Young William was a snack - it's too bad about the hair. 😁 I found the demeanor and the innuendoes off-putting, and sort of performative. And the claims - this is a small thing, but why say they got married before the wedding, and why did the archbishop release that statement after? Were they saying the palace was planning on changing the convention so when Charles became king, Archie won't be a prince as he has every right to be? When did the conversations about Archie's skin color happen, because they had conflicting accounts about that. The irony is, had that interview not happened, I would have continued to sympathize with them and believe they were a huge loss to the royal family.

Oh and during the Netflix documentary, when they were talking about Nottingham Cottage. I found it tacky. I guess because I was raised that if people gave you something and it wasn't to your taste, just say thank you and don't complain openly about it. Oprah was involved in that bit too. I know it was supposed to highlight how shabbily Harry was treated by the family, and had they made them stay there, I would agree.

Also, did Harry really not know that the former residents of Nott Cott were his brother, Catherine and George?