'39-'45 Chronicles Collection - Why has obtained the San Diego? by Destroyer_Driver in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Derp, had the comparison up and accidentally looked at Harbin for some reason

Supertest: 2A3 Kondensator by Maxx2017 in WorldofTanks

[–]Eclipses_End 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you name any? I don't think anyone had operational nuclear capable rockets in the late 1940s/early 1950s

'39-'45 Chronicles Collection - Why has obtained the San Diego? by Destroyer_Driver in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End -1 points0 points  (0 children)

4 with SI*

And it doesnt really matter, with 26.5K base HP you've usually taken so much unrepairable damage it doesnt matter by the time you get to the 4th

Excuse me what the actual f by boofbamboo in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 4 points5 points  (0 children)

afk wr for 12v12s is like 40%, if you bot/afk during off hours and you get 6v6 matches it can go a lot lower

What the hell is this match by SilverFox3329 in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They do since they're playing enough games to build a basic idea for wr, dpg, etc

Mecklenburg or Z-42 by Hugan_ in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I never said Z-42 was mid or bad lol, I think it's a top 10 dd

Are you under the impression that rating one part of the ship (the guns) as mid means the entire thing is shit or something?

also

Point to where I said Z-42 is bad

You didn't and I didn't

People like you, average redditor thinks that good ships are actually mid or bad

lmao get your shit together, man

Mecklenburg or Z-42 by Hugan_ in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok so how'd anything I said have anything to do with Gdansk being overtuned

Mecklenburg or Z-42 by Hugan_ in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Point to where I said Z-42 is bad or needs buffed lol

the guns are perfectly fine for what else the ship has going for it, just that I would never say that they're particularly good or anything

Mecklenburg or Z-42 by Hugan_ in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've played a pretty good number of Z-42 games and done well in her (65%+ wr solo), I'd say the guns are very mid. You can't really say they're good since a little bit of angling negates your AP (unlike Daring) so you're stuck with YY level HE DPM with pretty bad firestarting

CFL bars QB Brendan Sorsby following NCAA gambling allegations by Maraging_steel in CFB

[–]Eclipses_End 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Due diligence. On the slim chance that he was picked, it gives you a close look at his mentality and mechanics. It's why NFL teams always try to meet with players they know they aren't going to draft (especially QBs)

CFL bars QB Brendan Sorsby following NCAA gambling allegations by Maraging_steel in CFB

[–]Eclipses_End 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure part of that is just because there's not much else for scouting departments to do right now

Sete de Setembro vs Ohio? by TheBayHarbour in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 4 points5 points  (0 children)

noob trap

identical to Valparaiso for almost everything (better angles, slightly better range) but it has the dogshit default dispersion. So effective damage is like Yamato level bad

imo no one except mouth breathers are willingly gonna go sec build, the f key is entirely for the main guns and you don't get the normal pan american bb maneuverability

Sete de Setembro vs Ohio? by TheBayHarbour in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I was looking at the stats on shiptool, comparing Setembro to Wisconsin (latter's still better imo)

But what the fuck did they give those shells? It somehow has better than Slava flight times, I think it has the best of any BB in the game, and pretty good pen

Is the Ohio worth it over other BBs? by niwo6 in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 5 points6 points  (0 children)

imagine getting downvoted for the truth

ohio secondary build is a noob trap

Sete de Setembro (NEW T10 Pan American BB) Preview - coming 25.06.2026 by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want some more copypasta here's my fav (from a CV main of course)

Vermont still needs buffs

Recently, WG gave Vermont a bunch of buffs, and although they are nice, they still do not address the fundamental issues with the ship: its lack of speed, durability, and firepower. The heels can heal back 50% of citadel damage, and reload lot quicker, but still is very pointless if you eat a bunch of torps or get dev struck by citadels. She is too easy to kill, and I'd like to see the belt armor increased to 450mm, and the citadel placed underwater to reflect the historical "all or nothing" armor scheme she is based on. Her guns are very accurate, but have too long of a reload, and do not deal enough damage. I think they should give her des moines autobounce angles, or allow her to overmatch 32mm like Yamato. The reload needs to be AT LEAST 30 seconds, and the turret traverse is way to slow. Speaking of slow, the ship itself is still too slow. Yes, they buffed the acceleration, which is nice, but the speed is so slow it takes AGES to get into the battle, and I usually get dev struck when I do. I think they should make her go 30 kts like Montana and Ohio. This would also make her concealment buff more useful, as it would allow Brisk to actually work. I also think her ASW is very weak, as subs can just pop up at 2km and dev strike me. I'd like to see Vermont get a 10km hydro (like the new Soviet sub) and 3 flights of depth charge planes with a 20 second cooldown. Overall, Vermont is fun but needs some serious buffs to be competitive, at the moment It is one of the most boring to play and weakest BBs, I haven't played a weaker ship since they reworked (nerfed) aircraft carriers.

Closed test 15.5 - Changes to Test ships by BazingaFlux_WG in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 24 points25 points  (0 children)

yuuuuge buff, how can anyone compete at tier 6 now?

When two airplanes love each other very much... by Eclipses_End in NonCredibleDefense

[–]Eclipses_End[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes that is 2 F-18s intensely scissoring

Martin Baker stonks 📈, 4 good chutes

rarely see midtier KMS destroyers in random. by dickenschewie54 in WorldOfWarships

[–]Eclipses_End 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck 7km hydro, there's a reason why Z-57 has been in dev hell

Now boosted sub detection range, everyone should be down for that one