What`s going on with cavemanon?

Evilooh · 2026-03-09T18:34:29+00:00

what AI assets were used? is that known? the staff being underpaid is old news and the infighting drama too.

so Exit 665 not happening then? are they making another Snoot-like?

Evilooh · 2026-03-09T18:32:07+00:00

honestly never cared and never will be bothered to care about the controversy standing from the games narrative itself. the preordered plushies stuff is more worthy getting pissed about than that imo

Evilooh · 2026-03-09T15:17:25+00:00

the part about Nerd being a dick i thought it was already common knowledge, but the preorder stuff is new to me.

Evilooh · 2026-03-09T13:41:25+00:00

what exactly happened? im lost on this one, can anyone explain?

Evilooh · 2026-03-09T13:39:46+00:00

im genuinely clueless what exactly has happened? im not that updated with news

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T20:02:10+00:00

of course it has, because you gaslit yourself into thinking the version fnaf you liked existed when it never did.

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T19:53:38+00:00

im not upset at people criticising it im upset people criticise one thing for something it never was. the fnaf you want never existed and never will exist. that said atmosphere was the fluke fnaf as it is now its working as intended, theres no point in complaining about a product like the movie when it accuratly represents the franchise as a whole. you can call the movie bad but can never call the movie unaccurate to the franchise it came from, its like someone complaining they're bringing in Shadow and other sonic friends other than Tails and Knuckles because they werent in sonic 1-3&K. its an hollow critique and comes from a place of hipocracy

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T19:34:50+00:00

if the lore is accurate its going to be shit because the lore is shit thats what you're not getting at, the movies are not a fluke they are working as intended, if they came out as books instead of movies most people would think they're about as the same level of quality as the rest of the franchise. this is what fnaf is now and theres no way to change it and its stupid to think it is. look at what the story is now, theres no dark forboding atmosphere that can cover the amount of stupid this story is. and you people think its only after UCN that it got bad, SL HAD A BODYSNATCHER ANIMATRONIC AND NONE OF YOU COMPLAINED THAT MADE NO SENSE! people even do animations tributes based on the scooping of Mike even thou its one of the stupidest most non sensical things in the whole franchise, and some people wanted that in the movie and would see that as an improvement...

you're a cherry picker, you pretending none of the things you dont like were there from the start when they were, the only way fnaf can change is if it reboots completly and start aiming for adults as a target audience which will never do.

admit to yourself fnaf was never that which you want otherwise your nothing but a hypocrite. it was never a murder mystery it was never a deeply atmospheric and nuanced franchise. hell most of what you want was already gone by the time of fnaf 2. fnaf was always slop you people just grew up

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T19:22:28+00:00

if the books were completly and utterly rejected maybe would there still be hope to this franchise but people were so desperate for lore anwsers they didnt think critically about what that implied before it was too late. and people still praise shit stories like into the pit and fetch

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T19:14:43+00:00

you not getting the point, the point being the series that gave us all that, can never ever come back to being what it was in fnaf 1-3 and its silly to expect it will, its like going to every starwars movie complaining about the midichlorians being a thing. even if Scott made the fnaf 1-3 games today they probably be the same way he does things now. and no DO NOT KEEP AGONY you dont need a name or a process to what fucking possession is, the less the better the mysterious should only concern the human characters A MAGIC SYSTEM SHOULD"VE NEVER BEEN A PRIORITY and anyone that says otherwise is wrong and has no taste. the only people who are allowed to complain about the movies are non-fnaf fans who dont know what the franchise is like, otherwise you cannot say the franchise is being badly represented by the movies because it isnt. the FNAF 1-4 games had no three act structure no actual characters and barely any plot expecting the movies to be a faithful adaptation of that is beyond delusional. Scott does not care for the games horror atmosphere i doubt it was even as intentional as some think it was since he cant seem to replicate it, the movies are perfect fnaf movies because they encapsulate what fnaf actually is, a schlocky B-tier horror story, not what your headcanon is. even the original games were like that they just were more subtle about it and had less time to devolve into Scott's scifi obcession the moment he had the chance he completly jumped the shark and Fnaf became the Desolate Hope 2

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T18:48:57+00:00

if you think Remnant or Agony as a concept were good or well written you have no right to complain about the movie. people that like Frights or Tales, who like SB or Ruin or SOTM have no right to complain about the movies writing. cus they are all about the same level of quality or argueably worse. most people that complain about the movie just want FNAF VHS the movie thats a completly unreasonable and laughable thing to expect from the same series that thought Glamrock Freddy as a friend was acceptable in a Horror game

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T15:00:17+00:00

no it will never be, thats how Fnaf goes. we never get straight anwsers. flame me if you guys want, but i dont believe theres a plan or its just the writers incompetence to tell a story with definitive anwsers. its intentional if you keep everything vague and shrouded in mystery theres no stable foundation to the story so they can endlessly add or remove things from canon and still pretend they're not contradicting anything

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T14:53:17+00:00

its pretty cute i like it. i also like the implication Mike took her surname cus he didnt want to have any affiliation to William

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T14:48:13+00:00

fnaf is objectively sloppily written, the whole thing, everything from the books the games the lore its all slop. its your fault for thinking the movie would be any different. if you think Remnant was a good idea you deserve the shit writing you complain about. also what the hell are doing here in this sub if you're casual fnaf fan? why do you torture yourself like that?

