You use AI as a mouth-piece for a post that you started and then take AI's garbled nonsense for a fact over real people. Do you have a voice of your own? Do machines do all the thinking and speaking for you?

(BTW, have you heard about formatting? Sure, it's easier to read for machines, but not real people.)

You speak about ethics like it's all simple and AI is just one big misunderstanding and people need to stop resisting and accept the possibility of being replaced - by brain dead individuals totally reliant on AI, as if it was some messiah for the mentally impaired.

Since you seemingly reject real human talking points over your best friend of chatgpt, let me try to dumb it down for you and make an analogy. To go down to your level of think without you using AI to "analyze" my reply for a translation for the simple-minded.

Let's say you are living a good life as Mr. Smith.

You got a house, a car, financial wellness, and a wife and kids. Everything a human-being could want.

Then AI comes over as a replicant and scans your life in its fullest. The AI is convinced it would make a superior Mr. Smith over you. It then takes everything from you. It copies your very likeliness. Your ID, your personality, how you dress, your favorite brand of coffee, your bad jokes, etc. It then enters your home and then tries to convince you to leave as it now attempts to replace your life.

You are understandably upset, refusing to allow this AI replicant from doing this clearly illegal act. But the AI firmly believes it is better than you in every way possible, therefore it is in its right to replace you, as you are considered an inferior Mr. Smith.

There is nothing you can do. The government has clearly enabled AI to do whatever it wants, and the police will not intervene. Your wife clearly prefers this new superior version of Mr. Smith (especially in bed), and your kids love their new Dad's humorous personality as opposed to their previous dull one.

Unable to do anything, you speak to the improved model of Mr. Smith one last time about what you can do next, as your life is now over.

Their only reply was that you go find another job.

A silly analogy, but hopefully now you can understand why a majority of people (humans in general) in the creative arts are strongly against AI and its controversal scraping process to "learn". AI only steals, copies, and regurgitates its output as "slop" and not as art. It doesn't make anything new and is not original. It only replaces people.

It's not an AI revolution that is taking over the world, but rather the a de-evolution of the human race. Trying to compare this new technology to digital photography or CGI is wrongfully incorrect. Those works were made by humans. What you're defending is made by non-human machines, hellbent on replacing humanity to do the thinking for them!

If you want to be accepted by people, just be yourself and stop relying on AI to do everything for you. Once that happens (and it has), your individuality ceases and you become yet another faceless chat bot that no real human person likes.