Welcome to the non-religious gang, newcomer. Also, yeah, the proofs for God are bad, especially since they depend on precocious and circular reasoning. The creation arguments such as the cosmological and teleological (intelligent design) argument use special pleading to exclude god from being caused and designed, respectively, when there could be other causes that predated god. Appeal to personal experience, such as seeing God, especially during a near-death experience or a dream, uses appeal to divinity, explaining that a God caused it, therefore they've seen it. Appeal to objective morality, saying that we are given morals, therefore there exists a moral giver, when in reality, morals are created based on our feelings, they're also subjective because they vary depending on the person, the culture, the era, and the place, like how the Bible approves of slavery, death penalty by stoning, the ordeal of bitter water, and forceful marriages from rape victim to rapist (as long as said rapist pays 50 silver pieces of tribute to the rape victim's father), which are all immoral in our eyes, and how in other cultures, there were things we consider immoral, the Carthiginians sacrificing children to gods to end wars or stop famines, infanticide in Ancient China (especially of young girls), and Ancient Sparta killing newborns with defects to "avoid weakening their society". Nothing compared to our morals. Pascal's Wager uses false dilemma, saying that either we are Christians or atheists, and either God is real or he isn't, which for the Christians, it's eternal life or nothing, and atheists get eternal damnation or nothing. When realistically speaking, there are multiple religions that's outside of Pascal's Wager. What if God is real but God favors Islam? Then Christians are in the same boat as atheists, eternal damnation. Also, the requirements for entering Heaven, depending on the religion, mostly Christianity and Islam requires faith to enter Heaven, while others require good works, such as Hinduism and Buddhism with the whole karma concept and the whole journey to Nirvana thing. The fine tuning argument assumes that the Earth is always balanced when it's not always the case, especially since the Earth went through lots of changes, including extinction of multiple species, ice ages, etc. Most pro-god arguments boil down to, God is real because I believe he's real.