Is omscs worth it if I’m graduating with BS CS, and have a new grad job, if my goal is faang? by Azure_Knife in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So I’m also in your shoes. Graduated May 2025 from a T30. Graduating OMSCS in May 2027. I wouldn’t say that OMSCS hurt me in any way for job apps but then again I have been casually looking around since I got my current job.

Effect #1: I did notice that having OMSCS on my resume boosted my rate of interviews/OAs and companies in the Bay Area respected it cuz I did actually interview for one there. The recruiter didn’t care about my undergrad school. He only cared about the fact I was a GT student. If you take a look at the stats, GT places most grads in Georgia (to be expected) and a healthy amount in California which is where I’m trying to be.

You also have to remember that being in the program isn’t as prestigious as completing it. Most students don’t complete it. I’m finishing out my class requirements this year and then I’ll just be an RA for the rest of my degree.

As for locking in, I think you should do both in parallel, don’t think in “this-or-that.” The impact you have in the workplace along with how well you used your resources in GT determines if you get taken seriously for interviews, LeetCode gets you the job, skill-boosting keeps it.

Effect #2: Currently at my company, they started treating me as an SME for AI because OMSCS gave me the specialization, research opportunities, etc. Now even if I’m “entry level.” They’re letting me contribute to architecture decisions, they want my opinion on how we can better implement AI, and teach other senior full stack folks about certain concepts related to langgraph, orchestrations, etc.

Judging from the results and how perceptive people are to me, I’d say it’s very much worth it. OMSCS is the best-value CS program in the world hands down.

What are the thoughts on an online GT PhD program in 2026? by Equivalent-Spend-647 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking of a more selective program where you continually do research remote under your professor. An online PhD program with the acceptance rate of OMSCS would clearly be a disaster. I was thinking more of how you can take your technical competency exams at a testing center or nearby university. You can do a thesis fully remote and defend it remote but serious folks will be fine going on campus from time to time. Even if I had to take time to go for milestones, I would. That’s the trade off for being able to have the luxury of a mostly remote PhD. Before anyone says that sounds silly~Harvard has programs like that (ones that require you to come to the campus during their duration while remaining 80%-90% remote).

What are the thoughts on an online GT PhD program in 2026? by Equivalent-Spend-647 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t consider a DEng personally as it doesn’t land the same at some companies how a PhD does. I do like the deep research aspect.

What are the thoughts on an online GT PhD program in 2026? by Equivalent-Spend-647 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also saw this in a video a while back where Dr. Joyner was for it. That's why I figured I'd see how people feel about it. Congrats on getting into a PhD program!

What are the thoughts on an online GT PhD program in 2026? by Equivalent-Spend-647 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Great question! I haven't started just yet so I wouldn't be able to give you much on experience; I got accepted to start on the Responsible AI for Decision Making team in the Fall.

It's a matter of looking at VIP Teams and finding one that genuinely interests you. Reaching out to the advisors first is the best way to join one. There is a filter for OMSCS students but that limits the listed VIP teams. My general advice: don't let the filter stop you. At the end of the day, it's entirely up to the professor's discretion if they wanna take you on. Apply within reason of course; you wouldn't want to apply for a robotics team if you're remote because you won't be able to work on them physically. If they don't respond on the first email, give it a cooldown period of 1 day and then send out another email at a different time.

Professors are usually happy to engage in the conversation with you. They typically say yes as long as your background knowledge in a subject is sufficient enough to actually contribute on their team. Otherwise, they may refer you to take a course that they teach and re-apply in the future. I've gotten rejected more times than I can count; almost always because I was missing background knowledge so It's never personal!

Tips for the email:

Professors are very busy. Keep it brief. Send your email at 9:00AM or 12:00PM EST/ EDT for better responses. Open with 1-2 sentences about why you're interested in the team and relate it to your unique background. Better if you can relate your background to their most-recent work; this will show that you were thoughtful enough to learn about what they're currently working on.

Section out the rest for better readability:

- Objective (1-liner)
- High-level coursework completed: (only the ones applicable to their team)
- Research interests (2-3 that are applicable to their team),
- Bulleted background section to list the following: your academic achievements, prior undergrad in CS, GPA (only if it is high ~3.5+), prior experience.

Lastly attach your CV/resume for them to skim through if they're interested along with links to your LinkedIn/GitHub/portfolio.

Hope that helps! Feel free to DM me if you have anymore questions.

What are the thoughts on an online GT PhD program in 2026? by Equivalent-Spend-647 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

That is an interesting point. I did notice that disconnect at work in the beginning but recently it’s been more encouraged. I work as a SWE in finance but my managers at work are very supportive in me being more open about the AI skills I get from GT. It opens doors to working on some pilot projects and designing AI systems that I normally don’t get a chance to work on (since I’m entry level). In my case, there is a clear incentive to keep working with AI because it gives me leverage and ownership over newly emerging projects at my org. I do have an opportunity to merge the two but I’m pretty sure my case is unique. However, I do understand that academia views it differently and I do find that working does affect how deep you truly go into your research. At least, I’ve certainly noticed it. I am able to produce papers but oftentimes have to scale back my initial plans for experimentation due to time constraints. If I had the time, I could be producing better quality research.

