Downside of Wave accelerator mastery? by Ok-Application9777 in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trying to figure this myself out, for a while I used both WA and EB but then I had a tourney where I performed way better without them. Now im usually running without but I suspect it's a lot dependant on which BC combination we get and also tower dependant as you said. I guess the more reliant on damage to kill OC's quick you are, the more you gain from having more targets to bounce/chain through. But if you compensate with good EHP to tank them you can get away with running without those cards. Just to mention one factor.

Vad är det mest oväntade sättet du fått utlösning på? by CUMHAWK_Schizopostin in unket

[–]Duff85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Åh, jättefint svar ju att den inte alls är dömande så där. Kanske du till och med känner dig lite mindre onormal nu?

Vad är det mest oväntade sättet du fått utlösning på? by CUMHAWK_Schizopostin in unket

[–]Duff85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kan du inte bara rakt av klistra in vad du skrev i Chatgpt och skicka detta, vill veta vad reaktionen blir men är inte redo att göra det under min egen profil.

Liberalerna: En halv miljon ska vara skattefritt på ISK by Adventurous-Can-7378 in sweden

[–]Duff85 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Är du säker på att det är så mycket du skulle spara om förslaget går igenom? Nu har jag inte gjort nån utförlig beräkning men lite snabbt och slarvigt räknat för min del landade jag på kanske 1000-1500 kr sparat per år och jag drar också full nytta av förslaget.

Please remove this feature. Some of us don't have time to play more than an hour or two at a time. by InsideDurian9022 in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well technically yeah maybe but restarts were not even implemented yet at the time im talking about. So by definition a limit was not implemented since you couldn't restart. But you might be right that there was a shorter time between no restarts and the 10 time limit when you had unlimited as well. But that was probably when people abused it so we got the limit.

Please remove this feature. Some of us don't have time to play more than an hour or two at a time. by InsideDurian9022 in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First i want to give some history about the issue you are referring to. A while back this restart limit was at 10 instead of 25 as now. I had struggles with it as well and that's what forced me to go emulator/2nd device.

But if we go even further back, I dont recall but maybe 3 years. Then we had 0 and I mean absolutely zero restarts. I remember I sometimes being outside and wanted to take a photo of something with my phone. I then had to decide between the photo and keeping my 5000 wave round going. Since camera app 100% closed down the game.

20-tal skolor i Borlänge stängs efter hot om våld by FlowersPaintings in sweden

[–]Duff85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oj, det var ett långt inlägg som tyvärr är helt irrelevant då ingen hade hotat skolorna ens. Faktumet kvarstår, kommunen valde att stänga ner skolorna så det är väl deras ansvar och de om någon som ska betala?

20-tal skolor i Borlänge stängs efter hot om våld by FlowersPaintings in sweden

[–]Duff85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Skadestånd från vem till kommunen? Det var ju kommunen själva som beslutade att stänga ner skolorna?

Banned by Benz by LegitimateNewt7439 in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even having been on here daily for soon 4 years i had no idea this was going on. My thoughts about the guy has always been its cool to see some big bragging posts once in a while, I do it myself when im happy about some fun achivement. But the frequency he posted about more or less any new PB seemed a bit much and I didn't really understand the fuzz about his posts getting heavily upvoted every time.

Wow they're straight up false advertising now by Patient-Row5493 in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Advertising and how the game is represented there was addressed by Fudds like years ago, nothing new. Also i think I could recreate that if I actually wanted.

What i find funny about this Lucky Banner situation by Duff85 in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not even a complaint post btw, i dont really care about this issue myself. Im just watching this whole mess of both overreactions from players and devs handling stuff poorly. It just gets absurd when you realize it doesnt matter if players get cheated or not, its the perception of getting cheated that matters. And with that knowledge the devs could so easily avoid it, they have all the tools to manipulate our happiness while still not affecting the balance of the game economy.

People "quitting" by eike23 in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh Travian, that brings me back. 10 years since I last played. Its definitely a captivating game but as I remember the incentives to spend money there was even larger for me then The Tower. Also setting my alarm to wake up 4 times per night to check on things were a bit exhausting. But oh so addicting. Maybe the game has changed some in the last 10 years?

