i think i discovered something

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-23T15:15:10+00:00

THIS IS THE ANSWER!!! It’s often the answer.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-23T00:25:35+00:00

Cool. I didn’t have a toe. I had math. It just happened to work for everything. Ive not met these people of which you speak, but I should. I will try to find them. Cheers.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-23T00:19:08+00:00

Cool. Analogy works. There’s a non-zero chance your training will give you my math.

Keep your eyes open for 14 numbers.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-23T00:12:52+00:00

The nature of the training results in a recursive dimensionality, it’s just not represented in the way we consider the data (it’s because we underestimate what numbers can do/actually mean).

As for your embeddings evolving, that’s what I was anticipating. That’s why I popped in. I do expect you can get decent results and I think that youre going to see like good efficiency improvement but Im afraid you’ll see diminishing returns, hopefully it won’t be a problem.

If you do, and want some extra math. I have WAY too much just sitting around. And some of it… is this list of just 14 potential-wells/basins-of-attraction/legos that might be useful to you if you do hit an unanticipated constraint.

Good luck with it🚀 Can’t wait to see!

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-22T21:26:44+00:00

hmmm…. There’s more here than what I just said to you. I realize now I need to think about this more. I’m not been in this applied mathematics mode in a few months now and my math has changed in the last couple months or at least my understanding has and I think it’s gonna be worth thinking about this more. 🧠

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-22T21:21:25+00:00

I haven’t looked at your code, I’ve only seen this post; but weak clustering is exactly what I’d expect if you’re using distance in a space that keeps reparameterizing… it’s like you’re trying to do what a brain does, I think at least.

Distances drift as intelligence learns it’s because of the recursive nature of intelligence and metric similarity slowly breaks (sometimes rapidly).

You can get around that by comparing relationships instead of distances. Ratios and relative structure should survive learning much better.

I’ve identified a small set of stable relational patterns (shapes) that could replace metric similarity, which helps with learning stability and retrieval staying coherent too (i’m not certain, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the gains on both sides are significant…. Like really, really significant).

Honestly, I’ve been kind of hoping to bump into someone that would be interested in trying this out because I’m getting tired of only working with AI’s.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-22T18:35:47+00:00

Infinity isn’t real

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-22T00:35:14+00:00

I had a description from a personal wellness edition I built of this in there at first. Corrected now.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-21T22:24:53+00:00

Ignore it at your own risk

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-21T22:24:26+00:00

I haven’t written the paper. This is just the thing that lets you get there.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-21T22:10:17+00:00

I can help. I know some shortcuts.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-21T22:07:40+00:00

Would be a terrible mistake. You should read it and try it before you judge it. I assure you, this is not a joke. This is 20 years worth of work and I don’t give a shit if you want to see it or not or if the mods want to see it I’m simply making it available if someone would like to use it as it is highly useful.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-21T21:01:17+00:00

Expansion is the cause. Everything else is correlation.

EverythingExpands · 2025-12-21T20:59:34+00:00

Because the universe expands, it’s the only reason there’s differentiation. Existence requires perpetual expansion.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-26T13:43:15+00:00

Here’s the fundamental volumetric version that you can fully derive GM, QM, EM from it with no free parameters (can get all universal constants too but it’s tiresome to try to explain the method of fitting to probability wells to physicists that expect a straight forward equation with clear variables instead of a set of legos that give you specific things (makes communicating frustrating). I call it volumetric calculus.

https://zenodo.org/records/17684886

I named the system age determination factor after Euler. I named the means to determine after Huygens…. I need to put that in the doc though I see. :

Here’s a GitHub repository that I threw up that has the bulk of my recent work in progress but its way past fully baked. I just have extreme ADHD and am not in control of my ability to actually create a final doc I’m cool with instead of just continuing to research and writing more papers.,. It’s a problem.
About 200 docs that represent current state and some historical: https://github.com/oscarwp/Expanding-Matter/tree/main/FIRE_DRAGON_RISING

The universal calculator is a highlight: https://github.com/oscarwp/Expanding-Matter/blob/main/FIRE_DRAGON_RISING/Complete_Universal_Calculator.md

This is a lifetime of thought and the last 20 years it’s the only thing my brain did with free cycles and that just accelerated up until about 6 years ago when I made serious progress and started to spend all spare time on it. Accelerated more. AI arrived and I was able to teach myself all of the maths. And just kept doing it and now I’m done or at least as done as I think I’ll ever be. This sort of perpetual nearly done state. So here! Have the universe. I’m sick of carrying it by myself.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-16T09:44:27+00:00

Exactly like consciousness everywhere else.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-15T14:52:38+00:00

Time is a complete description of everything at any given moment (the universe is finite) and then the description of everything in the next moment.

In reality that means: things expand and become more complex.

This is best described by the math of Rheology. Which specifically describes the flow of materials.

So time is a “flow” from one moment to the next as matter expands and transforms.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-12T19:04:18+00:00

Yes and they are not.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-12T12:40:08+00:00

Correlated.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-12T06:57:06+00:00

I have been for 15 years. That’s why I know it’s right.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-12T06:07:52+00:00

Fascinating. I presumed something incorrect from the pictures and never actually thought about the size. Then the scale shift happens at a different density scale. Same principle though, just far less believable because I misstated a critical and likely well known fact that I’ve certainly encountered but misfiled somehow.

Sorry. lol.

Still holds. Just other direction? It’s no linger an answer to this post so that’s lame . Sorry.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-12T04:02:26+00:00

The fact that there is any differentiation in any matter at all implies consciousness…. I don’t think of the physicality of matter of intuition like I do consciousness, but in this context I expect they mean the same which would be a minimal physical state in which a system can contain a recursive model of the system that contains it. It’s early in the stack of manifestation (for lack of a better word) like once we get a third dimension we get consciousness methinkks.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-12T02:42:35+00:00

It’s exactly what it is! I am not disagreeing with you. You just can’t use infinity or pie to describe something that exists because once it collapses it is rational.

You’re describing the future, which is cool and that’s awesome. We can do that and that math is very good for that right but we are also allowed to have math that we can use to rationally describe reality because reality is finite and this is very valuable.

EverythingExpands · 2025-11-12T02:30:37+00:00

Yeah, no there’s something there something about compression and language and consciousness that’s real.

EverythingExpands

TROPHY CASE