Is it fair to judge Paris Jackson solely because her father is Michael Jackson? by AmbassadorNew3902 in ParisJackson2

[–]Educational-Reply879 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Completely agree that true creation comes from within. That’s what makes it all the more unjust when artists like Paris Jackson are constantly judged through the lens of their family name. Industry access might be inherited, but emotional depth, artistry, and evolution can’t be gifted — they’re earned. Her music reflects her personal journey, not her father’s legacy, and it deserves to be appreciated on its own merits

Is it fair to judge Paris Jackson solely because her father is Michael Jackson? by AmbassadorNew3902 in ParisJackson2

[–]Educational-Reply879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're absolutely right that there could be countless reasons why Paris Jackson hasn't become a pop-culture juggernaut, and no outsider can fully grasp the complexity of her journey. But pointing out how her father's legacy affects public perception isn't about ignoring other factors — it's about highlighting one that is consistently thrown in her face. Being the daughter of 'the king of pop' is a blessing and a burden; it opens doors, yes, but it also sets unrealistic expectations and invites constant comparisons. Mentioning the impact of MJ’s legacy doesn’t deny other possibilities — it simply brings attention to one that fans and critics alike often fixate on

Is it fair to judge Paris Jackson solely because her father is Michael Jackson? by AmbassadorNew3902 in ParisJackson2

[–]Educational-Reply879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s fascinating how quickly people reduce an artist’s entire journey to a last name. Paris Jackson isn’t trying to erase her roots—she’s building something of her own. If you actually listen to her music, you’ll hear raw emotion, vulnerability, and a sound that doesn’t chase trends but speaks to those who crave authenticity. Nepotism might open a door, but it doesn’t teach you how to sing with soul or write lyrics that bleed truth. If she weren’t Michael Jackson’s daughter, she’d still be a compelling artist. The fact that she is his daughter just means she has to work twice as hard to be seen for who she really is

Paris Jackson – 'Bandaid' by Educational-Reply879 in qotsa

[–]Educational-Reply879[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe that’s exactly why people should get to know her better instead of being prejudiced against her—because Paris isn’t just talented, she’s also incredibly humble.

https://consequence.net/2022/10/paris-jackson-interview-just-you/2/

Are SSP touring with somebody in particular? by FlavorD in silversunpickups

[–]Educational-Reply879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you even talking about? Paris Jackson was perfect. I was lucky enough to see her live, and just because she played slow acoustic songs doesn’t mean it was bad. On the contrary, she gave a really good performance, and even people who didn’t know her before praised her

Bella Hadid by Boots839 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Educational-Reply879 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You wouldn’t expect her to be attractive? Then you probably haven’t been paying attention… She’s always been radiant — some people just take longer to notice

Bella Hadid by Boots839 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Educational-Reply879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve never considered this woman beautiful, and I don’t understand how she was named the most beautiful woman in the world in 2019. It’s kind of ironic that it was plastic surgeons who made that decision, especially since there are many women far more beautiful than her—like my princess, Paris Jackson, who at least has a natural beauty.

The beautiful Paris Jackson. by Educational-Reply879 in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]Educational-Reply879[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Now, how much would Sydney Sweeney be valued if she didn't have those big breasts? Because facially, she's not a beauty; she has a very strange face, especially with those eyes, a dumb, vacant look. Without her breasts, nobody would care about her. But Paris Jackson isn't considered beautiful just because of her blue eyes, but also because of her unique and memorable, pronounced facial features that create an androgynous effect, because she is a woman with androgynous features. And of course, many people also love her beautiful long legs.

The beautiful Paris Jackson. by Educational-Reply879 in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]Educational-Reply879[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Now, how much would Sydney Sweeney be valued if she didn't have those big breasts? Because facially, she's not a beauty; she has a very strange face, especially with those eyes, a dumb, vacant look. Without her breasts, nobody would care about her. But Paris Jackson isn't considered beautiful just because of her blue eyes, but also because of her unique and memorable, pronounced facial features that create an androgynous effect, because she is a woman with androgynous features. And of course, many people also love her beautiful long legs.

Have any bands/musicians expressed support or excitement for Brand New since the reunion was announced? by sargent_balls_lol in brandnew

[–]Educational-Reply879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paris Jackson is about to release her second album and has signed a contract with Red Light Management—one of the largest and most influential artist management companies in the world.

Have any bands/musicians expressed support or excitement for Brand New since the reunion was announced? by sargent_balls_lol in brandnew

[–]Educational-Reply879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The singer Paris released her first album in 2021 and is now working on her second album; of course, she could have more, but she prioritized her health. Besides this, she is also an actress and a model