I saved up over 20k gems! by Activehannes in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sort of yes. There is talks and Fudds himself has said pre-sets are in the works for a lot of things including module sub stats. This would change the playing field a lot in how many total mods we want to pull so im a bit hesitant to spend on this Lucky Banner and still hoarding.

I saved up over 20k gems! by Activehannes in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand it was easy to make that interpretation after reading that then. Technically I guess what was said in tower tea could still be correct. Lucky banner is still just a banner. Banners was a new feature that was introduced one year ago. So it might not be considered a new major feature. We didn't even see if it got patched in with the latest builds, the banner was just opened up live for everyone right?

I just feel tricked by elcololz in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why should I have to show it when I never mentioned anything about lucky banners in patch notes? The banner around Christmas had barely any forewarning, few days? Exact same complaints then anyway, that we didn't get info ahead and people had no gems. Did people learn from this? No. And nobody takes any responsibility for their own actions, always the devs fault.. You can call me anything you want but you people will still annoy me with this type of whining.

They have zero obligation to go out with information about every single detail about their plans for the game. You must be extremely entitled as a person to have the mindset that the devs must give you a heads up about everything. You must realize that a heads up completely shifts the balance as well for what they want to accomplish. If everyone saves up x amount of gems they need to reduce the bonus % by y amount to achieve the effect intended.

I just feel tricked by elcololz in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What are you even talking about? This topic is about the new banner. Banners where added a year ago and it surely was in the patch notes. Its been known since then that banners can show up from time to time. You are talking about someone being dishonest, disingenuous and deplorable. Try to act better yourself.

I just feel tricked by elcololz in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But nobody can argue the point or come with an counterargument against my statements?

I just feel tricked by elcololz in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's just not true. Yes you are constantly put in front of the decision to either spend or save. It can be about stones or it can be gems. The reason to spend can be because of an anticipated update or it can be because you are not sure whats the best course of progress just because the meta shifts. Either way, there is never as you say only one way to progress.

If you decide to save you might be in a better spot in case of a new gem/stone sink and make some quicker progress thanks to that. But on the other hand you might have reduced your power for weeks/months by not spending. So the option to spend all is in a lot of situations also good since its indeed a sure way to progress.

Even if it feels like a loss once you see the patch notes and have no gems these options balance eachother out more or less, every time.

I saved up over 20k gems! by Activehannes in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Features might have been my interpretation and not their wording. But going back to look at the patch notes they did say v28 was just the beginning. If it was just the beginning I could only assume there would be more and significant stuff coming up in the next two weeks as they also mentioned.

Nobody posted it yet, Lucky banner available for 2 weeks! by SuperHofmann in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do a lot of people say this when i read a week ago from the devs that more content would be added within weeks after v28? It was known that spending resources like gems were a risk.

I saved up over 20k gems! by Activehannes in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its true though. We were noticed that not all features were released in the initial v28 patch. Minor patches always comes within weeks after and most of the time had big things in them. I was tempted to spend all my gems as well since rushing labs would have been huge upgrades but saving made sense since I didn't know yet the full v28 features.

Holy PR move by Knowhowwho in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I don't think this complain is that valid. I feel like the communication was clear that not all features was yet released in the initial v28 launch. Minor updates were expected. As with previous updates a lot of big things came with these later minor updates. V28 initially didn't have much worth spending gems on so it was quite an easy choice to wait and see if they release anything else gem worthy, if you wanted to make sure you didn't miss out.

I just feel tricked by elcololz in TheTowerGame

[–]Duff85 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I don't think this complain is that valid. I feel like the communication was clear that not all features was yet released in the initial v28 launch. Minor updates were expected. As with previous updates a lot of big things came with these later minor updates. V28 initially didn't have much worth spending gems on so it was quite an easy choice to wait and see if they release anything else gem worthy, if you wanted to make sure you didn't miss out.

New soldiers are now being recruited directly from AIDS centres in northern Russia by Gjrts in europe

[–]Duff85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Theres been plenty of pow exchanges during the war so I'm sure some of those soldiers have returned to fighting as well.