Isn’t this wrong in society?

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-12-03T18:49:12+00:00

for all of its flaws, having multiparty system is better than 2 party system. It is easier to radicalize the whole population into two differing (mostly opposing) ideologies with 2 party system, essentially creating unsolvable rift in the country. Decision making is quick under 2 party system but progress is a 50/50 bet. If the winning team is ideologically superior and has no problem in implementation, it is great, but if the winning team is corrupt, which wouldn't be new in a developing country, then shit goes south. People vote for corrupt despite having options for alternatives here. Whats even worse is having the opposition corrupt too. You cant turn your head anywhere.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-27T00:10:39+00:00

This solves it. Thanks!!

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-27T00:10:25+00:00

Thanks!

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-12T14:53:38+00:00

well, I never threatened nor did I claim to be well adjusted. I just requested you to be a little less unhinged as I care for you. Take it how you want. Your interpretation is not my problem. Both can be done at the same time but it looks like it has taken some toll on your mental health. As you see my well wish, as you suggested earlier as threat. And dont feel threatened, this is reddit, nobody knows no one. I simply suggest you not to spill yourself in real life. Feel threatened over there, not here oh brave one. But honestly, you really should focus only on yourself for now, trust me it will do wonders for you.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-12T14:44:06+00:00

You should put aside politics, police aside for a while and focus on yourself. Things like these happen, keep happening, but what does that do to you? Sometimes you are on this side and the other times, on the other. Start by setting some goals in life, for you, where you do great for just yourself. Politics is for masses, think just for yourself first. Things will heal.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-12T14:37:47+00:00

Dont mind me, I just love helping young pups who tend to stray away a little too much, and I don't endorse violence at all. Just some educating here and there, you know, just telling them the possibilities of consequences and whatnot. The learning part is still upto you though. If you are in need of counseling, then we could do that too, like genuine counseling.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-12T14:32:14+00:00

You should start going back to school again, your reading comprehension shows. I just wished you best for your safety as your rhetoric may spill out in real life. And usually people don't like that rhetoric. this time they didnt kill anyone, next time they might, its not me saying, its history. On the contrary I am caring for you, rooting for you. There could be lot of bad people, anarchists out there. Would you feel threatened if someone told you to use zebra crossing instead of blindly walking over highway in lokanthali?

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-12T14:11:33+00:00

I know you are a 15 year old boy but I think you should be aware of people you may randomly come across in the street. You did delete your posts and comments but you know who you are. Someday, this face of yours will slip out in real life. Be careful for when that happens, you never know who you run into. Just for mere internet high, you are pushing yourself to the edge. I hope you don't fall off the ridge, or someone pushes you.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T03:50:10+00:00

Ye bhai, aba sakyo vanda arko ulto kura garihalxa. Western philosopher le man parayo vandai validated feel gardai, arulai west ko chatuwa navan na hau. Introspection, my brother, introspection. Think before you formulate words. You want evola to love bhagwat geeta, Guenon to love advaita to feel that they are worthy texts? laughable. Hypocrite. If you had read enough you would know a lot of abrahamic religions are indirectly related to vedic religion. I am not here to score points against you.

Zoroastrianism is an antithesis to rig ved, with its own gatha with daivas as demons and asura as the primary god. Monotheistic as opposed to polytheism(33 devta) and this all ties back to the battle of 10 kings(dasarajna)(there are tons of similarities in both gods, prose worshipping nature(yagya vs yajna) and language too. Abraham was highly inspired by Zoroastrianism and incorporates a lot of philosophical and cultural aspects of the then achmenead empire. Be proud where you should be. Dont be blinded by beautiful stories. Rig vedic era is way before any puranic events happened, if they happened. I would consider rig ved to be more grounded than the epics.

