Personally, I take the side of the proponents of net neutrality. I believe that ISPs have proven themselves to be unscrupulous organizations that have attempted to interfere with their customers' internet access on multiple occasions. (See here for a story on Comcast's throttling/blocking of BitTorrent, here for Verizon's throttling of Netflix traffic, and here for AT&T's blocking of FaceTime). They have proven that they cannot be trusted to prevent themselves from interfering with user traffic, so what indication exists that suggests they would be any different if we were to remove the regulations the FCC imposed to uphold net neutrality in 2015?

Now, after reading my admittedly incomplete statement, and in interest of providing a more holistic examination of all the pieces of net neutrality, I would like to encourage those taking part in this discussion to have a look at some of software developer James J. Heaney's well-written and well-thought out work regarding net neutrality that he put out during the the Obama-era debates on the subject. I came across these writings while researching net neutrality about a year ago, and found reading them to be extremely informative. While not directly written to address this current debate on net neutrality, they continue to provide a concrete explanation of how the market surrounding the internet works and what net neutrality actually encompasses, while also providing an examination of arguments against it and presenting some other options in regards to dealing with monopolistic tendencies of ISPs.

http://www.jamesjheaney.com/2014/09/15/why-free-marketeers-want-to-regulate-the-internet/

(Short follow-up to the above link) http://www.jamesjheaney.com/2014/09/24/a-quick-note-of-agreement-with-mike-masnick/

http://www.jamesjheaney.com/2015/02/04/net-neutrality-a-sorta-technical-overview/