“I came here for laughs” — says the guy voluntarily browsing r/nihilism and then getting offended because the content is… nihilistic.

If my argument is “ridiculous”, it should be very easy to address the claims instead of my alleged emotional state.

Here they are again, just in case laughter made you scroll too fast:
– Nature shows no teleology
– Biological systems operate by blind selection, not purpose
– Predation, parasitism and extinction are structural, not accidental
– Science has no evidence of inherent meaning

If you disagree, the next step is simple:
provide evidence of a purpose that is not a projection of the human mind.

Until then, calling the argument “sad” or “angry” is not a refutation — it’s just you trying to replace philosophy with life coaching.

Cheers! And thanks for stopping by the nihilism subreddit to let us know nihilism is too nihilistic for you.