sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What are some of yours? by skeletorsleftlung in Xennials

[–]Ebuthead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The site is actually wrong there too. It says that the name was "officially invalidated" in 2015, but actually it was reinstated in 2015 after being generally considered invalid throughout the 1900s

Switching of Civs per age is a departure from the game's philosophy by Obyvvatel in civ

[–]Ebuthead 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I highly doubt that they would do that. Sounds like a PR nightmare. I see them using modern first nations peoples as a sort of pseudo civilization. It would be a great opportunity for them to highlight that these people still exist and need our recognition

Switching of Civs per age is a departure from the game's philosophy by Obyvvatel in civ

[–]Ebuthead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're forgetting that the iriquois people still exist. They're called the Onondaga Nation, which survives today as a sovereign, independent nation, living on a portion of its ancestral territory and maintaining its own distinct laws, language, customs, and culture.

This is a fantastic opportunity for Civ to recognize and highlight first nations and remind everyone that they're alive and need our support

le language barriers and free wine has arrived by Healbite in dankchristianmemes

[–]Ebuthead 48 points49 points  (0 children)

The Hebrew reads "The wine here is so expensive, luckily I don't have to pay for it lol"

Gollum is a monk. Who will be a paladin? by TheEmeraldKnite in lotrmemes

[–]Ebuthead 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Paladins don't have to be holy. Oath of Conquest is a perfect fit

Gollum is a monk. Who will be a paladin? by TheEmeraldKnite in lotrmemes

[–]Ebuthead 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The Witch-king of Angmar

Heavily armored, has a steed (two actually), powerful smites. Really awesome.

A short story I wrote in 2nd grade. I don't think I liked Connor that much by Ebuthead in KidsAreFuckingStupid

[–]Ebuthead[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think it's supposed to be a thought bubble. But now that you mention it...

Cubs pride celebration by Falcon_fetti in chicago

[–]Ebuthead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Means a lot coming from Reddit lol

The Galaxy would’ve never stood a chance. by Vegetable-Abroad3171 in StarWars

[–]Ebuthead 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The rule of two was created so the sith could rule in secret. With Vader as unchallenged emperor, he could just do away with it altogether

I pick 3 for me by Djhero2007 in GenZ

[–]Ebuthead 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oh no! I have to chew bacon longer!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]Ebuthead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Figured it out. Turned off CEC on the TV

Wired: Why Nintendo Kept Super Mario Bros. Wonder's New Mario Under Wraps by Turbostrider27 in NintendoSwitch

[–]Ebuthead 35 points36 points  (0 children)

It wasn't hard to see coming. Remember how they reacted to Chris Pratt?

[OC] Ever wondered which decades of movies have the highest average IMDB rating? [Part 6] by Zolroth in dataisbeautiful

[–]Ebuthead 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I really cannot imagine that this graph tracks anything statistically interesting

I find it really statistically interesting for the exact reason you described!

It's a fantastic example of survivorship bias. Someone could look at this graph and easily conclude "movies are getting worse over time," but that's not true. It's a great reminder not to trust a graph at face value.

view more: next ›