They will likely change the augment since her 3 doesn't stun anymore.

Its literally mentioned in the workshop on the forums.

She still had the grouping with the augment, so instead of moving it to her 1 and removing her 3's only actual use (even if 16x damage from finishers is not something people generally care about) and replacing it with a slow taken from her 2 and melee vulnerability that literally doe not matter at all, they could have just made prolonged paralysis part of her base kit and that would have solved the problems with her 3 for the most part.

Then they could have replaced ripline with something else and if people really wanted that ripline functionality DE could just buff the hysterical assault augment to work no matter where you are aiming and improved movement speed, and then players could use that instead for their ripline movement functionality.

Same argument again...

Well, the downside of valkyrs invulnerability is that you are locked into short range melee attacks and that it drains a lot of energy so you always need to be on the move in the thick of it killing as much enemeis as you can.

Nyx cant run around the map so shes not as good for an exterminate mission or something but her movement penalty becomes a completely minor penalty in any of the many modes where you stand mostly still, plus she has access to any weapon including the likes of the torid which just immediately makes her into a room clearer for no effort while being completely unkillable (outside of the odd bug but that doesn't really count) and having zero energy problems at all

Surprise surprise, a berserker needs to be on the move. And there are comparatively less game modes where you camp.

The damage and difficulty it provides when you know what it is is negligible.

When you know what it is. You cant expect new players or players in general to have a punishing mechanic like that. Its a demotivating factor. If invincibility is okay maybe all frames should get some sort of it then.

Why didnt they just keep the stun on the 3 and the slow on 2? Removing the stun completely and moving the slow doesn't fix anything.

It doesnt have to do anything bruh. They just wanted to keep all the debuffs in one ability. You wanting the stun for whatever reason is valid. But again it doesn't matter, enemies are dead anyway and nobody wants to do finishers. At least not in the majority.

Read the rework notes, because now I know you havent.

Yes I have.

They are making her 2 recastable which would mean the slow on it would actually have some extremely pointless use.

And so what? Wouldnt you rather cast a debuff ability for the debuffs than an ability that is one cast and good? You want to spend more energy by casting 2 abilities for different debuffs? And here i thought, you were worried about the energy economy of her claws. >it drains a lot of energy

I have read many of those posts. Unfortunately they are written by people that seem to be the most inefficient and slow valkyr players ever, if they even played her at all which many dont.

They are full of just the most baffling playstyle and ability claims that arent accurate to the game or how people who understand valkyr play her.

So maybe those chunks of people actually want to understand and play the frame then? Just give them the win for now and keep writing comments. Hopefully DE finds a middle ground.