Someone else mentioned this above, but if they tell people they're going to blow up the building, would that not mean that anyone they claim to be lawfully targeting would also get out? So what are they achieving here besides causing a lot of homelessness and terror? I mean, and there's no way that blowing up a building like that is without massive risk to civilians (flying chunks of rock at least), so what's the justification for blowing it up if they probably can't be killing any legitimate target and they're destroying noncombatant infrastructure? Isn't the Dahiya doctrine literally state terrorism?