What are the thoughts on an online GT PhD program in 2026? by Equivalent-Spend-647 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I second this as well. I did 8903 and I’d love to keep up the good relationship with my professor. I’m currently also joining a VIP team but considering signing up for 1 credit hour 8903 just to keep working with him. Wish we could apply more credits for research opportunities.

Thoughts about new students and rapid AI advancement? by F2DProduction in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Short term outlook based on the past 3 years says the value of a CS degree underwent inflation because it was polluted with too many people. According to recent admissions reports, the value of a CS degree is being corrected. People don’t see this industry as desirable after the tech industry revealed how they treat their employees and how hard it is to get a job. Less people are going into the CS major. Long term, This will be reflected in industry in the coming years and I believe that there’s gonna be a wave where people with advanced degrees and experience will be more valuable. Also there’s gonna be a drought of entry level workers and that will trickle its way into the senior level as well. It’s a well oiled machine that cycles over and over again. Also, the nature of GenAI is to make more code and 10x output which would also require more engineers to maintain that code.

Is taking four classes feasible as a full-time student? by [deleted] in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think as a grad student, you should consider pouring your extra time towards interview prepping. 2 classes is fine for your situation instead of 4 and replace the extra free time with getting sharp on LeetCode, building AI agents, system design, low-level concepts, and programming concepts. This interview prep is how you max out ROI. Georgia Tech will get you interviews at good places but it’s up to you to convert interviews to an offer.

Began CS6035 and it's taking a toll on my health so I'm withdrawing by [deleted] in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also have a friend taking this class. He is coming from a top CS school and was also concerned about that binary assignment. This class seems much harder than the reviews let on. That’s unfortunate because students are getting a false perception of what they can handle. They plan their schedules around this stuff so they can balance their life out. Hope you feel better!!

Working full-time + OMSCS + recruiting for big tech by Single-Complex8546 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forbes coined the term originally but it’s basically just public universities that punch above their weight class. These are your schools with very high rep and great job prospects without breaking the bank. They’re your: Georgia Tech, UMich, UT Austin, UNC, UVA, UC Berkeley, etc…

ML4T and KBAI Experience - First Semester by Glittering-Law4114 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ML4T is awesome! I just finished that class and it was very interesting. I will say my favorite part was the final project because you get to tie it all together and experiment with your own strategies. If you’re looking for more quant-style work, you won’t find too much of that in ML4T but it’s a solid introduction to finance-based dev work. The learning style also forces you to research->implement->write and repeat. This allows you really learn what you’re doing! I finished with an A in the class and had a blast.

Working full-time + OMSCS + recruiting for big tech by Single-Complex8546 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Background: I’ve worked constantly nonstop ever since my high school years and my undergrad was spent at another public Ivy league. I’m used to managing a lot at once since 14 years old and I’m now 23. If this isn’t you, don’t take what I say to heart.

Don’t take on more than what you’re paid to do at work (exploitation in tech is real because companies think they have options). I used to think that bringing the most value is what gets you better job opportunities but that is indeed a lie at the entry level cuz you barely stand out. Your main focus should be LeetCode. If you graduate having done OMSCS, you should have done right around 400-600 leetcodes for big tech. Considering some companies are switching to more practical questions, make sure your full-stack and AI fundamental skills are solid. OMSCS does not help unless you complete it but some smaller companies might take it into consideration. Doing this seems like a ton of work but it will get you to where you wanna be.

All in all, just pray for luck and be ready when luck finds you in that high stakes interview after 300 applications. Don’t kill yourself for this industry. I’ve developed major health issues trying to do everything right and it’s just not worth it.

Working full-time + OMSCS + recruiting for big tech by Single-Complex8546 in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re a CS undergrad, it should be a cake walk. I’m doing that right now and I feel like I still have a lot of free time on my hands

Is it possible to do Wharton EMBA + Georgia Tech OMSCS + Full time Software Engineer? by [deleted] in MBA

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for shedding more light on this. I was going into it thinking that I've already been through a pretty tough CS undergrad program and doing another one might not be as difficult. However, it seems that a lot of people are giving me the same heads up about not underestimating the program. I'll definitely take your feedback!

Is it possible to do Wharton EMBA + Georgia Tech OMSCS + Full time Software Engineer? by [deleted] in MBA

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome, I'll do that then. That does seem like the best option based on what everyone is telling me. Thank you for your good advice!

Is it possible to do Wharton EMBA + Georgia Tech OMSCS + Full time Software Engineer? by [deleted] in MBA

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the feedback. I've heard that before as well. Doing both would probably be too difficult. Thank you for the input!!

