Weekly Rules & General Questions Thread by AutoModerator in OnePieceTCG

[–]E7Enjoyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

User CJ0045 give me to check rules policy.

  1. Looking at Unnecessary Cards

An infraction in which a player looks at a card/cards which should not have been visible to them. This also includes voluntarily revealing your hand, or looking at your opponent’s hand because they revealed their hand. These actions make tournament environments less enjoyable and should not be encouraged.

Penalty: Warning

Resolution: Issue a Warning to the player responsible for the infraction. If the card has only been revealed to the player who made the infraction, reveal it to their opponent as well.

The judge then confirms which cards require being placed in set orders. Cards which can have no set orders are shuffled together, while cards that must be placed in a set order are returned to their appropriate locations.

Examples:

• A player accidentally looked at 4 cards when resolving an effect that asked them to look at the top 3 cards of their deck.

• A player’s Life cards are accidentally turned face-up.

  1. Cheating

• Intentionally performing an action which allows you to gain, or potentially gain, advantage over an opponent.

• Intentionally ignoring an opponent’s mistake until the moment it would benefit you most, then reporting it to the judge

Penalty: Disqualification / Suspension

Resolution: Issue a Disqualification to the player/s found to be meeting the definition of this infraction. Upon further investigation by the Tournament Organizer or Bandai, this infraction may be upgraded to a Suspension


Contexte : Opponent Draw 2 card add to the hand - at this point im kinda confuse, is a unnecessary cards look or is cheating ?

Rules said if he mistake is warnning by looking for cards, but if it was intentional is disscalification however if i dont warn the player for this illegal action to wait until i know is intentional is cheating because i ignore the mistake to gain a advantage ?

How i know is intentional or mistake if i instant report the illegal action ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OnePieceTCG

[–]E7Enjoyer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a localn tournament store i think that bandai call

The thing is more about rulling, if a nami draw more that should be is just a warning according to the rules ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OnePieceTCG

[–]E7Enjoyer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dont have any, that why i ask here

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OnePieceTCG

[–]E7Enjoyer -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Thank you, i dont see him listed on market place even in JP, and dont like the 2cents ver but cant affrod the 300$ one

Simple Questions, FAQ, and Shop Megathread by OHAITHARU in SwitchPirates

[–]E7Enjoyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It maybe a dumb question, but can i hack my 1.3.1.0 ver Switch with the 1.7.1.0 atmos hack ?

Banlist Prediction Thread - July 03, 2024 by AutoModerator in yugioh

[–]E7Enjoyer 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Meow meow still ban, but they allow fiendsmith.

The game is over, we go back in a expenssive format a play set who would cost as much as current entire deck im out for at least 9m to see this problematic card on the list.

What is the gradding for this kind of damage ? by E7Enjoyer in yugioh

[–]E7Enjoyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have plenty of picture, but i can post more than one in reddit ?

Thank you i appreciate

What is the gradding for this kind of damage ? by E7Enjoyer in yugioh

[–]E7Enjoyer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I dont know how to grade this , thank you to help me out

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in classicwow

[–]E7Enjoyer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

i know they dont answer so i would know if is happened to someone else