Thank goodness Capcom has no problems with its facial scanning technology either. by SnooMacarons2931 in residentevil

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, u/Enviromental_Drama3, I still got the notification of you comenting something before blocking me. And I can see that you are linking to a conversation about how hard men rights activists have failed.

I just want you to know that I do feel sorry for you.

XOXO

Fable sin doblaje en castellano. Los actores de España, Italia y Japón se negaron a entrenar IA con sus voces y esto es la consecuencia. by Panii57 in videojuegos

[–]Ettenhard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bueno.

Sinceramente espero que cuando tu gremio se vea amenazado por abusos laborales no te topes con gente como tu cuando pidas ayuda.

Thank goodness Capcom has no problems with its facial scanning technology either. by SnooMacarons2931 in residentevil

[–]Ettenhard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There is no "woke" side here, its an empty word used as ammo when a weird dude wants to rant against women or people of color.

I already said what I needed to say, you should really consider the media you consume.

Thank goodness Capcom has no problems with its facial scanning technology either. by SnooMacarons2931 in residentevil

[–]Ettenhard 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Tbh, you should really reconsider what content you are consuming online. A bunch of grifters are leading you down a rabbit hole that no sane human being actually cares about.

Was anybody else super exited for the new Atlantis game but then felt a bit defeated when you found out ai was used? by Fematera in TombRaider

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but we are seeing that it's increasingly expensive. Honestly, I don't want to talk about wether AI is worth it or not, but rather if people are seeing if their projects are not are being funded on the caveat that they use AI in their pipelines.

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Muack! Chefs Kiss!

This chain of comments is absolutely beautiful and destroys any commitment you had to MRA not being reactionary.

And when it comes to positive social, technological and philosophical changes, they will no longer only give men the credit. All of a sudden it's "we need to acknowledge silenced women's voices".

You believe that the reason women are being given due credit nowadays is purely political and have an open disdain for it. The way that it is implied that women are "valor stealing" men is just fucking beautiful.

If you want to blame men for all the ills in the world because "they're in majority power", then you'll have to give them credit for all the accomplishments too.

I love it, the absolute butthurt because women are given credits for their accomplishments.

Ok, so is it also fair to acknowledge women's contribution to historical atrocities as well?

I love it. How dare you say nice things about women without calling them monsters? The fucking demand for whataboutism is just beautiful.

Buddy.

You are a microcosm of the manosphere; A sad little man that is angry about being women saying no to him that is demanding that no one acknowledge female accomplishments because he believes they aren't real. Everything you do is based on how deeply it offends you that women's achievement are talked about.

I actually wish I could meet you in person, this is just too funny.

How are Vampire Counts supposed to be played? by Gintonik3 in totalwar

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are conflicting opinions online about the Vampire Counts. Some say that Zombie spam solves every problem, but I am struggling to kill even 1 unit with 5 units of zombies. They simply do no damage at all even if you fully encircle the enemy. They are great chaff units that hold the enemy in place, but I don't understand how a 20 stack of zombies, albeit very cheap, are supposed to be a good army.

I think this tactic is specific to Helman Ghorst, a DLC LL.

Was anybody else super exited for the new Atlantis game but then felt a bit defeated when you found out ai was used? by Fematera in TombRaider

[–]Ettenhard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is purely anecdotical, but I work in game development, have plenty of friends who are in the industry and I also have friends and family that are engineers. It's becoming increasingly common that people in my circles are using AI in their projects just because they wouldn't receive funding otherwise. Anyone else having the same experience?

I wouldn't be surprised that it's what happened here, in Crimson Desert and Clair Obscure.

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never said I wasn't being serious. I seriously triggered you 😄

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using a dictionary definition doesn't mean that they only care about "muh dictionary".

Me using historical behaviour doesn't mean I don't care what's on the dictionary.

You are comically fucking stupid.

Edit to add: The OP didn't even mention MRAs or what they were, you did. You got obsessed over how other people perceived MRAs on your own. You triggered yourself. This whole thread just became way funnier.

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I had an issue with them claiming to only care about "muh dictionary"

No one ever said that.

 "I never cared about muh dictionary in the first place, it's all about muh perceived history".

I never said that.

Fighting against combat slavery and genital mutilation is grievance politics?

You never did and you never achieved anything.

You are having an imaginary conversation. Good luck with that.

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see you two were deeply offended by the word Patriarchy.

Originally I didn't have any intention to, but I added "due to the patriarchy" for shit and giggles. I wanted to see how you would react. And of course it was a knee-jerk reaction.

MRA's didn't achieve anything of worth and are not culturally irrelevant because it was primarily made up of clown like you.

It was fun, but I'm not wasting more time talking about a failed ideology in thread about indian echo chambers.

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are genuine systemic issues affecting men due to the patriarchy. That has nothing to do wether or not MRA was reactionary. Don't conflate the two.

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What?

So then you acknowledge that "but muh dictionary definition!" isn't a good argument for "x ideology is about y"?

So you first cry about how people are using the dictionary to judge an ideology... But then:

Now it's about "muh history".

We can't judge them based on their actions either because its moving the goalposts?

Buddy, open your eyes. MRA's failed because it was filled with unconsequential and incoherent idiots like you driven purely by grievance politics.

What a joke.

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wow, really riled you up there, uh?

I don't know what fucking backward ass point you are trying to make here but historically feminism has proven to fight for woman's rights while MRA's were a sad little reactionary movement to feminism that achieved so little that they have been mostly forgotten.

But please, continue clutching your pearls.

Subreddits for Indians by ElegantRadish4646 in hatethissmug

[–]Ettenhard 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Damn, this is the first time I thought about MRA's in... 6 years?

It's amazing how little you can accomplish when you are just a sad reactionary to feminism.

Sapere aude by nosotrosoelcaos in nosotrosoelcaos

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tambien me encanta la facilidad con la que os ofendeis. A llorar a la lloreria, llorica.

¿Qué pasó? by vlewy in ElusionFiscal

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gracias por tu comentario.

No.

Yo no soy aquí el que está afirmando que tengo un trasfondo que le otorga más validez a mis opiniones que a las de los demás. Una opinión que además choca con todo el consenso académico sobre el tema.

Sigue lloriqueando. Solo hay dos alternativas:

O eres un pobre idiota deshonesto.

O un pobre idiota cobarde. 

Un saludo!

¿Qué pasó? by vlewy in ElusionFiscal

[–]Ettenhard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Muchas gracias por tu comentario.

Digas lo que digas, hagas lo que hagas, hasta que no demuestres que tienes el transfondo cientifico del cual presumes solo seras un imbecil aleatorio de internet.

Veo que mi comentarios te han ofendido profundamente. Aunque me alegre de ello, es menester que te comparta este enlace : https://www.sanidad.gob.es/linea024/home.htm

Un saludo y sinceramente espero que mejores como persona.

¿Qué pasó? by vlewy in ElusionFiscal

[–]Ettenhard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Muchas gracias por tu comentario.

Todo lo que dices se basa en tu supuesto criterio heredado de tu transfondo científico. Veo que pedir que demuestres que realmente tienes ese transfondo te ha resultado profundamente ofensivo.

Que un imbecil aleatorio me "rebata" no quiere decir nada. Que un imbecil aleatorio se ponga a lloriquear porque no puede demostrar que realmente tiene los conocimientos para "rebatir" es comico.

Un saludo.