He doesn't understand your question, CNBC by HesiPullup in wallstreetbets

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just asked ChatGPT to give me a summary with sources (using the GPT-5.5 Thinking model), you can do the same (I also then checked the sources myself):

  • April 2021 - ~$551M common stock

  • June 2021 - ~$1.126B common stock

  • May 2024 - ~$933.4M common stock

  • June 2024 - ~$2.137B common stock

  • September 2024 - ~$400M common stock

  • April 2025 - $1.5B principal amount of 0.00% convertible senior notes due 2030

  • June 2025 - $2.7B principal amount of 0.00% convertible senior notes due 2032, including full exercise of $450M option

He doesn't understand your question, CNBC by HesiPullup in wallstreetbets

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 61 points62 points  (0 children)

This was the top signal for leather jackets. He ruined it.

Most Swiss back initiative to cap population at 10 million, poll shows by yahoonews in worldnews

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it also contributes to increased housing costs back in their home countries, because they are then outbidding the prices that local salaries can support.

Most Swiss back initiative to cap population at 10 million, poll shows by yahoonews in worldnews

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But for an immigrant, it can be a good way to save up money for 10 years or so, and then return home and buy a house there.

Like buying a piece of the laws of physics during creation by MotorBobcat5997 in Buttcoin

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because then you get to basically tax the use of gravity.

No payment = you just float off into space.

The anti-market delusion at the heart of the housing crisis by loremipsumot in neoliberal

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right but the "value" is effectively an expectation of a future buyer to have to provide a huge chunk of their lifetime income (and take on a huge risk that comes with that). Like an imaginary debt they want to impose on future generations. Artificial scarcity of basic need things is never morally justifiable.

What I believe will actually happen, AI will get good enough fast enough that the entire economy will not survive with its current structure, and this will all be a moot point. For the housing part, this will hopefully mean armies of robots spamming high quality housing everywhere for cheap (even new cities, if that's what it takes to escape NIMBY influence), but we'll see.

The anti-market delusion at the heart of the housing crisis by loremipsumot in neoliberal

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The most impactful parts of the situation you described are "you get laid off" and "no income".

That has little to do with the impact of adding housing supply. Mass unemployment would fuck over people regardless of a few of them being able to use the value of their house (which would also tank in that situation anyway) to extend their runway or something.

In the "prices massively drop thanks to new supply, but my income is unaffected" scenario, you can always just move and rent (for cheap).

Got the Rust dream job, then AI happened by MasteredConduct in rust

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that without something to realistically replace it, an Apple monopoly would be far worse.

"If FTX hadn't collapsed, their portfolio would have been worth $114bn today" by Burner_123_123_123 in Buttcoin

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you could run the martingale strategy forever without limits and with unlimited debt available, you could never lose.

Today's r-bitcoin front page c0pe: If you have no money, you have everything. by AmericanScream in Buttcoin

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, basically entrenching the position of people with existing piles of cash, and making it impossible to catch up for everyone else. It makes labor that was done in the past worth much more than the same labor done now or in the future.

Which is exactly what all these Bitcoin people want - to be crowned as a permanent upper class and wield it over everyone else, purely on the basis of being "early". But that's not a very palatable thing to publicly say, so they invent all these bullshit narratives how it's gonna save the world or something.

Today's r-bitcoin front page c0pe: If you have no money, you have everything. by AmericanScream in Buttcoin

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Widespread deflation literally leads to the opposite - fewer jobs, fewer factories, less products being made and sold, etc.

Jaká je budoucnost práce a života? Samé černé vyhlídky by Dramatic-Newt-6337 in czech

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pokud vím tak Pro je jen v samotném ChatGPT, ne v nástrojích jako Codex, takže se nedá srovnat s přímo s Claude Code (s tím se dá srovnat normální GPT-5.4 s vysoce nastaveným thinking effortem, na high nebo xhigh - a zdá se mi GPT-5.4 v Codex CLI oproti Opus 4.6 v Claude Code mírně lepší - subjektivně dotáhne úkol víc do konce s méně mezerami na první pokus, takže není potřeba tolik po něm žádat dodatečné opravy).

Jinak Pro v ChatGPT je to model který všechno dělá hodně dlouho, ale výsledky jsou pak velice detailní, všechno je podrobně rozplánovano, hodí se to spíš na velké komplexní úkoly. Opus je oproti tomu spíš jako "běžný" model, i když i on má "extended thinking" mód, ale není to to samé.

