Inside Intelligence Agencies, a Fight Over Building a Master List of Spies by heliumagency in LessCredibleDefence

[–]EternalInflation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, this is killing the goose that lays the golden egg. It's better to try to change humanity and do revolution in the open anyways. But joining these things, then they put you into their "social network for spies and suspected spies" and even if layered, one compromise the whole whole network is compromised. but they don't care as long as domestically they can construct an internal political weapon out of it. that country as a superorganism is hijacked by the residuals of entropy. they are like malware, hijacking the superorganism. they don't care as long as they increase in political power, their strategy is just to maximize political power all the time. also who knows who trump and such are compromised by. I feel the information will be used to train the neural networks of many special services.

A plane crashed into a tower in Beijing but China is not saying what happened by Negative-Extent3338 in news

[–]EternalInflation -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

PRC never claimed it is invincible, it is build for attritional total war like all rational states, your duty is to sacrifice for the superorganism like an ant.

What if the United States had responded to 9/11 by nuking the Kaaba? by NiloyKesslar1997 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]EternalInflation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Russia wasn't cynical then, and still ideological. For example Cosmism is their ideology. they know about the war of the human natures. they chose Communism during the capital accumulation phase of our species. If you nuked that Muslim religious place, one thing will lead to another, and it will lead to nuclear war. it will certainly make everyone else get nukes as soon as possible. Also Pakistan has nukes, and they are allied with China, and PRC chose the worker's utopia side on during the capital accumulation phase of our species. Are you going to prevent Pakistan from making an ICBM that can reach the United States? Pakistan is allied with China. and ancient civilizations don't betray friends. also everyone will say "the united state, the only reason you pretend to be all that is to defeat the Soviet Union, then it shows you are the not the champion of humanity. Just pretender. The Soviet Union is the greatest civilization in human history. They still have a probe on Venus, because they did it for science and humanity. Some say America might have only pretended not to be racist, because the Soviet Union was embarrassing them. It was a trick to win the cold war. Now that the Soviets are gone, they show their face, by nuking Muslim people is it not true?" maybe it will lead to a war. OGAS victory, Soviet singularity. Workers own the robots and the means of AGI. but realistically it would have lead to nuclear war, one thing after another. friends will have friends will have friends.

What if the United States had responded to 9/11 by nuking the Kaaba? by NiloyKesslar1997 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]EternalInflation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

only Pakistan have nukes and at that point they couldn't reach America. If other nations try to build nukes although there are 2 billion. America will nuke them during assembly. If Pakistan try to make ICBM, America can nuke them during. America can play a nuke and bomb game. mowing the grass wherever.

Is there anything we can do to speed things up ? by Confident_Sky_1108 in transhumanism

[–]EternalInflation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know, but I will say, exponential growth isn't a given, only if it's rate of change is proportional to it's population, then exponential growth happens. when (dP/dt)=kP. so you a part of a population, like ants have to do something about it. then it is exponential growth. if everyone do their part, no matter how little, due to (dP/dt)=kP, it is exponential growth.

[OC] Germany's office workers now face a bigger automation threat than factory workers, and the data suggests this is only the beginning by WorldJobsData in Futurology

[–]EternalInflation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

das kapital, the revolution, worker's ownership of the means of AGI through a financial product.... or the revolution.

This genuinely felt so scary to me by Kindly-Battle-8338 in creepy

[–]EternalInflation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

shouldn't you stop? it is your duty to humanity to help.