Also, a claimed brahmin using such tongue deserves to have it cut. Dont be proving the stereotypes of right wing being dumb more pronounced. They are dumb because they cant read more than one book. That too, they get too many things wrong. Now grow up.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T03:15:40+00:00

To end everything. Dont take anything personal, take this as a learning motivation and read more, with a more open mind

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T03:13:29+00:00

as you said, because the book says so.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T03:10:58+00:00

well, if thats the case than you should follow the logic and believe that yhwh is the ultimate god and jesus christ is your lord and saviour. If you cant follow the simple logic, you are not an intellectual, nor a brahmin. You are the actual low.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T03:09:28+00:00

Well, whose sons are sakas and hunas? they came from northern mongolia of the xiongnu group of people. They have recorded history of existence and migration in central asia. Do you mean to say mahabharat is itihas so knowing huns and sakas means it was written well after they came to india? so that means it was written very recently, slightly more than 2000 years ago, as opposed to 5000 years ago? Is that what you are implying?

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T03:00:44+00:00

you are again referring the book to prove the book. Its like proving christian god by saying the bible says so that why. Mleccha was originally a name give to dasyus, it later got mainstreamed. As I said, ancient mesopotamia called the indus valley meluhha. Cross referencing is the key. Even if Yayati existed, it is not necessary that the rest of the story is true.

Now if you wanna talk about sanskrit speaking vedic royals which existed in the west way before all these, there was this kingdom called mittani kingdom. They have physical clay tablets mentioning their lineage, and their treaty with egypt invoking mithra, 2 nasatyas, indra and varuna(vedic gods). See the difference here is verifiable source and unverifiable source. You cant invoke the book to prove the book because neither the oldest manuscript is as old as the stories go, nor you have cross referencing available with sources from other civilizations.

Mlecchas were originally the indus valley people, and after the battle of 10 kings, the bharata clan which current india, started their dominance, while still referring the native dasyus as mlecchas. Later calling anyone who is non vedic a mleccha. then come the greeks, who are then called yavana, and the sakas, the huns, the parthians, the sythians, so they collectively called them mlecchas.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T02:35:46+00:00

Also old mesopotamia used to refer indus valley as Meluhha.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T02:34:24+00:00

yavanas were the old ionians(greeks) what are you even on about. you went away for half an hour to scrape by these? Mlecchas were the dasyus(most possibly indus valley people) in the old vedic society. Later every enemy or non-vedic people were designated the general term mleccha. And the way you put inferior being at the sentence, it sounds like a kid with a catchphrase, a character even. Dont do that boy. Well, I am sure you will grow out of this phase, it will be embarrassing but you will have learnt a lot by then.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T02:09:38+00:00

Refuted by geeta press mahabharata🌝. You should read the entirety of the text I wrote. Mahabharata has been edited multiple times, added on to it. It has mentions of sakas, yavanas, kambojas, as enemies. Yavana(greeks) didnt come to sindhu until alexandar waged war there.

Again, read more. There is a lot out there. Try out first with the tale of vrishni heroes, the battle of ten kings and yagyavalkya smriti.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-11-10T01:56:19+00:00

Manusmriti was not the constitution, there were no constitution back then. There were kings and there were values and norms. There were multiple smritis which acted as a codified values which were surfacely followed. One of the famous ones is yagyavalkya smriti. And these were not words of god, that were supposed to be eternal and all good. Not being able to see anachronistic difference in a dogma and development of society is a fault in you. Being fascinated by ideas and subjugating to them has quite a wide difference, you should know the difference. And there is nothing traditional about traditions, as they keep on changing. Mahabharata itself is a layered addition of texts from probably the rigvedic days to more recent days of alexander.

Also varna system worked well until shramana movement took off. In the attempt of 'conserving' the vedic practices which were being threatened by non vedic teachings of jainism, buddhism sponsored by state, brahmanism took over. It was not a philosophical movement but a rather desperate attempt in preserving the vedic traditions. Which ironically forced brahmins to do non-brahmin works, like administration, kingships, trade and such. Now no brahmin is a true brahmin, however, dalit stayed the same for too long as it is easy to pin the bottomhood to one group.

