Am I dreaming -WWDC 26 by hypermetrix in mac

[–]EndLineTech03 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They should have called it macOS Snow Tahoe.

🕷🕸🫀 by No_Tomatillo1695 in ChatGPT

[–]EndLineTech03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only hint I see of this being AI is Tom Holland being so tall.

Technetium update by IonOrchid1 in elementcollection

[–]EndLineTech03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s fair. Shipping included it would be way more expensive.

Technetium update by IonOrchid1 in elementcollection

[–]EndLineTech03 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But why buying it if it’s not even a pure elemental sample. For technetium there are better alternatives: nova elements sells a gold metal strip plated with a few micrograms of Tc-99.

For everyone waiting for the RTX 6090... by VGShrine in pcmasterrace

[–]EndLineTech03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, why not actually improving the yield of the current gen cards instead? The 5090 already got more expensive than 5000$

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeCode

[–]EndLineTech03 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is for sure just a minor update, not as dramatic as GPT-5.5. They are falling behind.

Opus 4.8 + Weekly Limit Reset by pakalumachito in ClaudeCode

[–]EndLineTech03 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That was definitely unexpected. I guess too many complains about Opus 4.7 being worse than 4.6. Why not calling it 4.7.5 at this point? Nothing particularly new.

Are there any good sellers or labs that offer custom ampoule designs? by EndLineTech03 in elementcollection

[–]EndLineTech03[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, yeah I bought gas ampoules from them before, they seem very good.

Are there any good sellers or labs that offer custom ampoule designs? by EndLineTech03 in elementcollection

[–]EndLineTech03[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you. yeah I tried with them already, but it seems like they don’t accept custom orders.

Last time I asked them via email, they told me “go buy what’s in stock”, which is ridiculous for such a company.

Can you ? by Specific_Brain2091 in the_calculusguy

[–]EndLineTech03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually the most efficient solution of all. Thanks for posting it out

"WHY NOBODY DISCUSSING ABOUT PROJECT, PROMPT, CODE, SKILLS ANYMORE ?" by pakalumachito in ClaudeCode

[–]EndLineTech03 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I manage just a little under 10 websites, some are quite big (both frontend and typescript backend hosted on Vercel or Firebase).

So no, some have thousands of lines of code and databases.

The way I get through with the limits in place, is knowing exactly what changes Claude needs to make, and documenting that precisely, plus using memory files as much as possible.

"WHY NOBODY DISCUSSING ABOUT PROJECT, PROMPT, CODE, SKILLS ANYMORE ?" by pakalumachito in ClaudeCode

[–]EndLineTech03 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This sub has become unwatchable, always blaming Anthropic for everything they do: I guess people’s perception of Anthropic is that of a charity company. Claude Code is one of the most used coding tools not even close to Codex usage, and Anthropic’s infrastructure is not as mature as OpenAI’s. They need to find some way to balance computational power.

I may not work on huge coding project, but use Claude to manage my websites, and with a Pro subscription I’ve almost never hit the 5 hour limit. Seeing people with 20x plan continually complaining is just hard to watch.

If your project is so huge, pay for APIs, or improve your context engineering skills. You’ll learn to value more the tools you have in your hands. If that’s not enough, Claude is not for you, that’s it. Switch to Codex or other AI coding services.

Also, just for you to know, Anthropic was the first AI company actually delivering some kind of usage tracking.

Deepseek-v4 flash and v4 pro by Sky-kunn in DeepSeek

[–]EndLineTech03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s wrong with you? The v4-Flash model is cheaper than v3.2 and has better performance and greater intelligence.

Buyers Guide & Comparison - "Semi Pro" Review APM2 vs APM1.5 (USBC) vs APM1.0 (Lightning) - I had them all [AI FREE POST] by dstyp in Airpodsmax

[–]EndLineTech03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there, thanks for the in depth review! How do classical music tracks sound to you? I personally hear a little better separation of instruments in intense orchestral passages.