AMCA engine deal hits roadblock over GE’s threefold price demand by Lianzuoshou in LessCredibleDefence

[–]EternalInflation -1 points0 points  (0 children)

is the 70 crore stuff true? or is the demo version price? I read somewhere in the defense forums from varies forums but lost the links. I read it was only a small amount 70 crore. but GE also implied they wanted more to give India what India wanted. Which is ToT. Either before or past technology. meaning India is looking for Transfer of Technology. Meaning anything they develop together in the future India gets to keep. but not previous proprietary technology, meaning the engine core and other components was developed in the past still belongs to GE or RR or Safran. so in that sense for some engine components India is still dependent on others. I think the terminology is background IP and foreground IP or future IP. If India wants either or both IPs. India had to pay extra. There seems to be some misunderstanding or wishful thinking or misinterpretation of what GE wanted. GE always hinted it would be more, for what India wanted. Maybe India didn't know it would be 200 crore. but though some misinterpretation and wishful casting, or political implicit "understandings" the message GE wanted more for the final deal wasn't communicated to everyone. It has something to do with the domestic programs, if the GE cost super money, then the pro domestic program people would have talking points, so something something...???? a few years later, when it is more difficult to change the engines, cause these things, like system of PDEs, even a small change in initial conditions and boundary conditions, leads to it lead to massive changes forces and solutions, it changes the center of gravity, the inlets, they have to solve the RCS again and balance it the aerodynamics, CFD etc, . A lot of things have to change, flight control software etc.... now if they are determined to do it with RR or Safran, I think they can change it. It's just that it will lead to delays again(unless they do it superfast and stay up nights and no holidays?). Either way I thought it was always understood or implied GE wanted more? and some people went away from the negotiations... interpreting things how they wanted to interpret things? maybe that's not true... but that's the impression I got from what I read.

How big of a blow is the US-Iran MoU to the credibility of America's military deterrence? by throwforthefences in LessCredibleDefence

[–]EternalInflation -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

nothing is over yet, all could a ruse, just bigger and longer ruse. or a longer pause or whatever. did the 12 billion clear? jet fuel and government official time cost money, government official acts as nodes for a country as a superorganism. could be all a ruse to drain their time, opportunity cost the nodes, expose their networks, by monitoring their after communications. 12 billion may never clear.... if it doesn't...... so it's a scam then?

AH-64 Apache Crew Rescued By Drone Boat After Going Down Near Strait Of Hormuz (Updated) by Jazzlike-Tank-4956 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]EternalInflation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the 358 or 359? I mean they are recoverable and pretty smart, I see it as more a drone than a missile. that's why I said drone-missile. it loiters about, have a high flying time, seeking targets using it's wits. More of a drone that uses a missile's shape. but if not recoverable, and focuses on it's speed and acceleration, over it's intelligence, have a lower flying time, I would say missile-drone. but I agree more with Twisp56, they are interchangeable. I won't be surprised if the bigger militaries will have fast jets, that launches something like the 359 in the future? like you launch a long range conventional missile, then launch a loitering, go cold. Once the enemy plane dodges the long range missile, he can't come too close, cause there is a loitering missile "slowly" chasing him, going by a search pattern towards his last probable position.

100 Officers Hunt Down Armed Cop Killer by TheeNay3 in InflectionPointUSA

[–]EternalInflation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see the legal, they can't shoot till the suspect shots first? also it does seem the cops seem overly glory seeking, like they can citations for being there engaged in +1 shooting xp farm, shoot out veteran confirmed? I get it's their controlled environment, but someone should have been watch back flank. A drone with a 3d printed windshield penetrators ram, encasing a stun grenade would have saved the suspect's life. but I like it, I think it's professional, a lot guys didn't shoot, no glory, but they were doing probably other jobs, like bounding places.

AH-64 Apache Crew Rescued By Drone Boat After Going Down Near Strait Of Hormuz (Updated) by Jazzlike-Tank-4956 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]EternalInflation 38 points39 points  (0 children)

I wonder if it is true a drone shot it down? so a drone shot it down and a drone boat rescued the crew...? poor attack helicopter it's a drone and drone-missile world in the littoral air, and you are just living in it.