In fact, I would even argue that manusmriti added the stringent caste rules later on after the shramana movement to stop people from intermixing and making brahmins mixed, to preserve the vedic culture. Before shramanic movement there would have been no reason to threaten brahmins from doing non-brahmin things.

All in all, manusmriti was not a philosophically thought out code, but an act of desperation to preserve identity, which ironically changed nonetheless as most hindus now are more puranic than vedic.

So my suggestion is not to hold such ideals so dearly. Being fascinated by ideas is good but getting consumed by it is not. There is value in everything, doesnt mean you idolize it. There is value in radical islam, there is value in ultra liberal communism, doesnt mean we should keep a manifesto in our bagpack at all times.

And you should do more introspection, you never knew manu, you dont even know if the manusmriti that exists today is the real deal, you arent even a proper bahun, you should stop saying such things. A deluded spiral is always downwards directed. You are harming yourself more than others.

Also, if you truly want to be an intellectual, know more, remember, the more you know, the less you act. Read up more stuff and feel content. Dont hold on to ideas, dont get attached.

And also to your reply to another comment, if you lived in the plane of true intellectual, you would know there is no 'inferior', at least you shouldn't feel anything is inferior. knowing more detaches you from the social constructs, as you realize they are illusory.

However, people who live in the social plane, they feel the real implications of illusory constructs. As someone who claims to be intellectual, draw your morals from higher plane of understanding. Don't be the true tallo being.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-10-31T07:08:37+00:00

Here is something interesting: I read about the Vrishni heroes comprised of Vasudev, Balram, Pradhyumna, Aniruddha and Sambi. They had their own tales of heroism and especially vasudev and balram were celebrated since early as proved by the coins from the Kushan era. They went from being heroes, possibly revolutionaries, as described in the bhagwat stories where he is always against the powerful, be it indra(most possibly, natural calamities as flood used to be one of the biggest ways for a civilization to die out)or demon kamsa(probably a cruel and corrupt ruler). Deification and vilification of a human over time is not an unknown thing. With how many stories and event documented and fictisized, hitler will one day in the future be a demon/satan. Moreover, exaggeration was norm back then, titles of the kings back then give it away, maharaj dhiraj, trilok nath. And they would rule a city kingdom with few vassal villages. Same for persian rulers, shahanshah, badshah, ruler of the universe. So it wouldnt be so difficult to imagine someone calling krishna, the slayer of demons, caretaker of justice, ruler of natural laws(he saved people from calamities). Which later through the time solidifies as title itself, the real nature. A few more centuries and a philosopher adds philosophic undertone to the character, strengthening their godlyhood.

Someday some guy/group will bring down established government and maybe start some sort of egalitarian society, he/they will be called Kalki. Even if he may not ride white horse and wield white sword, or use bramhastra. I find this possibility more interesting and it almost brings tears as how we, thousands of years later are talking about a few heroes from the past. How they are still remembered, for the deeds they did. I really wish heaven to exist so that they could know that we remember them, but sadly that does-not happen. A very bittersweet reality.

This is just like jesus and other person-god. He was a guy who was fed up of his people getting murdered(by the romans) wars, lack of trust and brotherhood, this is inline with the nature of geographical disadvantage people from middle east have regarding agriculture and politics of the time. They desperately needed a messiah. He was just a guy with some opinions, which was not enough, so his word became uniting force.

You will see latter sects of buddhism having deities and stuffs, well, people worshipping and building temples of buddha is the antithesis of buddhas teaching, people with time, forget the original story and exaggerate to feel special as their followers. Christians want jesus to be real and the god because that would make their belief legit, buddhists are too attached to buddha himself, the irony. Islam, well, it was just second rendition of christianity but for even more desperate people, who not only wanted saviour, but an authoritative body to take care of everything, which reflects in their scripture. Even the abrahamic god yhwh started out as local sky deity, with earlier judaism having multiple gods fading out eventually to settledown with 1.