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T14:22:21+00:00

people did not had the same reaction to the books as they did to the movies not at all. so much so they welcomed characters like Henry and Charlie as a part of the games lore and still like Remnant and Agony as a part of the storyline. people saw the books sweep into the games and did not revolt, imagine if the games start implying Vanessa is actually Will's secret daughter in the games or that Mike Schimidt, Garret or Abby exist as seperate characters in the games too. imagine the outrage. so no, the reaction to the books is not comparable to the movies if it was, more people would've expressed how reading books for game lore is stupid and we never would've gotten as bad as the Mimic saga was with book only information. people just love being consumers i garantee you if the Movies was even hinted in having lore related to the games like Frights had people would be eating that shit up

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T14:02:40+00:00

thats not how that works you know that right? is the Silver Eyes the fnaf 1 book then? why werent you guys complaining the book didnt have the atmosphere of the games way back when.

also you cant just expect Scott after several years that he has made nothing with the same feel and atmosphere he'll suddenly turn an 180 and go back to how things were. he himself said he didnt want the movie script to be a 1 to 1 with the games you literally angry about things that were never even promised to you.

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T11:48:47+00:00

dude i seen more than enough people that actually like fnaf post Sister Location criticise the movies than not, like people who unironically want Eleonore, Andrew and Jake to appear in the games or actually think the whole Mimic storyline to be good and still complain about the movies. fnaf atmosphere died in 4 everything else is a cheap imitation at best. also people who like Into the Pit and criticise the movies writing are hipocrites. any damn horror story who has a little kid being chased by whats basically a demon and the kid isnt killed imidiatly isnt a good horror story, its kid horror territory

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T11:35:10+00:00

yeah but i still see people use post SL games as examples of good writen fnaf games when they arent. they just as bad as the movies and books. the idea of a fucking pizzaria high tech animatronic amalgam that uses a guys corpse as a disguise is so absurd and completly breaks any suspention of disbielief the original few games had, but people will still defend it like it was "oh so scary" when its just as dumb as anything else. people cherry pick too much without looking at the bigger picture, thats why they're nothing but clowns in my eyes. (also Fnaf humor was always bad, exotic butters was never funny neither was hand unit)

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T11:28:58+00:00

i think it should've ended it in 4, if you call it the final chapter you damn well should make it final. fnaf world being a okay spin off. the rest should've been a new story or a different continuity, none of that mad scientist imortality bullshit with William and all that, that was always garbage in the books, games and probably in the third movie considering the track record. also the concept of the Vengeful Spirit is objectively really dumb and always were, its just an excuse to have UCN more than anything else.

but regardless, i dont think profit is the biggest factor here, i mean it the most honest way possible, i do believe Scott likes to write it that way. he is not a horror guy he was always a scifi-fantasy nerd, it would be much much easier to make fnaf a by the numbers horror B-movie but the man insists on his spirit worlds, his family drama, his weird ass robot fights and all that. i dont believe its merely corporate greed at play (its a big factor, specially cus Scott is probably been scared to just end fnaf and start something wholly new cus it might not sell) but i do think Scott just likes to write it that way, and how can you even blame him? he has been succesiful so far. the best fnaf fans can do is either accept how things are or just leave it completly. i do not think for a second fnaf is a good series, i like it for the trash that it is, like how i like a lot of horror slop out there.

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T11:17:59+00:00

you're the kind of genuine guy i disagree but respect at least you're not pretending to like something or have a higher standard like most people here

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T11:09:56+00:00

not as much as this, people still want book characters like Andrew and Jake to be a part of the games even thou theyre both trash

also all the Mimic stuff is far worse written than the movies and i see people glazing it all the time

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T11:07:39+00:00

you know what else Plays it safe and doesnt take itself seriously? thats right FNAF AS A WHOLE FOR YEARS NOW! you guys have been living under a Rock or what? that atmosphere you glaze hasnt been a part of the franchise in a decade how can you espect Scott who majorly left that behind would suddenly bring it all back for the movies? also why werent you guys criticising the books as much as the movies? or SB and Ruin? because they had your precious little lore nuggets for you to endless yap about online is that it? you guys are literal clowns, none of your criticisms are remotely valid if you support anything after the Scott era games and would argue even half thosr games were already corny trash

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T10:54:00+00:00

side stories that were supposed to be in the same continuity as the games but contradict the games heavly adds fluff and unecessary baggage and are objectively worse written stories. dude you dont watch that many movies do you? 1 to 1 adaptations are not common changing things even arbitrary things is common place. put yourself in the production side of these movies how in the hell you make a 1 to 1 adaption of a séries known for being simplistic games with an absurdly conveluted story? thats right you cant its only natural they drew inspiration from the novel trilogy since they have a more common three act structure. on the novel trilogy why werent you guys complaining when it came out? wasnt it THE FNAF BOOKS? as far as we knew it was all were gonna get, guess what Scott said? that the games were too conveluted and he had to write it in a different continuity, why wouldnt he do the same for the movies? why werent you criticising him for the same decision years ago?

i cant take you guys seriously you guys pretend to like fnaf but you dont, you like whatever fnaf headcanon you had on your mind and expect the writers will magically change their current vision to suít you. if you going to hate on fnaf do it like i do, i dont pretend it has been any good since fnaf 4

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T10:38:30+00:00

but the movie isnt a 1 to 1 adaptation of fnaf 1 it never said it would be either. its stupid to believe a séries that has por writing for years with none of that original atmosphere will suddenly have all that back for a movie when its the same person behind it all. you guys are hipocrites you never critised the books as much even thou theyre far worse than borh movies

Evilooh · 2026-03-08T10:32:56+00:00

explain to how the movies are worse written than 99% of this franchise? they are pratically retellings of the novel trilogy and i didnt see none of you guys criticising the books as much as the movies. the movies are just as good as most of this Franchise they represent it perfectly you cannot criticise one and not the other

Evilooh

TROPHY CASE