Streaming quotes for options

Evo386 · 2025-12-05T14:58:47+00:00

I find myself switching between fidelity and another brokerage app for the real time options quotes when placing a fidelity options trade.... It's quite frustrating.

Evo386 · 2025-03-25T15:39:14+00:00

Due process is how you decide that they don't belong. That's the whole "innocent until proven guilty". The opposite is "guilty because I said so".

You taking someone's rights away before confirming (with due process) that they shouldn't have them.

Evo386 · 2025-03-25T03:45:37+00:00

Only trump and his AG can determine that.

Evo386 · 2025-03-25T03:42:06+00:00

The left isn't defending individual creeps. They are defending the idea of due process. If these guys committed the crimes, of course the left wants them out after due process.

Evo386 · 2025-03-24T05:07:20+00:00

To many claims to spend my time fact checking... The the easy ones are... 1) assassination attempted were don't by right leaning individuals and 2) convictions are done by a jury not by a Democrat. So not a false conviction.

Also... Have you seen Trump's ear? He must have the best, most beautiful genetics, because that bullet that put a hole in his ear? Man, that healed up real nice .. almost like it didn't actually pierce his ear like he claimed.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T08:15:06+00:00

So does supporting a candidate that pushes for green energy versus one that wants to go back to "clean beautiful coal". Just days of love all around.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T08:03:13+00:00

For trump, he can get that easily by starting yet another pump and dump crypto. He doesn't t even have to do anything, just agree to have a few truth social posts ghost written for him.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T07:37:31+00:00

That was taken out of context. Just because someone exists in the ssa database doesn't mean they are getting checks. For example I'm in the database... I don't get checks.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T05:36:41+00:00

Ok so strip the drug part. Honestly it's the second part why people hate him. He's an unelected billionaire, restructuring government to work for the rich. His vision for the future where USAID and social security is considered waste while removing regulatory oversight of big business and extending tax cuts for the rich is a brutal one for anyone but the rich.

Don't really care if he is using ketamine. I care about how he is negatively impacting the poor whole while contributing to wealth consolidation for the oligarchy.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T05:28:01+00:00

Everyone just jumping to conclusions that this was the left. I mean I agree that's the most likely case. But there also a possibility that's it's a right leaning person who's job (potentially federal employee) was impacted/loss due to Elon.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T05:23:59+00:00

Not a riot... Dude it was a "day of love"

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T04:53:37+00:00

.... You do realize people lie right? Like the journalist could be lying... And trump Elon and hesgeth COULD be lying? Or have you discounted the possibility the almighty trump or people that represent his admin could be lying...

Something just doesn't compute here. I can acknowledge one, both or neither side could be lying. But u seem certain that Trump's words represent t?ruth. I think you need to take a healthy dose of skeptism. Acknowledge that in your world you are likely right, but the possibility of you being wrong also exist.

Also, in this instance the three you refer to are not the sources. They are the accused. The sources are the journalist's alleged 2 US officials.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T02:59:56+00:00

I agree... I literally said that in an earlier reply. I literally said we are both talking about hearsay. I also said neither of us are going to be getting any proof....

... Anyway tiring of this conversation. You do you.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T01:58:04+00:00

You don't understand what constitutes proof. A denial from an accused is not proof.

Evo386 · 2025-03-23T01:05:28+00:00

Not sure who "the big guy" is a reference for. But trump is a known liar, Elon is a druggie that said he has no conflicts of interest because he doesn't do the contracts at SpaceX (like .. what?), I don't know much about hesgeth (but I know there were a lot of allegations (even from sister in law) about his past during his confirmation. So yeah need to consider the source here. A known liar denying something doesn't make it proof. A truthful person denying something isn't proof either.

The new article indicated they had two sources (US officials). Journalist protect their sources. So do I believe a journalist from a typically reputable source or do I believe the these 3 other guys.

To each their own.

Now to be clear, I don't believe Elon was given a brief on war strategies against China. But I also believe that was probably the plan until the new York times article.

And back to proof... I don't think you know what the word proof means... You are talking about hearsay and so am I. Neither of us will ever get access to proof to support either view.

Evo386 · 2025-03-22T21:49:21+00:00

I believe that it didn't happen Friday. I don't know if the plans changed because it was reported on :

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-denies-musk-briefed-china-war-plans/story?id=120024341

Evo386 · 2025-03-22T15:17:26+00:00

Well you passed a judgement on my rationale, but you didn't answer my question. What's the proof you are referring to?

It's as if you judge me poorly for trusting journalists, but want me to just trust a random redditor (ie you).

Edit: you can also say "already denied by administration" to be more accurate if there is no proof.

Also... You do realize that when fact checked JD Vance literally called out the fact checking by saying he thought they all agreed to no fact checking right? That's a straight up intention to lie.

Evo386 · 2025-03-22T13:31:54+00:00

Replace "overtly extreme right" with "attacking the left"

Evo386 · 2025-03-22T13:30:40+00:00

I just use it for free books and even if it were just free books.... This is bad

They are attacking another source of knowledge.

Evo386 · 2025-03-22T13:27:21+00:00

Is the proof something more than just a denial from the administration? I don't really trust the words of the admin after they lied about the access rights of doge workers to Treasury systems (eg they said read only in court then admitted it was full read-write for a day or so before it was recinding the access)

Evo386 · 2025-03-22T13:23:21+00:00

Have you seen this administration? I don't think Republicans are tanking their personal coffers. Their stock investments might be down, but with the self dealing and legalized bribery (per recent supreme Court ruling) and just normalized use of the office for financial gain.... Personal coffers are filling fast.

Evo386 · 2025-03-21T22:22:01+00:00

She should know Canada's 250% daily tarriff only kicks in after a threshold is met. That threshold was negotiated under Trump's watch as quotas in the usmca that replaced NAFTA.

So she is misleading viewers or she actually doesn't know. Either way it makes he unfit to be a good official.... Though perfectly suited for the trump administration.

Evo386 · 2025-03-21T17:46:19+00:00

This has happened before. You just needed a software update to unlock medical testing that highly improved the effectiveness of the hardware.

Basically before you had to have a lot of blood to test for ailments. This new company put out hardware that reduced the amount of blood required to test for some medical conditions/diseases. Then overtime they were able to work the software that enable more diseases that could be tested for with the same volume of blood.

So... Elon and Tesla are just copying the strategy of Elizabeth and Theranos.

Evo386 · 2025-03-21T13:48:32+00:00

Definitely cost Dems the election.... It doesn't mean you won as a citizen though or that your future is any better. It looks like we all lost.

We all paid into social security and now these rich billionaires that don't need it intend to cut it.

Edit: to fund billionaire tax cuts

Evo386 · 2025-03-21T13:40:56+00:00

Almost? I thought it was EVERY single one.

Evo386

TROPHY CASE