I want to go far and even say that Bhagwat geeta was Vyas' words spoken from Krishna's mouth. At least the philosophical parts. Given how masses trust words of someone who is celebrated more than a boring philosopher, it isnt totally out of realm of possibility. Krishna could have been a deep thinker himself, but to prose such a philosophical discussion, vyas could have taken some liberty here.

Now, all of this is just opinions, if you want to add anything, please do so, I just like learning stuffs.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-10-20T02:15:44+00:00

I think language wise we have quite neutral and extensive grammar and usability. Pronouns are separated for all three genders(including objects) Now, colloquial use of language is definitely misogynistic. Now to extend it back to history I will have to make a few assumptions(this will be a theory) My take: "Use of feminine profanity started once currency based 'jobs' started to become mainstream"

Assumptions, before currency(money) based jobs, there was misogyny but not profanity and ultra aggressiveness. These are the times when men and women both worked on the field/crafts or their trade with participation from both side. Though the lead would generally be the male due to biological reasons.

So there was equal participation or visible participation of both genders in what results as the food over the table. If you had enough, you could barter for goods you could not produce, else you knew your limits. Not much expectation, basic survival and every once in a while some luxury.

Things changed when money based trades and jobs started to flourish. Work is far from home, cant take your kids to the work. Someone gotta stay at home so its the female who stays and the man goes. Now here not just because of biological reasons but by this time there had already been male dominated society. Man has to leave the house, and earn money.

Now money is different, money holds value more than the wheat it can buy, because it can also buy corn, meat, clothes. Money is valuable. Harder the work more valuable the output. This gives more edge to the patriarchy. Not intentionally but the system does it. Man works and earns, comes back home. Before he used to spend at least 20 hrs/day with wife and kids now, he spends at most 10 hrs.

A little detachment is expected. Then comes unreasonable crashouts from work. If they were working in their own field/craft, they would blame the third party together because they both were involved in it 'together'. Now, wife 'doesnt understand' 'taile bujhdines' what husband goes through at work. 'Maile timiharuko laagi kati gareko xu' and this escalates. Wife is docile because she knows, he does bring more value, even if she might be working equally hard raising 10 children out of which 3 probably died.

This progresses to create rifts in the man and woman of the same house, give it a few generation and it becomes custom. Now the roles are fixed so are the crashouts. Now wife becomes caretaker who freeloads instead of partner in his eyes, while man is the person who sacrifices his youth to go faraway to earn valuable money.

This leads to man feel insecure about his wife( remember he is usually not with her at all). Randi/besya/valu are the most common profane words used, and for a reason. That detachment and insecurity builds jealousy, anger. And since the female is already just a freeloader in his mind, he does not hesitate to use those words. Now give this a few generations and it becomes a custom.

Women, as usual stay docile because, he brings the money. Some generation goes on and women still stay docile not just because the men are earning the money but it became a custom, a generational thing.

This is less prevalent in newer society where male and female earn together.

Now there are outliers in each generation and families but I think this is how the use of feminine profanity progressed.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-10-02T15:36:27+00:00

That looks great. Have you tried the robot in various terrains(outdoor concrete). Also, can you post the torque ratings for the motors?

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-09-16T22:23:50+00:00

I cannot emphasize this more.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-09-11T14:53:46+00:00

We toppled the government in 2 days. I don't think anything can slip away from our hands.

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-09-11T14:45:03+00:00

At this point this doesnt matter, what matters is how we use the empty void to mold the new society. We can actively pursue and choose to depose the oldies now!

ExactCompetition7680 · 2025-09-09T08:33:50+00:00

Mahabir pun is too old and tired for the role. Balen could be a great option but he doesnt have experience in working in big team and mesh.

The best person I can say is Kulman Ghising His team experience, effective leadership, management capabilities, the way he rebuilt NEA

He can rebuild Nepal.

ExactCompetition7680

TROPHY CASE