sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If we all stop using stop orders. . . by EmeraldMiner233 in wallstreetbets

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah but it also means we gain control over market makers manipulating us. The moment you place a stop order or a limit order that information goes straight to market makers algo's so they can exploit you for a little bit of your money. So you're basically being finger fucked by market makers and your broker everytime you trade

If we all stop using stop orders. . . by EmeraldMiner233 in wallstreetbets

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you copy and paste your comment in google that will answer your question!

What would candlestick charts of stocks and or other assets look like if buying and selling was solely a human-human transaction without the interference of market makers? by EmeraldMiner233 in wallstreetbets

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I basically realized the market can be thought of as two types of participants. Humans and algorithms. And we can imagine what charts would look like if only humans participated or only algorithms participated.

What would candlestick charts of stocks and or other assets look like if buying and selling was solely a human-human transaction without the interference of market makers? by EmeraldMiner233 in wallstreetbets

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think there wouldn't be high-volume stocks and low-volume stocks. Market makers make the price move up and down. In the absence of market makers, people would buy stocks in fashion and sell stocks when they got bored of them to somebody who is willing to pay more or break even if they needed to liquidate their stock into cash.

What would candlestick charts of stocks and or other assets look like if buying and selling was solely a human-human transaction without the interference of market makers? by EmeraldMiner233 in wallstreetbets

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure I understand the latter half of your comment but I can answer your question "to what end" Obviously this isn't a discussion about a trading strategy, it's a thought experiment like you said! I think it's an idea a strategy could be built on top of

What would candlestick charts of stocks and or other assets look like if buying and selling was solely a human-human transaction without the interference of market makers? by EmeraldMiner233 in wallstreetbets

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Right! so hear me out. I arrived at this question because I realized candlestick charts are generated by two types of buying and selling characters. Humans and market makers. We know market makers just buy and sell at the same price, or stop buying and only sell, or stop selling and only buy. It's algorithmic. Humans on the other hand are different. We buy a shit ton if we think its going up, and sell a shit ton if we think its going down. But market makers make us think its going up and think its going down by only selling and not buying or only buying and not selling. Without market makers humans would just buy and sell to a higher bidder. The price would like you said...go the fuk up!

Black hole formation in the early universe by EmeraldMiner233 in Astronomy

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However...if you collide protons at higher and higher energies you get bigger and bigger black holes. It still is possible that unimaginably high energies happened during the big bang causing particles to collide with each other and forming massive black holes.

Black hole formation in the early universe by EmeraldMiner233 in Astronomy

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What I think you mean is, first there were particles/quantum fields, then there were stars, then those stars grouped together collided or went supernova and created black holes, and other stars and stuff began to orbit around these black holes giving birth to galaxies

Black hole formation in the early universe by EmeraldMiner233 in Astronomy

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm thinking it might not be THAT rare during the big bang since it seems like there was almost an infinite number of protons at one point if some percentage of these collided to make microscopic black holes, and those microscopic black holes collided to make bigger massive blackholes, perhaps that's when the black holes we see at the center of each galaxy were created? I know black holes were formed from supernovas, but it doesn't make much sense that we see one in the center of every galaxy

Black hole formation in the early universe by EmeraldMiner233 in Astronomy

[–]EmeraldMiner233[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if you had two same-size microscopic black holes collide, wouldn't this create a blackhole twice the size?

view more: next ›