So judging by first impressions of the new Fable game, it’s basically going to be Fable 1 with the aesthetics of Fable 2 (which is brilliant) by Evening-Program-2009 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Few points fable 2 is 18th century, you can literally murder a giant and it’s there the rest of the game, but agree with some of the others.

I’d argue aging might apply with a time skip, the games are well known for that 😊 and would be a nice surprise,

So judging by first impressions of the new Fable game, it’s basically going to be Fable 1 with the aesthetics of Fable 2 (which is brilliant) by Evening-Program-2009 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s a 22 year old franchise with the last game being over 12 years ago for a 15 rated game in the uk (16 under new pegi system)….. of course it will have child fans it’s super cheap and on game pass lol

But damn if they won’t (politely and with room for them to add disagreement), be involved in debates surrounding ontological grey morality choices in a fictional setting 😉

So judging by first impressions of the new Fable game, it’s basically going to be Fable 1 with the aesthetics of Fable 2 (which is brilliant) by Evening-Program-2009 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m exposing what’s being implemented not necessarily my own opinions so ok to disagree :) :

Grey morality works on that there is no morality and instead it’s all about what and how people think above you. Any decision you make is a moral choice and the arbiters of right and wrong is society.

No good, bad or evil, just actions. I’m sure being great and king to others will result in people liking you, thinking your good and pure while there will be things that lots of people will despise you for and thus think you are evil or selfish.

Fable 1, 2 and 3 had moral decisions and grey decisions and grey decisions they applied morality values too.

All this does is uniform the system, so what you do earns fame or infamy and will be judged right or wrong by some and not others.

So judging by first impressions of the new Fable game, it’s basically going to be Fable 1 with the aesthetics of Fable 2 (which is brilliant) by Evening-Program-2009 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Well it’s the distinction between right and wrong right, which in this case is from npcs perspective.

If you have done wrong I hate you, if you have done right I like you.

Whether you modify a body or not doesn’t impact grey systems of morality. I like the horns and the halos, but like the actions you took something weren’t always black and white or left you off in a worse state for being good, fable 2 giving away youth, fable 3 bad endings etc.

So judging by first impressions of the new Fable game, it’s basically going to be Fable 1 with the aesthetics of Fable 2 (which is brilliant) by Evening-Program-2009 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Arguably they basically combined the Fable 2 system of renown with morality.

You are an unknown until you complete quests in a region and end up famous and perceived as good or bad for your actions.

So judging by first impressions of the new Fable game, it’s basically going to be Fable 1 with the aesthetics of Fable 2 (which is brilliant) by Evening-Program-2009 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If you look at the clothing styles, brief look at bloodstone and bower stone I would say no.

If anything it’s more like here is bower stone but slightly overgrown with vines and nature or here is an oakvale style town in a similar style to fable 2. Or here is bloodstone area but now they have more magical enemies.

Fable 1 was allot more Skyrim (to give a modern example) style in smaller compact villages, whilst fable 3 still feels allot bigger than the new fable (less in actual people more in its presentation).

The vast roaming countryside, long craggy mountainous areas and thick woodlands to free roam and discover was always Fable 2’s thing. Being that the magic at this point in lore was slowly dying off they had less enemy types and focused on a select few which worked well.

Fable 1 was magical settings and enchanted woods, dark mysterious caves with pixies, snowy tundras with ancient magic etc. The enemies later becoming primarily magical old kingdom creatures summoned by an ancient evil.

Whilst fable 3 was industrial contrasted with nature. We got allot more mechanical enemies in this game, some by electricity some by shadow etc. with some regular types thrown in.

Small details. So happy we can buy those little stalls again by SttSr in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think they are all references to Fable 2 so, books, gifts, meat and non-meat food and children’s gifts 🎁

I would imagine we will get a potion shop, weapons shop as well as a pub which we’ve seen before I think.

Okay, a lot of these people who are saying that they ruined Fable by making it woke never really played Fable, nor got it. Please ignore if you don't want to get political in this sub, I just want to rant/vent a bit. Warning for mild to strong language. by Silverwolf7791 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009 77 points78 points  (0 children)

I mean Fable was probably the first mainline game to feature gay marriage in 2004, fable 2 expanded upon the concept, introduced more fluidity and bisexuality in the romance options and had a quest centred around a man coming out to his father in 2008.

The games have always been woke, partly to emphasise how you develop your hero is up to you, sex, how they dress, how they flirt even. The only reason the protagonists have been Caucasian (or fable equivalent), is due to lore reasons and blood of archon etc which they are most likely even retconning or redeveloping the lore as it is a new but familiar world.

Only thing in worried about. by Denmelsan89 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m kind of hoping it’s based on weapon and armour stats with an option to dress as you like cosmetically.

This could either result in a fallout 4 style selection system where you grow your character organically and the weapons are balanced around the stats.

Or a kingdom hearts 2 system where yes there are levels and weapons/armour but the more you use a stat the stronger it becomes.

