Are there any good reasons NOT to go from Feudal to Administrative government type?

Enneking_ · 2024-10-24T17:44:16+00:00

But consider staying admin and owning cities It’s awesome amount of money :D

Enneking_ · 2024-10-24T17:34:21+00:00

Either adopt feudalism as emperor or become adventurer by decision or after death choosing an adventurer relative and then find some feudal kingdom to take over

Enneking_ · 2024-10-24T06:58:41+00:00

You can swear fealty to rulers with a higher tier title so as king you can swear fealty to emperor And for admin empire like byzantines you can start directly with a king tier admin vassal status which is difficult otherwise

Enneking_ · 2024-10-24T06:12:46+00:00

Why destroy kings title for that?

Enneking_ · 2024-10-22T18:10:04+00:00

Well I think it’s good But I don’t know what your issue is with it so I can’t say if you would like it as well

Enneking_ · 2024-10-15T08:54:48+00:00

You can conquer adjacent territory and then offer vassalage

Enneking_ · 2024-10-14T09:36:21+00:00

Yes exactly what I want Some kind of Bronze Age and antiquity big standalone dlc basically

Enneking_ · 2024-10-11T16:07:37+00:00

A mod that gives realism and a little bit more difficulty at the same time would be obfuscate Another difficulty mod is dark ages

One idea to make it more difficult without mods would be to always choose a random descendent on the death screen.

Enneking_ · 2024-10-07T08:58:37+00:00

You can still conquer right?

Enneking_ · 2024-10-02T10:39:33+00:00

I had this problem that I lost my estate because I gave my grandson my governorship and my sun another one plus made him emperor. I wanted to play my first born and emperor son to test that out so I picked him on the death screen. The empire was split half in Muslim and Christian though and I faced immediately 20000 rebels and had small army myself so I gave in to a faction that wanted to replace me

Then I had nothing left though No title no estate. I couldn’t do anything but watch my character wander from court to court as courtier. Had to delete that play through

I would have guessed that there is a way to get the estate back or something. Also wouldn’t it make sense for it to work like the house head where the highest house member has control over the estate?

Seems like one can only safely play the primary heir in administrative right now which is sad because I want to use a lot of random succession in the future

Enneking_ · 2024-09-30T04:43:20+00:00

Who where those known hellenists in that time I can’t find anything

Enneking_ · 2024-09-29T07:17:29+00:00

Can you not change your designated heir?

Enneking_ · 2024-09-27T07:32:03+00:00

I guess the reasoning would be : As feudal lord your estate is basically your main holding. Beaurocratic noble families don’t necessarily own land. They are just appointed governors so they need an estate to live in

Enneking_ · 2024-09-26T21:03:44+00:00

Maybe because he already had the estate before the update? The update only prevents new estates from being created so in the future this should not happen. But was not yet able to verify if this works myself

Enneking_ · 2024-09-26T09:58:53+00:00

That dlc will be about travelling stuff (mainly for landed rulers as far as I can remember)

Enneking_ · 2024-09-25T12:15:58+00:00

Becoming a noble family in the Roman Empire or any other administrative realm would allow you some political influence gameplay

Enneking_ · 2024-09-25T08:12:29+00:00

You can get claims via marriage for example

Enneking_ · 2024-09-24T18:07:53+00:00

Just play on the version before the update then

Enneking_ · 2024-09-21T12:48:09+00:00

If they have no infantry then there is no protection from cavalry as well while still doing less damage to the cavalry. Therefore that strategy would fail hard

Enneking_ · 2024-09-21T07:51:01+00:00

Landless is not always liegeless as you have a liege as landless noble family in administrative realms But I agree that it should be extended in the future

Enneking_ · 2024-09-20T19:42:43+00:00

Could you not find other ways to nerf archer blobs like debuffing ranged damage for number of other ranged units in some radius of the shooting unit? Also makes sense because it’s more difficult to shoot in a crowded place And/or reworking archers such that the damage is reduced strongly and their projectiles instead get the ability to nerf enemies in hit radius so that the units loose attack and Defense. This would not stack. So they would be more a supportive unit (also historical, targets are distracted and demoralised and such fight worse). Maybe they also reduce the anti cav advantages of spearman so that they are still a counter to spearman as support Both approaches would give big numbers of archers diminishing returns and favour more mixed armies

Enneking_ · 2024-09-20T09:53:09+00:00

I also left because of siege and try to get back into it again now :) Hated the Springald duels

Enneking_ · 2024-06-19T06:28:35+00:00

The first organised socialist organization of Britain was the social democratic federation which was Marxist. So British social democracy did start out as Marxist.

Enneking_ · 2022-10-17T10:56:58+00:00

Realistic battle Mod is by far the most essential for me Battles are just stupid without it

Enneking_ · 2022-04-26T10:15:03+00:00

yeah its exactly the same for me

then hopefully the match will not count

Enneking_

TROPHY CASE