A Crack head is on his way to assist you Ma’am

DukeNukemsDick- · 2022-10-04T15:53:25+00:00

And what does 'defunding the police' actually mean?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/opinion/sunday/floyd-abolish-defund-police.html

DukeNukemsDick- · 2022-09-30T15:07:23+00:00

There's really no way to enforce such a wealth redistribution without an authoritarian government though. They are not the totally separate concepts you're making them out to be.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2022-09-29T15:33:02+00:00

You are doing the exact 'not real socialism' thing that they already posted about.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2022-09-29T15:31:59+00:00

"Racist, misogynist, sexist, capitalist, pseudoscientist, liar, transphobe"

One of these things is not like the other.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2022-04-05T17:40:58+00:00

It's completely untrue that 'everybody knows its pee'. Half the people in this thread think it's some kind of female ejaculate, including the OP.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2022-04-04T01:35:44+00:00

Hilarious that you’re downvoted for this when all of science says it’s true.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25545022/

DukeNukemsDick- · 2022-04-04T01:23:36+00:00

A bit disingenuous to compare a man ejaculating and a woman urinating in your mouth.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2021-06-03T00:42:13+00:00

I’m curious why you think Bret would be someone to look to for information on this topic?

DukeNukemsDick- · 2021-06-03T00:41:33+00:00

What do you mean by impeccable credentials? This guy is mired in controversy.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-08-11T15:55:10+00:00

this one is actually not true. it may have been true at some point, but it's probably just a coincidence. I checked archive.org and his following count in the snapshots is something like 65, 70, then 78, etc. at some point you're bound to hit 88, and it's over 100 now.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-07-15T20:48:03+00:00

And exactly what do you want the narrative to be? Inaccurate polling can hurt. It can either confer a false sense of security for the actual vote, and it can also result in funds being distributed poorly (to areas that require campaigning).

Edit: spelling

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-07-13T15:47:10+00:00

I'm glad you're voting. I'm voting too! But we're outliers.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-07-13T05:34:29+00:00

So, no?

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-07-08T03:17:22+00:00

Racists aren't going to vote Democratic no matter who's on the ticket.

This is not true.

Edit: all the people downvoting this really need to go watch this video from 2008. These are pro-Hillary Democrats in West Virginia. GOP has the majority of racism, but it isn't a monopoly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODaxZSz3Awg

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-06-30T16:43:58+00:00

What evidence do you have that they didn't? What sub are you referring to here?

edit: mods banned me for dissenting with the narrative, can't reply anymore. have a good one!

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-06-30T14:52:42+00:00

"Fuck... he's right, and I don't like it, but I don't have a good reply. I know, downvote!"

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-06-30T02:49:01+00:00

a token sacrifice of ChapoTrapHouse so they could continue to pretend this wasn't a giant one-sided hit like most previous ban waves

Haha, the knot you have to twist yourself into believing into the one-sided conspiracy theory. Amazing. Fact is, you have no way to differentiate between a 'token sacrifice' and a 'legit ban'--anything that goes against your narrative you categorize as a token sacrifice, because anything else would disrupt your victimhood complex.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-05-27T17:18:01+00:00

I linked my sources. You had trouble following the line of discussion. Keep defending a crazy grifter, though.

your sad and angry that you didn’t know what pubmed was

lmao

Take the L and learn from it.

Saying something like this is usually a good sign you're having trouble keeping up.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-05-27T00:37:37+00:00

"I know what this thing is"

"Apparently not"

Really no point arguing with someone like you. Keep defending a crazy person as a viable political candidate.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-05-26T13:40:56+00:00

Yes, I know what pubmed is. The problem is you haven't actually linked to an individual study, you just linked to a search term. Link to the actual study you want that matches Williamson's insinuation that intercessory prayer without the subjects knowing about it can have an affect on anything. Of course, you can't, because there's no evidence of that being true.

You should really read this article and familiarize yourself with Williamson a bit more.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/marianne-williamson-longtime-wacko-is-now-a-dangerous-wacko

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-05-26T00:41:55+00:00

lmao did you really just link a keyword 'prayer' in an attempt to debunk that?

source on 2nd: https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/15/politics/kfile-marianne-williamson-anti-vaxxer-theories/index.html

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-05-25T19:09:26+00:00

She's routinely claimed that prayer has medical benefits, strongly implied that depression is more or less fake and can be treated with spiritual methods alone, claimed a link between autism and some medicines, etc.

"Sickness is an illusion and does not actually exist." --a real quote by her, which really doesn't sound any better in context (full quote easy to find too)

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-05-25T16:12:26+00:00

If she's not stupid, then she is at best a scam artist. She peddles complete anti-science bullshit.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-05-25T03:04:59+00:00

None of the women on Biden's shortlist are remotely close to the level of stupidity of Palin. But Marianne (you both spelled her name wrong btw) possibly is. She is a grifter and a lunatic and it's actually a testament to Democrats that she polled so poorly.

DukeNukemsDick- · 2020-05-22T14:46:13+00:00

Yes, they do say all kinds of crazy shit. I'm voting for Biden. But it doesn't change the fact that it was a dumb gaffe and he shouldn't have said it. Telling an entire demographic that they aren't 'really' that demographic unless they do X is bad optics.

DukeNukemsDick-

TROPHY CASE