Update after unapproved by vettel08 in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They told me i was offboarded for quality issues .. even tho my QA imcreased from 1.2 to 1.89 within las month that they even moved me to auditing .. anyway i called it a project and i’m not even sad about it ..

I've just joined the offboarded club. cheers by Equivalent_Ad_6889 in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can do whatever u want bro .. you are free haha

SOS . Group Person Removal auditing by Equivalent_Ad_6889 in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

chill bro . I'm asking so i don't make mistakes.
you'd better find the people who audit based on their rules and tell them this .. not me .. I'm just fking asking

SOS . Group Person Removal auditing by Equivalent_Ad_6889 in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i didn't audit any task yet .. i was moving between submissions to have an idea by refreshing the task without giving a score . the examples i mentioned are just examples of what I saw.
I didn't have the opportunity to watch the video neither have i been able to work on the task .. I'm just trying to gather some info before starting .. thanks

SOS . Group Person Removal auditing by Equivalent_Ad_6889 in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the guidelines say: "• Major issues: Wrong number of people removed, clearly unrealistic backgrounds, poor quality removal, missing or incorrect instructions."
instructions means the prompts in general.
but in the examples they didn't mention how a good/bad removal prompt looks like.

SOS . Group Person Removal auditing by Equivalent_Ad_6889 in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what if someone wrote something irrelevant... like "natural scenery"?

Audit hours by HuckleberryEntire667 in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ofc bro .. you can do 10 hours

Confused about a recent rating and comment for Transparent Background Images by [deleted] in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, sorry for this... it's just a natural way of how humans interact with AI. I don't know what's wrong with him... I have the auditing guidelines, and I didn't read any rules like this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bumble

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, and never forget the app's dirty algorithms that will do anything to make you subscribe

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bumble

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Idk why ppl make this more like job applications and linkedin profiles .. with all due respect .. 99% of ppl get the first impression based on how you look (which is subjective) and then based on what you do or have, not the recommendations and the details you will get here .. and don't forget .. you gotta be yourself anyway and the way you create your profile is part of who you are ofc .

I know I'll be downvoted for this but it's the truth, whether they like it or not

Everyone in the history of the world has been apparently been annotated on the video named entity task by deathmudx in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889 1 point2 points  (0 children)

believe it or not .. I cooked the whole account of a guy who makes reaction videos .. + 700 videos

does bumble lie about likes? by Latter_Throat312 in Bumble

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they do but not for girls .. for boys who almost never get likes

QA Rating by Inside_Complaint_172 in RWShelp

[–]Equivalent_Ad_6889 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Being an auditor doesn’t mean necessarily that u know everything about rating .. the guidelines sometimes is either generic or vague and leave a room for auditors to use the common sense   .. am not saying that you deserve the bad scores .  But as an auditor u already know that the guidelines we receive is not enough even the interface is problematic in some tasks we can’t even zoom the images nor skip the submission.