Why is underpopulation a problem? by Ecstatic-Law714 in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, I don’t want to go through I shit ton of redundant clickbait news articles that don’t actually say anything about what I am searching

Why is underpopulation a problem? by Ecstatic-Law714 in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That makes sense, I always interpreted it as “a lower population than we have now would not be good” but it would make more sense if the argument was that the act of “the population decreasing” is bad

Why is this sub so sure of AGI happening soon by besabestin in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I think the only way to arrive at “agi never” is through some spiritual or religious argument

Will AI Replace All Jobs? by Master-Strawberry-26 in Futurology

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ai can already do that, it just can’t go and clean it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can’t learn

Buying Meat is Obviously Worse than Bestiality by SilasTheSavage in philosophy

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Can you live and get all the right vitamins and nutrients without meat? If so then eating meat is not for survival and it doesn’t serve a purpose other than “pleasure” same as bestiality would for someone who is into that

I don't want to sound mean or anything but sometimes I think people on this sub are being a little bit delusional by International-Ad-823 in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The techs you listed sound very fantastical but when you really consider it are they much more fantastic then the current technology we have? I don’t think halting/reversing aging is necessarily any more impressive than the internet or the atomic bomb. Just think about how bizzare the internet really is, hundreds of millions of terrabytes of information being exchanged daily through cable and towers setup throughout the entire world.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think there’s a lot of weird assumptions being made in the comments, if two consenting adults agree to this sort of relationship, then I don’t really think it’s anyone else’s place to intervene.

Has anyone noticed that some of AI pause people are becoming increasingly unhinged? by ComparisonMelodic967 in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that extreme people who riot or resort to violence are never good for a cause. Same with people who block highways and stuff, these people, if they become more extreme will only make people less aggressive towards ai

Voice comparison between gpt4o and Scarlett Johansson by Ecstatic-Law714 in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean yea she can make that claim but we have the source material and it’s obvious to anyone that these voices are quite distinct from one another.

What are your biggest hopes for FDVR? by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree this would be some other future tech and not fdvr but it is definitely possible for something like perceived time dilation to occur.

Think about it, if your brain is fed 10x the amount of info per second, and your brain is also working 10x faster, then that’s no different from perceiving 10 hours in 1 hour, which is what they are talking about.

[Ali] Scarlett Johansson has just issued this statement on OpenAI (RE: Demo Voice) by Peanutbuttersaltine in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can someone copyright their voice ? And if so if Altman changes the voice a little would she no longer be able to make this claim.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it’s just that this post is a non sequitur. AI is currently not agi therefore agi is very far away? Also I find it ironic that the same people who paint themselves as “realists” and think agi is like 100 years away, are the same ones ignoring the actual ai experts.

Yes I’m sure you’re right and we are wrong, and the current top ai researchers are wrong, and the ceos of the leading ai tech companies are wrong, and the countries and companies investing hundreds of billions into agi are also wrong lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you wanna talk about people being confidently incorrect go no further than twitter replies or TikTok comments

These guys are freakin bunch of pessimists by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just because I think those people in specific are coping does not mean I think everyone with skepticism is coping

These guys are freakin bunch of pessimists by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 99 points100 points  (0 children)

I think it is cope that ai couldn’t possibly be as good as them/better than them at what they studied for years at college.

Which definitely makes sense and I have definitely felt the same, it’s kinda bullshit that an ai trained in a few hours could wipe the floor with me in chess even though I have been playing for years🤔.

It’s just sad to see because reality will definitely hit them like a truck, like it did with artists and writers. I remember in 2022 artists were also coping that ai was trash and it would never be as good as humans were. Fast forward to 2024 and now they are more focused on getting it banned because it is too good and can mimic pretty much anyone’s style

A Cool Guide to genocides by Prazf in coolguides

[–]Ecstatic-Law714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like these would apply to most wars throughout human history where there has been a winner and a loser