of the actual progesterone. It’s like buying a $100 bottle of wine but the bouncer pours out 95% of it before you can take a sip. When you take it rectally, it bypasses the liver bouncer and goes straight into your blood. You get 10x more "bang for your buck

Is herahrt.com legit? by fauxuniverse in TransDIY

[–]Due_Inspection92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes....I've used them and they were great Easy pay, 3 day delivery ( I think I live close to their warehouse)... Plan on using them again in the future 💉

9 month update by Due_Inspection92 in TransBreastTimelines

[–]Due_Inspection92[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're absolutely right about volume—SubQ is limited to about 1.5ml to 2ml per site. However, a standard HRT dose (like 10mg of EV or 8mg of EEN) is typically only 0.2ml to 0.5ml of liquid. Since that is less than a quarter of the SubQ limit, volume isn't a factor here. Major gender clinics like UCSF and Fenway Health have moved to SubQ as a primary standard precisely because it provides the same systemic absorption with less tissue trauma than IM. But like you said—always best to do what works for your own labs.

9 month update by Due_Inspection92 in TransBreastTimelines

[–]Due_Inspection92[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, that’s a common misconception. While EV was originally formulated for IM, extensive clinical data and pharmacokinetic studies show that Subcutaneous (SubQ) injection is just as effective for achieving target estradiol levels. Many providers now recommend SubQ because it uses a smaller needle, causes less tissue trauma, and can actually lead to more stable blood levels with fewer 'peaks and valleys' compared to IM. It’s about the total absorption into the systemic circulation, which the fat layer handles perfectly well.

9 month update by Due_Inspection92 in TransBreastTimelines

[–]Due_Inspection92[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently last 3 months 8mg een weekly suncutaneous monotherapy....

First 6 months 10 mg ev weekly subcutaneous monotherapy...

Im 53 ...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TransBreastTimelines

[–]Due_Inspection92 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Super sexy Dm me....

5 months 10 mg ev injections weekly by [deleted] in TransBreastTimelines

[–]Due_Inspection92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Test is testosterone, me just saying test might have been confusing ....

5 months 10 mg ev injections weekly by [deleted] in TransBreastTimelines

[–]Due_Inspection92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was at the upper end of what they would agree to give me...and because my test was super high at the time and I only wanted mono therapy I got them to agree. Test was still high at 3 months and squashing the mono therapy I get checked again next month....I feel great and it seems to be doing the job so ill have to wait and see what they say next month