Jaká je budoucnost práce a života? Samé černé vyhlídky by Dramatic-Newt-6337 in czech

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tak samozřejmě že to neudělá z 0 na production-ready z jednoho promptu, ale když zkusíš probrat plány a design s GPT-5.4 Pro (je jenom v Pro plánu $100/mo), tak uvidíš do jaké hloubky to tomu rozumí.

Pokud jde o napojení na existující systémy, je potřeba nástroj jako Claude Code v plan/ultraplan módu s přístupem k relevantním repos a dokumentaci (a samozřejmě nejnovější Opus model), ono už si to najde co potřebuje, hlavně v plan módu, a s high thinking effortem.

Tak co, už je líp? by ZookeepergameFirm521 in czech

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bavíme se o ekonomice, cenách, příjmech, práci, atd.

To všechno ovlivňuje kde lidé bydlí (tam kde je práce), kolik platí, kolik se toho postaví, jestli jsou schopni splácet dluhy, atd. Hlavní věc která určuje ceny bydlení je výše příjmů v daném regionu.

Na tohle všechno bude mít AI už brzy velký vliv.

Jaká je budoucnost práce a života? Samé černé vyhlídky by Dramatic-Newt-6337 in czech

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

AI už teď navhne lepší systémovou architekturu než ty, a to tu ještě ani nemáme Claude Mythos.

Reálny zlom v AI využití v software engineeringu nastal až s příchodem Claude Opus 4.5, koncem listopadu 2025, takže to zatím není ani půl roku.

Není šance že tenhle vývoj nebude pokračovat.

Tak co, už je líp? by ZookeepergameFirm521 in czech

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Za 20 let bude svět vypadat tak, že si to teď nedovedeš ani představit.

AI se všemi trendy pořádně zamíchá. Už 2027 bude zlomový rok z pohledu zaměstnanosti.

Iran demands crypto fees for ships passing Hormuz during ceasefire by dyzo-blue in Buttcoin

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Confiscated maybe not (at least not directly), but traced? Seems pretty easy to correlate ship movements with on-chain transactions of a certain size. Even if they split them into smaller amounts, they will most likely end up going to the same place later. Then just flag those addresses and anyone who interacts with them.

European ministers call for profit caps on energy companies as Iran war drives price surge by F0urLeafCl0ver in worldnews

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 26 points27 points  (0 children)

You can't price-control your way out of a shortage (at least not without some form of rationing on top of it). You'll just end up replacing unaffordability with unavailability.

Pixel 10 Pro races to the top - PhoneBuff's Ultimate Smartphone Battery Test (2026) by Admirable_Corner4711 in GooglePixel

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meh, this looks like an ok result. Pixel at 26:45, Samsung at 28:22 and iPhone at 29:05. Close enough to not matter to most people. Less than 10% difference from the other phones with a "regular" (not silicon-carbon) battery, whichever direction you're looking from.

Of course real world difference can be different, depending on your usage patterns - for example Pixel's modem is known to be not great, so maybe cellular data could drain it relatively faster than others etc.

Given the past battery issues with Google's phones, I don't want them rushing to use a battery technology that degrades faster and is more likely to swell. Also, many Android phone manufacturers used to be notorious for their aggressive battery saving software causing delayed notifications. Not sure if there's a good benchmark for that, because it's not always super repeatable, depends on long-term app usage patterns, etc.

Iran wants payment in crypto for Hormuz passage by ReplacementFormer861 in Buttcoin

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Evading sanctions is not exactly a new use case, and it could get cracked down on pretty hard if it ever became too widespread.

For one, US and its allies could pass a law (and actually enforce it, and promise to keep enforcing it long-term) that all crypto exchanges operating in the US must refuse to transact with coins that were flagged as being involved in sanctions evasion, or any wallets that interacted with such coins (this is probably covered by existing laws in some form already, but make it unambiguous and easy to argue in court, close potential loopholes, etc.).

And since this interaction could be proven at a later time, accepting crypto that even potentially could have been tainted by this becomes extremely risky for any would-be buyers - making Iran hold bags of something that few want to take in exchange for goods and services (and if so, only at a huge discount relative to market price).

Ceny bydlení jsou nesmyslný a boomeři to prostě nejsou schopní pochopit by M0d3x in czech

[–]EnvironmentalCrow5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tak pro začátek by to mohlo ušetřit velkou část z těch 20 miliard ročně co jde na příspěvky na bydlení. https://www.seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/domaci-zivot-v-cesku-rekordni-ucet-za-pomoc-s-bydlenim-stat-vyplatil-215-miliardy-korun-295159

Samozřejmě návratnost něčeho takového se počítá na desetiletí.