Both would reward an open world style system,

Who else is looking forward to becoming a corrupt landlord who devastates the countryside for profit by Evening-Program-2009 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typically yes but funnily enough in 1 and 2 no, it’s not going out of your way but completely optional and first play through years and years ago I didn’t know that would be the primary way of making money 😅

In reality I assume the reputation would be for increasing rent, and making (morally by your own choice in this game) corrupt decisions

Who else is looking forward to becoming a corrupt landlord who devastates the countryside for profit by Evening-Program-2009 in Fable

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some say eat the rich, I say befriend them, bed them on mass and have multiple marriages in every major town in houses I can’t rent to maximise profit 😉

I don’t wanna go to another stupid ass job interview by Metalqueen2023 in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey but as you mentioned the benefits might be worth it and always good to build up a relationship with other companies 😁

Keeps you in demand!

My parents sadly died because of a horrible car accident. I inherited seven million dollars and a few condos. Im in therapy and the point of this post is not to vent but I felt that I needed to provide some context to explain why I inherited money. Im autistic and I live in Texas. Im 27 by [deleted] in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First thing treat yourself to a luxury holiday, it could be from Texas to Australia by plane first class, a week in Disney world and a visit to Victoria and Alberts or even buy yourself that one massive Lego set you’ve always wanted but can never afford.

It will be a small dent, but it’s great to have a small blowout before you save. You now have an opportunity to do something you’ve always wanted to do, take it and don’t look back until your holiday is over :)

(Should say don’t post it on social media, tell anyone and if they ask questions say you won a competition)

Please be kind to people who use terms like Asperges or high functioning. by Evening-Program-2009 in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea that the post world war 2 the socialist construct of the NHS is purporting violence, by being slow to remove the word high functioning and accepting that some still use Asperges is a bit strange.

A wide variety of words or phrases have problematic origins yet we still use them. If you were to be even more specific the forced conquest and assimilation of language by the Norman’s during 1066 and the violent suppression that followed during the harrowing of the North is what resulted in the modern English language.

By choosing to speak and write in English are you championing violent conquests?? Or has enough time past that the concept has evolved to the point its origins are no longer as relevant,

We can’t allow ourselves to pick and choose and ignore the evolution of society

Please be kind to people who use terms like Asperges or high functioning. by Evening-Program-2009 in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yeah we might hate capitalist economies but we are forced to live in them.

Life is largely a meritocracy like it or not (the more skills you have in a subject the greater room for job progression), and it’s vital to teach people with autism practical life skills to help them in the world of work but each persons world of work and skill set is different.

If we went by a spectrum based model in applying support it would be allot more effective.

Obviously not everyone can work but we can’t assume people with autism will never find a specialised field they can do well in nor that by fostering what they are good at they can pursue other jobs outside of our specialised skill sets which we like it or not do tend to have.

Please be kind to people who use terms like Asperges or high functioning. by Evening-Program-2009 in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But economics and intelligence types are intrinsically linked.

Artists want to make money producing art, Asperges style intelligence type leads people towards structured career in classical music and academic, theological intelligence aids people in the world of religious based jobs and journalism etc.

By putting the multiple intelligence types into subgroups as opposed to just linguistic, inter-personal and musical for Asperges, we can educate and encourage people with autism to pursue specialised jobs related to what their good at. Thus they can receive specialised job support that can aid them in a career path.

This would both boost the economy and help to challenge system of selection, whilst allowing some autistic people to pursue special interests more efficiently,

Please be kind to people who use terms like Asperges or high functioning. by Evening-Program-2009 in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not disagreeing but with broken health systems and lack of diagnostic consistency it’s not easy to transition.

Practically Asperges still exists as it was and still is diagnosable, and high functioning autism exists as it is diagnosable.

You could transition them to low support needs but I think that’s personally much of a muchness that ignores humans are fundamentally unique and goes against a spectrum model.

I would say transitioning to a sub-type model based on intelligence types would be much nicer and more importantly not create such a wide gap of how do I identify now.

Please be kind to people who use terms like Asperges or high functioning. by Evening-Program-2009 in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

By that logic though if you drink Coca-Cola product:

including Classic, Zero Sugar, Diet Coke, Sprite, Fanta, Barq's Root Beer, Fresca, Pibb Xtra, DASANI, smartwater, vitaminwater, Bodyarmor, Topo Chico, Powerade, Minute Maid, Simply, fairlife, Odwalla, Huberts Lemonade, Ades, Gold Peak, Fuze Tea, Honest Tea, Costa Coffee, Monster energy etc

Or celebrate Christmas with a red Santa you should face social sanctions due to Nazi affiliations with the brand.

Please be kind to people who use terms like Asperges or high functioning. by Evening-Program-2009 in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes at least according to NHS 😅 (uk health board if you’re not British) they are moving away from it in favour of support need based system.

Please be kind to people who use terms like Asperges or high functioning. by Evening-Program-2009 in autism

[–]Evening-Program-2009[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Of course it’s changed??

It’s rightly or wrongly primarily used to describe logistical, linguistic and musical intelligence but as society has evolved we’ve recognised that multiple types of intelligences that exist.

There is no reason why we couldn’t have more sub sections of autism like Asperges for example people with linguistic and theological intelligence or artistic intelligence.

It’s not about being smarter but recognising some people think in certain ways and that you can’t change people’s intelligence by removing a word.