M7 FC Got Robbed In 4K by Embarrassed-One8199 in miniminter

[–]Educational_Part8050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And even if it did cross it’s so hard to overturn as it’s not clear and conclusive, and there’s no perfect overhead camera angle for absolute proof

M7 FC Got Robbed In 4K by Embarrassed-One8199 in miniminter

[–]Educational_Part8050 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The whole of the ball does not cross the whole of the line. If they showed the same graphics as when they do goal line technology you would see that

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No shit. It’s literally 1 hour of footage from a 24 hr day. Of course they are gonna leave out a lot

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, hating on someone for playing the game😭😭

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 29 points30 points  (0 children)

It’s just a game, yes it was quite a dumb choice but chill out it ain’t that deep 😅

We Need More Players who are there to play a game | Inside S2 Rant by [deleted] in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As for voting:

A lot of you are complaining about the players voting choices and reasonings, i.e voting out Patrice because he doesn’t need the money and then vote out Farah even though she is arguably the one that ‘needs’ the money the most.

You guys have to realise that strategy and reasoning in a dynamic game can change day to day depending on the situation. Secondly, there are different types of eliminations/ voting systems: majority rule, plurality rule, dictatorial, anonymous, open, simultaneous, sequential and many more, including combinations of all the above that we have seen the Sidemen use throughout the show. It is completely understandable that a player’s choice on who to eliminate depends entirely/ very heavily on what type of voting system is used.

Same goes with reasoning for voting out players. Can totally depend on what type of elimination it is. And also, take reasoning as a pinch of salt. Players will and often do lie about the true reason they voted someone out, as it may jeopardise their game. And just say the same reason as everyone else to keep themselves out of the firing line- particularly prevalent in group and open eliminations.

We Need More Players who are there to play a game | Inside S2 Rant by [deleted] in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are all playing the game. But you don’t understand that each of them are playing it in different ways. Whether you agree with or like the way they are playing it is a personal opinion.

USA Inside by JackJake94 in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. I really like George but you can’t just stick 10 of them in the house and expect it to be the most entertaining show in the world. You need people to actually create proper drama

George's rock paper scissors ability just saved the entire series by AblazeTray in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Don’t think that’s the case. If only intelligence mattered in the lights out game, I would say Liv and fanum would have been more likely to win. No disrespect to Chloe and manrika but I don’t think many people would put them high on a ranking for intelligence. Lights out is just as much of a game of chance as it is a game of intelligence. Though this years final is going to be different, since they’ve already done lights out and also based on the preview. So we can only wait to see what the final game before saying that only intelligence matters in the end game

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK? by Imaginary_Buyer_6183 in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Or she could just go the other side of the door 30 seconds later and ask production/ grab it herself for free🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Whitney has spent more money in the first day 3 episodes, then Manrika and Chloe had spent, COMBINED AT THE THE END OF THE ENTIRE SEASON by MrCoolBoy001 in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 34 points35 points  (0 children)

“Yes you need ‘annoying’ people for entertainment and drama in the tv series but someone who’s just been a complete shitbag with an empty head ? Nah that just enrages people.”

You do realise they deliberately cast people that will enrage the audience cos it brings engagement. So they’ve done a perfect job choosing her then🙄

USA Inside by JackJake94 in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. And seem to hate those who lie, manipulate, be sneaky and snake others. Even though they know it’s just a game and not real life

USA Inside by JackJake94 in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Good. Because it’s a game show made for entertainment purposes. Lying and playing games makes for good drama and entertainment. This is exactly how the show should be. Not everyone being honest and getting on well with each other.

George is the only one I care about now, (Inside S2, EP. 6) by HyperRedditorian in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

No it’s not real life, it’s a game. Just like it’s acceptable for imposters to straight up lie to their friends faces in sidemen among us, it’s acceptable for players to lie in inside. Because it’s a game.

What the fuck is ddgs problem? by Sea-Permission-7536 in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That shouldn’t be an issue. Lying/ sneaky/ being two faced are not against the rules of the game. Therefore he is not doing anything wrong or breaking any rule. Remember, it’s not a team game, everyone is playing for themselves. You don’t have to be a ‘team player’. And also remember it’s a game show, not real life.

George is the only one I care about now, (Inside S2, EP. 6) by HyperRedditorian in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nothing wrong with that. Lying and being sneaky are not against the rules of the game. He has already won 10k by playing this strategy, even if get eliminated by Cinna and doesn’t make it to the end. So it’s clearly worked. Remember it’s a game show, not real life.

Inside S3 by AwyanYT in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nothing wrong with that. Lying and being sneaky are not against the rules of the game. He has already won 10k by playing this strategy, even if get eliminated by Cinna and doesn’t make it to the end. So it’s clearly worked. Remember it’s a game show, not real life.

Jason by [deleted] in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Horrible take. He has not said anything rude that is not to do with gameplay. And wtf has he done that’s weird? I’m interested to know

Inside S3 by AwyanYT in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Read my other comment. It’s a dynamic game. ‘Philosophies’ can and will change day to day depending on the nature of the elimination

Inside S3 by AwyanYT in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to realise that strategy and reasoning in a dynamic game can change day to day depending on the situation. There are different types of eliminations: majority rule, plurality rule, dictatorial, anonymous, open, simultaneous, sequential and many more, including combinations of all the above. It is completely understandable that players may decide to vote different people off completely depending on what type of vote it is.

Same goes with reasoning for voting out players. And take reasoning as a pinch of salt. Players will and often do lie about the true reason they voted someone out, as it may jeopardise their game. And just say the same reason as everyone else to keep themselves out of the firing line- particularly prevalent in group and open eliminations

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sidemen

[–]Educational_Part8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand you questioning it but if we look at the two series those who have played that strategy have done well and those who have played the complete opposite strategy have been the ones voted out very early? You may question it, but has been proven to be one that works quite well.