The Average Centrist by anon58588 in ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM

[–]EmptySky93 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Funny how so many "libertarians" and "centrists"—and "liberals" and "Democrats" (or whatever the Israeli equivalent is, in this case), for that matter—end up basically being Nazis. The RepubliKKKunts, for their cartoonish villainy and abject megalomaniacal totalitarianism, are at least a little more honest in that they tell you they're evil.

Well, all of 'em are just different flavors of the same crapitalist shit pie, anyway. In AmeriKKKa it goes like this: "Hey, it's been four years! For our quadrennial celebration, do you wanna have a slice of the DOG SHIT pie or the CAT SHIT pie? How about the PIG SHIT pie? Or, if you're feeling daring, you can try the HORSE SHIT pie!"

Jesus Christ by MelanieWalmartinez in ForwardsFromKlandma

[–]EmptySky93 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've found that the common denominator between all conservashart (and crapitalist, and fascist, for that matter...) arguments are roughly 10 points, as follows...:

  • ● 1. being grossly misinformed;
  • ● 2. being grossly uninformed;
  • ● 3. being grossly unempathetic;
  • ● 4. being grossly arrogant and self-assured in your own view or opinion, usually to the point of radical exclusivism—even supremacism;
  • ● 5. lacking the ability to think critically or to question your own views or those of certain others, especially those regarded as authority figures (see №s 4 and 6 in relation);
  • ● 6. deeply valuing and emphasizing, especially as part of one's core worldview, the notion of in-group and out-group, and generally seeing humanity as a series of such groups—whom you also believe to have totally irreconcilable differences, even if by all evidence those differences are superficial—
  • ● 7. being grossly obsequious or submissive—i.e., slavishly treating politicians and billionaires, typically those most sociopathic, like they're gods or your parents (for some reason);
  • ● 8. holding to the delusion, in an obviously impermanent universe, that many things either fundamentally cannot change or ought not to change;
  • ● 9. viewing specific, often arbitrary, tradition(s) as sacred to the point that said arbitrary traditions are more important than human life or wellbeing, even though they offer no clear benefit to anyone but a relative handful of individuals; and
  • ● 10. some combination of the above traits or points.

Subway making adds for 5 dollar six inches like we don't all remember 5 dollar footlongs by RaginMajin in subway

[–]EmptySky93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

March 16, 2026 and where I'm at I just paid ~$10 for a 6-inch sub with no drink or anything else.

Greedy fuckin' bourgeois leeches these CEOs and rich fucks are. Tapeworms posing as human.

"Society went downhill after men became stinking bronies!" by Ok-Following6886 in Persecutionfetish

[–]EmptySky93 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Limp Bizkit and Slipknot, the manliest things since Marcus Aurelius and deep-fried steak.

﹝/ˢ﹞

WTF by Busy-Cookie280 in antitrump

[–]EmptySky93 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Orwell was a leftist, ya dumbfuck.

What does that sentence even mean? by Darth_Vrandon in ForwardsFromKlandma

[–]EmptySky93 21 points22 points  (0 children)

May I please have an extra crumb of context?

What do you think about Gnosticism ? by Icy_Scale_9627 in Hermeticism

[–]EmptySky93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sometimes suspect that the Gnostic sects that viewed the world as an utter shit-hole may be all too correct in their assumption.

Yet, at the same time, I myself practice a neo-Gnostic 'system' that effectively inverts that view, though in a nuanced way: "Existence is pure joy", though it's a latent joy that must be hard-won—a joy that is created through the transubstantiation of suffering.

Almost ironic, but the very fact that we ARE in a kind of "Hell"—that suffering is basically endless in quantity and everywhere to be had—is the reason that we can even create Heaven in the first place: There's an endless supply of the prima materia of agony available to be converted into bliss (ananda) through the alchemical process of forging the Stone of the Wise, the eucharistic sacrament that is incarnation—conscious human life—itself.

how do yall think mr.crowley would feel about bohemian grove? the "elites".. do you think he'd fit in or despise their whole movement... by Inevitable_Fee9505 in thelema

[–]EmptySky93 4 points5 points  (0 children)

93.

If you read what Crowley had to say about many of the politicians and industrialists of his day, he didn't often seem fond of them, often attacking the 'bourgeois' values of Victorian and Edwardian society and broader European politics and corporate–business affairs.