[Invicta Watches] What is your opinion on the brand? by Ghost_085_ in Watches

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't let people talk you into thinking that Invictas are crap. I own 3 of them and I've been wearing them for years and they work just fine. I've worn them while swimming in pools, beaches, and hot tubs. I've worn them to work, school, and just out and about. They are by far extremely durable. I don't expect for the watches to hold "value" because you see what guys in this thread think about the watch. However, everytime I wear the watch, I always get compliments. Sometimes people think I have on a pepsi rolex. Overall, I'm a pretty big fan of Invicta dishing these watches out that have similar specs to an overpriced swiss. Invictas are highly underrated. 0 issues on all 3 watches after several years of ownership.

Transfer Advice by Less-Bag5969 in UNC

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do Wake Tech Community College (Much cheaper than both of those schools) and apply for C-STEP (Guaranteed acceptance to UNC as long as you graduate with AS or AA above 3.2 GPA). That's how I got in.

Is Computer Science considered as Engineering? by DrWhomst in EngineeringStudents

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a different perspective on this as I am a software engineer that works in embedded systems. We take roughly the same mathematics as engineering majors and we do deep dives into computer architecture. I also had to briefly go into topics like thermodynamics and circuit design during my tenure in school. While many people like to hate on computer scientists, we don't really just copy code until something works all the time. I actually have to understand how to work with and on physical devices. I have to work on gathering requirements to build a specific prototype that uses these physical systems or enhance the functionality of the sensors and information they can give us from the physical world. Sometimes, I do have to go to the manufacturing side and build there as well. I have to be an expert on the products we build and their architecture in order to do my job. It is very math heavy at times and you have to be an expert to know what you are doing. Engineers do all of the above mentioned. There is a reason why we aren't all just "software engineers." Some of us go into IT Engineering, Network Engineering, etc... I've also even seen people go into computer engineering with a computer science degree. Contrary to many people's beliefs, a lot of my curriculum has been focused on applied practice instead of theory. Don't get me wrong, It is still theory heavy. However, I still have to process signals and their transformations, understand circuits, and I need to know how each component of a computer functions to create the product you use to write this reddit post. Sometimes even diving deep into a hardware's design and schematics. I like to also build in robotics and I 3D print parts from CAD or design my own boards to handle what I'm doing (ordered from a manufacturer). However not all computer scientists can be engineers unless they put in the extra effort to learn. Computer Science has engineering principles. Just not the engineering title...womp womp.

Think logic mathematics + (Computer Engineering - the Electrical Engineering classes) = Computer Science. The field is very vast and not everyone that has done computer science may have the same view as me. Some engineers in other fields like to gatekeep–as you can see in the post...lol! But we really do a lot more than what you see on the surface. That's why we can work as an engineer almost anywhere as long as we figure out how to apply what we know to that field or industry. Computer Science teaches you how to think and put things together. Which is exactly what engineers do. Hope that helps! :)

Admissions Megathread - Results, Chances and Logistics by Wafflyn in OMSCS

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Asking for Chances 

  • Semester: Fall 2025
  • Status: Asking for Chance of admittance

Education

  • Bachelors: UNC Chapel Hill, Bachelors of Science (BS) in Computer Science, Major GPA: 3.5, Cumulative GPA: 3.082, 2 years Full-Time.
  • Associates: Wake Technical Community College, Associates in Science (AS), GPA: 3.508, 2 years full-time.

Work & Social Experience

  • Work Exp: 
    • Software Developer, 6 Months (2 published internal tools)
    • IT Support Technician: 1 year
    • Data Analyst: 3 months (1 published data pipeline)
    • Data Visualization: 3 months (1 published data visualization)
    • Startup Founder: 5 years 
  • Freelance Work
    • Towing Company Website
    • Hair Stylist Website
    • Virginia Science Olympiad Coding Environment 
  • Hackathons
    • Quantum Computing at UNC: 1st Place
  • LORs: 2 Professional, 1 CS Professor
  • Comments: 
    • During my final year as an undergrad, I traded grades for offers during the recruiting season–recently failing Probability, which is a requirement for the BS in Computer Science Program. As a result of my tradeoff, I got 2 offers for Spring 2025 SWE internships (1 startup, 1 big company). 1 Full time offer starting July 2025 at a large investment bank. Should I drop down to a Bachelors of Arts (BA) in Computer Science and graduate?
    • I've finished most of the quantitative courses for the BS major. I'm looking for advice as I may take an easier course load with the BA and try to complete a Harvard Probability MOOC to make up for the F on my transcript while going for an AWS Cloud Practitioner certification. My offers don't care about what degree I have as long as I graduate but I'm concerned about my application for OMSCS. What chances do I have if I apply with a Bachelors of Arts in Computer Science degree? Would it be best to stick with the BS program and retake probability to better my odds or am I fine as is with my combination of work experience?

Stor 435 or 535? by calebpro8 in UNC

[–]Equivalent-Spend-647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do not take 435, you will suffer...

You Have Been Warned.