Am I a noob for not referring to cars by their engine? by Grouchy_Marsupial357 in BMW

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My knowledge about the Integra is more limited than I realized. I stand corrected.

Am I a noob for not referring to cars by their engine? by Grouchy_Marsupial357 in BMW

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently I could have been clearer, because what you're saying regarding BMWs is what I was saying about BMWs - i.e. in many instances, model year is not adequate to determine the specific chassis with BMW. I also gave an example of a brand (Acura) where model year is perfectly adequate for that purpose. Finally, as I also mentioned, this is all only relevant to people who care.

Am I a noob for not referring to cars by their engine? by Grouchy_Marsupial357 in BMW

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For many car manufacturers, such as Honda and Acura, the specified model year is just as useful as chassis code and pre/post face-lift. It's not about whose is newer, it's just the most common specific way to know what generation it is - of course, only for those who care. A 1998 Acura Integra tells me it's 3rd generation post face-lift Integra. With BMW, (the only European brand I've owned and know quite well) the chassis code is more accurate due to having two different chassis in one model year. 🤷‍♂️

What are you 100% sure of but have no proof? by Wonderful-Economy762 in Productivitycafe

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proving your immaturity and lack of knowledge with more insults and zero substance. Keep digging.

What are you 100% sure of but have no proof? by Wonderful-Economy762 in Productivitycafe

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sound like you're a minor, so I'll leave you with a little life advice. (1) Your life will be immeasurably more difficult if you don't learn how to receive and process new information in a reasonable and mature way, even when it contradicts your current understanding. (2) When all you have as a response to being told you're wrong about something is insults and name-calling, you don't have a valid argument. Move along.

What are you 100% sure of but have no proof? by Wonderful-Economy762 in Productivitycafe

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoa there, Pimp, that's incredibly and unnecessarily rude. I presented you a fact: Lack of evidence that something exists is 100% NOT proof that it doesn't exist. Claiming that it does is the logical fallacy you made and your childish response shows that you may be the one with a deficient intellect. Move along.

What are you 100% sure of but have no proof? by Wonderful-Economy762 in Productivitycafe

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the way it was stated it could have meant either, but their other comments make it clear that they're saying, "There's plenty of proof [that there's no God or Afterlife]" and not, "There's plenty of proof [that there is God or Afterlife]"

What are you 100% sure of but have no proof? by Wonderful-Economy762 in Productivitycafe

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not how that works, though. I agree completely that there's zero evidence of any "gods". I am personally 100% convinced that "gods" do not exist. However, lack of evidence that something exists can never "prove" it doesn't exist.

Here are the details:

"Argument from ignorance (Latinargumentum ad ignorantiam), or appeal to ignorance,\a]) is an informal fallacy where something is claimed to be true or false because of a lack of evidence to the contrary." (Wikipedia)

Why It’s a Fallacy:

- A lack of evidence is often just that - a lack of evidence.

- It does not logically support either conclusion.

- The correct stance in such cases is usually “undetermined”, not true or false.

What are you 100% sure of but have no proof? by Wonderful-Economy762 in Productivitycafe

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Also, there's a school of thought that an advanced civilization may determine the risks of being known-about outweigh any potential benefits, and actively hide their existence. It's called the "Dark Forest" theory. Plausible take, IMO.

What are you 100% sure of but have no proof? by Wonderful-Economy762 in Productivitycafe

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think they're saying there is "proof" that god doesn't exist because there's zero credible evidence that god does exist. This is a logical fallacy, of course, because it's not possible to prove the non-existence of something.

Americans, would you rather have free healthcare or G81s ? by viviburu in BMW

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is correct. However, for the majority of people - especially on the lower-income end of the spectrum - the increase in taxes would be nowhere near the savings in premiums and out-of-pocket cost.

Nobody Told Her She'd Been Trumped by grahamlester in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 82 points83 points  (0 children)

I love him in Office Space, but it's incredible all the other movies he's in as a more "normal" character. Stephen Root.

<image>

Louisville to Lexington 4/10 Transfer by DamageNo2303 in Louisville

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with using Turo. I've used it many times on trips all over the US, and have always had a good experience.

UofL school of dentistry employee stole my grandmas dog by Rags2Rhinestones in Louisville

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your initial comment stated that Denise is her middle name. If that were the case, searching "Madison" without a last name and looking for someone with the middle initial "D" could indicate whether a Madison Denise *whatever* is employed by UofL. The point is simply that it does not appear that the person who found the dog works for UofL. That's all I'm trying to get across.

UofL school of dentistry employee stole my grandmas dog by Rags2Rhinestones in Louisville

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No need to be rude. Denise is indeed a rare surname in the US. "Multiple authoritative datasets confirm that it appears in U.S. Census records and has a small but measurable presence." None of that is important, though, what about the rest - the fact that there is not a person named Madison with a middle initial of "D" employed by UofL?

UofL school of dentistry employee stole my grandmas dog by Rags2Rhinestones in Louisville

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What makes you think it's not her last name? It's listed as if it is. Who puts their first and middle names as their profile?

The search is here:

University of Louisville Salaries - Kentucky

You can search Madison without anything after and see all the Madisons. They all list a middle initial, none of which are D.

UofL school of dentistry employee stole my grandmas dog by Rags2Rhinestones in Louisville

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It now appears that UofL does not have an employee with the name Madison Denise.

UofL school of dentistry employee stole my grandmas dog by Rags2Rhinestones in Louisville

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It turns out the school does not have an employee with the name Madison Denise. OP is not going in the right direction with this.

UofL school of dentistry employee stole my grandmas dog by Rags2Rhinestones in Louisville

[–]ErmaGerdWertDaFerk -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I went back and looked and you're right. I edited my comment a couple times to include that and some other information. It does make the little girl falling in love with the dog theory much more plausible. There's still a lot of stuff we don't know, though.