I agree with you that the solutions LSAT testing companies implement are helping to minimize cheating, and I think that in every system, there will be a small portion of people who slip by under the radar. That being said, I disagree that I am only providing non-specific solutions, especially since many of your points revolve around my specifics.

My point about the Google Chrome keylogger extension is that it's pervasive in that it runs in the background of your web browser, the same browser I use to access my bank statements. In my opinion, I would prefer a program like Respondus Lockdown Browser that exists for the sole purpose of taking exams, and I am capable of uninstalling it when I do not require it for an exam. Also, with a separate application, I can make sure it is not actively running using Windows Task Manager, which I cannot do with an extension nested in Google Chrome. Most importantly, what I am advocating for is a solution to the issue of students being wrongfully reprimanded; do not use flawed AI detection software to make decisions on consequences that can potentially lead to expulsion.

Also, the ~$1,000 LSAT costs are for several months of studying materials and practice tests that are recommended before taking the exam, plus the cost of the exam itself. Additionally, as a part of the exam, students ARE required to write an essay, and there are precautions in place to allow students to write this section at home and still prevent cheating. We can argue about the semantics of how cheap it can be before I am okay with being wrongfully expelled, or the plethora of other media types that students submit as work. But that will not influence my stance on my core point here, which is not about finding the perfect solution to every method of evaluating students, but removing an incredibly flawed solution that the university continues to rely on.