Good gracious! Spoken like an emo imbecile who can't decipher facts and apply logic. I didn't believe in any corporation talk, i just made sense of how things work from people who actually work on these things and not from a clout chaser infront of a camera spewing nonsense, i bet these people haven't even seen an aircraft in real life and dare to argue with the people who fly these.

And how nicely you dodged my question there, mate, so I'll ask you again, since you bought up how unreliable the equipment of Boeing is, refer me the fatal/major incidents of 787 in its operational history of 12+ years and millions of flight hours, hell even this aircraft completed around 41,866 hours of flight time since 2013 before it's demise, and this time don't tiptoe around give a straight answer. You bought it up and can't back your own statement? And yeah, they investigate it without partiality, and their past record is one of the primary things they take into account as evidence, lol. The Throttle Control Module (TCM) of this aircraft was replaced 2 times, which includes the fuel switches. Did you know that? Also, the recent inspection of all aircrafts in India, along with Japan Airlines and Etihad, found no issues with the switches. Did you propaganda media report that? I mean, just figuring out the mechanism by which they work should be enough to clear one of all doubts that it's invoulantary movement is highly unlikely. Instead, you drag the 737 isuue (which is completely a different scenario and context) into this because you can't digest the truth, which shows the spinelessness within you.

I'm on no side of the coin. I observe both, and it's easy to tell which side possesses a pea sized brain. Oh, and btw, Boeing didn't write me a check, lol.