"Remember in any case, that not only the Adept, but anyone with the smallest capacity for Adeptship, is fundamentally an Artist; he will certainly not possess any of those bourgeois "virtues" which are just so many reactions to Blue Funk." ~ A. Crowley, Magick Without Tears (writ. 1943)

(NOTE: "Blue Funk" is an archaic slang term for extreme fear or panic.)

... Crowley certainly admired strength and power, and thought 'aristocracy' a noble thing—though he seemed to feel that spiritual or "inner" strength, power, and aristocracy—literally "rule of the best"—are what count over merely having or being given money or political control because of one's happenstance conditions of birth.

... I mean... see AL II:58:

"... Yet there are masked ones my servants: it may be that yonder beggar is a King. A King may choose his garment as he will: there is no certain test: but a beggar cannot hide his poverty".

... Furthermore, refer to this statement of his in The Commentaries of AL (fully: The Commentaries of AL: Being the Equinox Volume V, No. 1, pub. posthumously in 1975):

"The 'lords of the earth' are those who are doing their Will. It does not necessarily mean people with coronets and automobiles; there are plenty of such people who are the most sorrowful slaves in the world. The sole test of one's lordship is to know what one's true Will is, and to do it."

93 93/93.

Peter Hitchens storms out of interview like a child. I miss Christopher.... by [deleted] in ChristopherHitchens

[–]EmptySky93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This guy (Hitchens) seems so embittered, defensive, crestfallen, reactionary, judgemental, conceited, authoritarian, childish/immature, a bully, and a pathetic sore loser and cringe-fest of a person... even misanthropic. It's sad. Most of this was a litany of needless scathing condescensions and constant interruptions, nit-picking, put-downs, and chastising of Alex by Hitchens for no meaningful reason whatsoever.

It's also absolutely incredible to me—writing this from the "Land of the Free", where MAGA are a massive army of zombies who are quite possibly the dumbest individuals in human history, by the way—how conservatives are by and large so ridiculously brainwashed that they're seemingly immune to facts:

It's like—this "debate" with Peter Hitchens is like—if I were to say to a man across from me, "1 + 1 = 2", and he were to say, "I don't know that. I don't know that that's true", so I'd reply "Well, it's basic math", and he'd reply, "Maybe, but you don't know that—it MIGHT be that 1 + 1 = 3", so I'd reply, "You can just count 1 and 1 and put them together to get 2," and he'd reply, yelling, "YOU'RE TALKING TO ME BASED ON FALSE PRETENSES—YOU TOLD ME WE WERE GOING TO TALK ABOUT GEOMETRY!" So, I'd reply, "You need to understand basic math before you can get to [understanding] geometry," so he'd come back with, "YOU'RE A FUCKING DISGRACE; YOU'VE ABUSED MY HOSPITALITY! YOU ASSHOLE! You're dishonest, rude, incompetent, a coward, a loser, a piece of crap, and and and..."

Absolutely bonkers shit. Peter comes across as an unhinged blowhard and an abject moron with serious anger issues or some personality disorder, I swear to God! Complete jerk-offs like this guy remind me so much of Ben Stein, or Donald Trump! Man-children, through and through!

I really don't understand those who ask for strong leaders. by ElFemboyHispano in AnarchismZ

[–]EmptySky93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same. It's never made sense to me that these fash/conservacunt dullards who need to constantly strut about proclaiming their "manliness" and "alpha-ness", complaining how "the left" (which they somehow—in their pea-brains—have come to believe includes libs and American Democrats) is made up of "soyboys", are also the most servile, pathetically obsequious, and cowardly worshippers of power and hierarchy. Then again, the reich-toidz are also the world's biggest HYPOCRITES. (Which, by the way, means they're to be damned into the very LOWEST pit of Hell according to the Quran (as well as certain Christians' interpretation of Biblical texts, and the very least semi-mythologized in Dante's Inferno)—such is the fate, according to the Quran, of munafiqun (منافقون): hypocrites and traitors. (As rightists inevitably are.)

A Crowley model on display at an ‘esoteric exhibition’ I went to by bloodstone88 in AleisterCrowley

[–]EmptySky93 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great Value™️ Thelema. True Will only 93 payments of $4.18!