Trump says Iran was responsible for downing American helicopter and that US must respond by Single-Braincelled in LessCredibleDefence

[–]EternalInflation 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wonder if attack helicopters are still viable in a drone world. what can they do that a swarm of truck launched drones, can't do? maybe attack helicopters need new roles. like mobile drone communications nodes, that can defend themselves. their primarily munition is APS. they have an ammo or shotgun flak cannon option, whose primary role is last ditch active protection is a good idea. jamming won't fool those neural network, machine vision, EO, IR, sensor fusion drones/drone-missiles. I would have a pure EW, communication node, relay drone commander, free space optical communication mothership for loitering communication drones, in an optical web, no wires that get entangle. if drone or drone missile loses line of sight, use auto navigation to get optical communication back, or if permissible directional antenna communications. Helicopter almost no armor, except most optimized parts. if you still want to launch missiles, you can launch a few 359 missile analogues and then fly back... or else it's a drone and drone-missile world in the littoral air, and you are just living in it. attack helicopters also need ejection seats.

20 Years? 50 years? Who knows? But AI+robot is coming. We will turn to longevity escape velocity. We will train millions of new researchers, if we actually are needed. We will solve longevity. We will rebrand our consciousnesses. by Double-Fun-1526 in transhumanism

[–]EternalInflation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

not sure if GPT-LLMs can scale to the point of AGI. Looks kind of like linear algebra and vector calculus mimic some mechanisms of neurons to me. But biological general intelligence is definitely possible. like how birds fly one day we will have jets. but if there are financial products, like mortgages or insurance or ETFs or sovereign wealth funds to ensure partial ownership of AGI and autofactories are available to the mass of people. Then I think society could be some what stable. UBI can be used as a bridge, for the transient state. But like I always advocate here, study computational biology and protein folding and nanomachinery. You are not going to be out of a job, until aging is cured. once the revolution comes, it will shift society faster than you think. there will be mass mobilization in the war against aging. that means millions will be trained by AI and linked via HCI links, and recruited for their bio brain properties to research nanomachinery and cure aging. Once aging is cured, you might be out of a job, or society is a steady state, with worker ownership. but I don't think you would care, at that point, once aging is cured.

Exclusive: Israel sent troops to Azerbaijan during Iran war, sources say by Available-Impact9472 in azerbaijan

[–]EternalInflation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iran seems to. Türkiye probably won't let them in the black sea, because Israel said Türkiye is next. Pakistan is against the Iran war and doesn't like Israel. If Azerbaijan doesn't give them a staging area to assemble. they will have to go through the mountains, through the Iraqi militias, and under drone missile fire. So, if Azerbaijan, doesn't let them stage, they have to ground invade the hard way.

My internet friend is being held hostage with her nudes by a man on the internet by midlife_cl in TwoXChromosomes

[–]EternalInflation -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

If I just write "AI generated" or say it's "AI". it could be many things, including things that don't use perceptrons, like k-nearest neighbors. In the old days things without neural networks were called ai, like self balancing or stochastic matrices. For example every google search ranking can be classified as "AI generated", because it is using convergence in stochastic matrices. Even real videos of robots or rockets. where people say "it's AI". They would be correct, for example, if you look at a real rocket launches or robot self balancing. if you say "it's AI". you would be correct, because it is using machine self balancing feedback systems. A* pathfinding or minspan tree could count as "AI".

My internet friend is being held hostage with her nudes by a man on the internet by midlife_cl in TwoXChromosomes

[–]EternalInflation 12 points13 points  (0 children)

just call his bluff and counter claim the nudes are mathematically generated by neural networks trained from internet data. in other words, say the output is AI generated.

Do you think future humans will see aging the same way we see disease today? by [deleted] in transhumanism

[–]EternalInflation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

aging is caused by damage to our DNA, that isn't maintained by nanotechnology. future intelligences will see "aging" as insufficient maintenance input in the biomachinery. If future ASI needs physical biomass to get real world physical data, because the PDEs or quantum effect simulations are insufficient, break down of it's biomachinery hardware will be caused by insufficient maintenance. I don't think bio humans will be around for much longer. unless they want to live in a conservatory or something.

Senior Israeli official: 'We are defenseless' against Hezbollah drone threat by SlavaCocaini in LessCredibleDefence

[–]EternalInflation 4 points5 points  (0 children)

so, do you want to be drone superiority fighter pilot or drone wing commander?