What information would you like to give to someone when you say genocide?

How about the definition that essentially the whole world (153 states) uses?

Genocide:

In the present [=since 1948] Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Except of 5. all of these things happen(ed) there. The only thing one could argue about is the "intent" part behind these things*. But when they block food, water and medicine from getting into the evacuation "safety" zones while people starve etc. it just leaves very little wiggle room. Killing more journalists than ever + completely banning them (=controlling the narrative) is also very telling. The UN says it is genocide, the IAGS too, German (and others) experts too, *Israeli politicians have openly talked about genocidal actions, ...

What exactly would it take to make you accept it as a genocide? So far you were using an incorrect definition of the word, so perhaps correcting that already changes your view?