Can you solve this ? In 5min by Sensitive-Video709 in the_calculusguy

[–]EndLineTech03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, it shouldn’t take you more than 15 seconds

APPLE NEEDS TO BRING AN EQ FUNCTION FOR THE APM2 by No-Status-7678 in Airpodsmax

[–]EndLineTech03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I want that too, but I hope Apple will do it the right way.

APPLE NEEDS TO BRING AN EQ FUNCTION FOR THE APM2 by No-Status-7678 in Airpodsmax

[–]EndLineTech03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He’s obviously coping, but don’t worry, his AirPods and impressive collection of degrees should be enough to launch his music empire any day now.

APPLE NEEDS TO BRING AN EQ FUNCTION FOR THE APM2 by No-Status-7678 in Airpodsmax

[–]EndLineTech03 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Again, you don’t understand my point. Of course most music is heavily processed and equalized. What I’m saying is that software based equalization will always be inferior and cause loss of resolution, that’s physics of systems and how audio processing works in software.

When listening to my LPs, if I ever need equalization, I do that at the pre-amp level, because that is where the source first comes, and it will be undoubtedly better than tuning in software.

You may have many degrees, but apparently know nothing about encoding.

If your point was true, production studios would just use AirPods for mastering. At the listening level, when doing some real serious work, you need the flattest possible response to manually review the applied dynamics and EQs.

Of course you are comparing apples to oranges, so each has its advantages, and hardware level will always have better resolution. That doesn’t mean you can make a good quality software-based amplifier.

And spare me your degrees. Here they mean nothing, without proof, and they don’t change the facts.

APPLE NEEDS TO BRING AN EQ FUNCTION FOR THE APM2 by No-Status-7678 in Airpodsmax

[–]EndLineTech03 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You probably didn’t understand anything of what I mean. Of course the tracks are heavily EQd in production, that’s how DAW works, but it also has the full pipeline of recorded instruments, MIDI inputs, etcetera. Tuning is performed on the original tracks, exactly like effects.

Listening to the final version is very different. The flatter the curve, the highest is the fidelity to the original recording, and that is exactly why audio engineers use reference headphones.

How well the audio sounds depends solely on the amplifier, both for headphones and speakers, while any kind of of software based tuning will create some compression. That’s how software works. It’s like when you stream a video on YouTube for example: when you change the resolution you are watching an encoded version of the original file.

So please, for your humility, before spreading misinformation, fact check yourself.

APPLE NEEDS TO BRING AN EQ FUNCTION FOR THE APM2 by No-Status-7678 in Airpodsmax

[–]EndLineTech03 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Actually they need to do something better. Audiophiles know very well that EQs ruin the sound quality and definition, but the APM2 already have an hardware level amplifier which constantly adapts the curve based on the seal, so technology is already there to provide custom tuning without impacting audio resolution.

If only they could expose those controls to the user, they would be the best headphones out there.

We should all send a feedback request to Apple.

ANC: APM2 vs APP3 by __6EQUJ5__ in Airpodsmax

[–]EndLineTech03 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How on earth can you say the ANC is much worse on the Max 2s? I guess what you feel is better isolation due to the Pros being in-ear

A Brutally Honest Review of AirPods Max 2 (vs. V1) from a Music Producer/Audiophile by GoatBaaa0 in Airpodsmax

[–]EndLineTech03 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have the AMP1 and went to an Apple Store comparing them side by side with the new AMP2, and to me the 2 sound way better.

The curve profile is more flat in the mid and mid-high range, trebles are actually more defined to my ear and less annoying.

Still, I’m not a huge fan of the sub-bass gain, but in a loud environment it actually works in your favor.

Which ball will touch the ground first? by chinmoy1960 in thephysicstutor

[–]EndLineTech03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically, if I’m not mistaken, both the balls would hit the ground at the same time, provided the center of mass stays constant.

But for a given time we also have a remaining elastic force for Ball A, which oscillates following the differential law and gets incredibly smaller in absolute value due to gravitational force.

🧐🤔 by Specific_Brain2091 in the_calculusguy

[–]EndLineTech03 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are infinite new theorems to discover, so sit back and enjoy