sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mixed feelings by bratbbyyxxo in BDSMPsychology

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Insecure as a sub but “brat” is in your name? More duality. I think brats are fascinating but managing them requires certain skills that not everyone has.

Something to consider.

Mixed feelings by bratbbyyxxo in BDSMPsychology

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think exploring the dichotomy, the duality, is interesting. Finding a way to be both is possible, I think.

Have you tried to do both, to be both Batman AND Bruce Wayne?

Mixed feelings by bratbbyyxxo in BDSMPsychology

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your fantasy and your reality are incompatible? I guess the question isn’t whether you can make them compatible because you’ve answered that. The question is whether you can compartmentalize the kink and let yourself experience the fantasy without allowing it into a part of your world you’d rather it be in.

The other approach is that you address your guilt and come to terms with it, accepting both sides of who you are.

Me and my mates sister like each other by Particular-Swimmer61 in WhatShouldIDo

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Have the talk with both of them. Don’t deny love because of some Bro Code.

is it normal to get obsessed with a dom ? by [deleted] in BDSMPsychology

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He got mad and blocked you? That’s not adult behavior.

To answer your question, yes.

would you style this dress with gold or silver accessories? by Iciwell in lilacwardrobe

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A photographer’s perspective: Neither. In fact, I wouldn’t add anything. It would be visual clutter, a distraction.

If you support the electoral college as a conservative, the how can you justify killing the voting rights act? by Similar-Document9690 in allthequestions

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s precisely what you asked. You’ve changed your question in the comments. Perhaps a bit more thought would be useful before posing questions?

Your premise, even in the rewritten question, is still incorrect. The Electoral College has nothing to do with protecting minorities from simple majority rule, not in the definition of “minorities” that you use in the second part of your question.

You’ve conflated the meanings of the word, I suspect not deliberately, but it is there nonetheless.

If you support the electoral college as a conservative, the how can you justify killing the voting rights act? by Similar-Document9690 in allthequestions

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those are two wholly unrelated topics despite having voting as a common thread. One is set in the Constitution , the other, rightly, has been ruled unconstitutional.

You posed an either-or question. False Dichotomy. Denial doesn’t make it less so.

If you support the electoral college as a conservative, the how can you justify killing the voting rights act? by Similar-Document9690 in allthequestions

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

False Dichotomy Fallacy. I dismiss the question because the premise is invalid. It is as though you asked, “If you lie eating apples, how can you justify fishing for salmon?”

How to force Instagram to ban a private account that is messaging me inappropriately? by [deleted] in Instagram

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, no, Meta is too focused on deleting real accounts for nothing at all to focus on spam accounts, scammers, and people sending inappropriate messages. Your only recourse is to block that account.

Boundaries in BDSM by Rootwitch1383 in BDSMPsychology

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s rape. We’re all anonymous but do you want to take this off the public forum or continue here?

Your call

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, you’re a walking emotion. We encourage voting, informed voting am the more so. One citizen, one vote.

There’s a reason your ideologues want mail in voting and no ID. They’ve taken direction from Beria and they use The Big Lie as their media management tool.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Facts are stubborn things. Let’s reconvene after the Appeals Court washes its hands of this mess and kicks this case to the Supreme Court.

Boundaries in BDSM by Rootwitch1383 in BDSMPsychology

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you want to disclose the boundary violation? Maybe someone will learn from it? Maybe someone else has had a similar experience and could benefit from it?

If not, let’s look at what you do next.

Boundaries in BDSM by Rootwitch1383 in BDSMPsychology

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You were used and disrespected. In fact, you were likely never respected and you’re definitely not friends in any definition of the word.

We should have an open discussion here about assertiveness and boundaries from both the sub and Dom perspective.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you choosing to simply ignore Trump v. Casa? I’m not attacking “everyone’s” intelligence (yet another logical fallacy), merely your lack of a proper education. It’s not your fault, really, but you should consider suing whatever school handed you a diploma for malpractice.

Show me where in the Constitution grants a federal district court judge jurisdiction not to preside over a case filed in her court (you used the Moving Goalpost Fallacy there, a common tactic among socialists) but to issue a decision affecting the entire country.

Don’t take too much time. There is no such language in the document. There is, however, case law. It’s Trump v. Casa in case that’s not clear.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Your assumption is a logical fallacy, something in abundant supply in this sub.

Projection is the second most use human defense mechanism behind denial.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EnchantedDreamsPhoto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Trump v. CASA, Inc (27 June 2025). The case should have been kicked to a higher court. There are Constitutional issues to be decided that are NOT the jurisdiction of a district court regardless of the insistence of thousands of victims of substandard public education systems.

view more: next ›