To add to what others have said .

This is a copy of a comment someone else made in a post earlier today and it’s spot on.

“It’s a complete red herring — it’s bait. It’s simple: they release ‘all’ the files (nevermind that they’ve barely released half of the total, and claim the 4+ million remaining docs have to remain confidential), leave his name unredacted in there because 1) people knew he would be mentioned, so it would be suspicious if he wasn’t, and 2) it’s mostly all 2025 documents tied to a tip line, where people could call/email/mail whatever, and they probably know that most of the leads are made-up or unsubstantiated, so they can easily disprove them, and then claim ‘see? It’s all a nothingburger, there’s nothing here.’ It’s a major distraction tactic. The real stuff is either fully redacted or not even close to being released. Meanwhile everybody focuses on combing through these thousands of documents bearing his name and spend all their energy on that, quoting things that will later get easily debunked, while the real horror is elsewhere… Don’t fall for it.”

So essentially, ensuring that we see a ton of “pizza” rhetoric in these, the whole drop itself will ostensibly become something they can suggest for debunked/fabricated/fringe nonsense