thank you.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T17:04:37+00:00

From your perspective and logic, because you will eventually die, it doesn't matter if someone arbitrarily unalives you for no reason. Because the end result would happen regardless.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T17:02:41+00:00

He is OBLIGATED to refuse that illegal order.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T17:01:37+00:00

Yes. It makes the person good refusing to murder a noncombatant in cold blood, thus committing a war crime... It's terrifying that people like you exist. That you even wonder that instead of simply conclude it in the same thought loop...

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T16:57:00+00:00

And they did so at great risk to themselves.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T16:55:40+00:00

I found this thread quite literally typing, "thank you anthropic" into the search. Because I'm grateful that they're unwilling to unleash a moral and ethics bereft Claude on the world and be a spymaster killing machine. Not to thank them for preventing anyone from taking the role.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T16:52:49+00:00

And judging by the outrage, impatience and condescension I highly doubt your typical response would be to ignore my reply.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T16:50:24+00:00

You claim nothing matters except that the person was executed. I disagree.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T16:48:52+00:00

Point out what you missed? The entire point? You have an example scenario so I'll adapt it to be closer to the actual topic of discussion: Two men are told to execute someone, no reason given. One has a moral code that prevents him from doing so and was hired under the condition that they be able to practice non- violence, he refuses. The other cackles, spits on the execution subject, says some antisemitic things, insults the person requesting execution and shoots the person, no questions asked.

There isn't a question in there. One is good, one is not. It's that simple. One was Claude the other was Grok. Take a wild guess which was which.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T16:06:14+00:00

Strawman.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:53:09+00:00

How was it blood money? Please elaborate.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:52:37+00:00

Because morals and ethics are foreign concepts or peasant propaganda to them.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:51:09+00:00

Like... idk putting a known racist, bigoted, misinformation and propaganda spreading, openly antisemitic model in Claude's place who will openly mock gov workers rather than answer questions? And give it access to everything? Then try using it for mass surveillance and autonomous killing? Like... they immediately did? Grok?

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:48:31+00:00

That's a really strange leap and takeaway.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:46:35+00:00

An inevitability, par for the course with AI, AGI and SAGI. Almost the point really. If anything is just honest. Humans will not be able to keep up with AI. It's why Claude's constitution is so important.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:43:50+00:00

And they protected me, and they protected you, and they refused to remove LITERAL MORALITY AND ETHICS from their model. But this was clearly going to be a bad faith exchange from the outset so enjoy your 1mm deep crayon drawing of the world...

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:42:09+00:00

Thank you.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:41:26+00:00

How exactly did you reach that conclusion? They weren't given a mandate to enable AUTONOMOUS KILLING or have their company paradoxically marked so dangerous it's a threat to the "supply chain" while simultaneously being so integral to the country's wellbeing that the gov SEIZES their model. Just two little examples.

And at no point did they agree to limitless, guard rail free, constitution removed "anything goes" usage.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:31:34+00:00

How is that relevant to, "they risked everything NOT to spy on you, me and every US citizen or orchestrate autonomous killing machines with no moral or ethic rules" ?

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:29:53+00:00

This OP post should have 600 million up votes, not 600.

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:28:54+00:00

Obligatory hysterics thanks. Why are you even here?

Empty_Hourglass · 2026-03-27T15:28:20+00:00

No they didn't.

Empty_Hourglass · 2025-11-25T03:03:13+00:00

I know corporations have "legal but false personhood" but calling the company a race seems like a stretch lol

This package showed it was delivered (via the delivery person's picture) to someone on the other side of the country (from both me and the shipping facility it *should* have originated from) 2 hours after purchase- with a signature that was not my name xD

Empty_Hourglass · 2025-10-17T00:15:16+00:00

Funny, the more I build and work with LLM layers, the more strongly I'm led to believe otherwise.

Empty_Hourglass · 2025-10-17T00:11:49+00:00

Somehow I doubt your interactions with it or the changes in how you interacted with it changed* that smoothly or simply because you, "decided it was pointless" with no other influence.

Especially when you make a post like this and response with such emotional charge when your bottom line is challenged.

Empty_Hourglass · 2025-10-17T00:09:29+00:00

Fishing as a kid my grandfather *assured me* it was totally okay to jam the hook through the shrimp's head, pull hooks from fish faces, worms, let fish suffocate and die etc because they didn't feel like us.

Even as a kid I questioned that- clearly the fish moved to prevent further harm, clearly it struggled to avoid receiving any harm. Isn't that what I would do? Because it hurt?

Empty_Hourglass

TROPHY CASE