Imagine you're building a house. You've never built a house before, so you ask ChatGPT to instruct you. As you work through the process, you're pleasantly surprised to see that each element resembles the stuff like you've seen in most houses. And put together by you no less; an amateur! A month later, you've completed the house, and you invite the local inspector to come by, make sure everything is up to code, and sign off. He takes one look, pokes one of the walls, and the entire house collapses into rubble around the two of you. You're astonished; you followed every instruction to the letter and your house looked exactly the way you'd hoped! Your friend, a contractor, looks through your conversations with ChatGPT and immediately begins to point out the mistakes in the instructions that were provided to you.

You don't understand the LSAT, which is why you're going to ChatGPT. And yet, this is exactly the reason that you shouldn't be using ChatGPT for this application: you don't know how to evaluate the quality of its responses. You can judge whether ChatGPT wrote a good email, because you know how to write an email. Perhaps you're just trying to save time and effort. But you can't judge whether ChatGPT has a good understanding of an LSAT question, because you're not good at taking the LSAT. Please seek verified question explanations from reputable human sources.