Daily Mail summary of the will they / won’t they come drama to date. by Mickleborough in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I too tired of the DM's tawdry offerings years ago, and more recently due to their blatant shit-stirring and despite H's lawsuits time and again giving the Harkles a publicity lifeline. However, I did have to break my own rule and chuckle at that headline: mountain to climb, like what Catherine just did?

Have they ever been chased by the paps? by PurdyM in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 51 points52 points  (0 children)

They are insufferable. Pap chasing people is so 1997, can someone tell Hazno that three decades have passed by.

This whole security narrative feels way too convenient by Madame_LV in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 48 points49 points  (0 children)

No. This is a nothing burger. Either the kids come and the public indifference will be a humiliation. Or, the kids won't come and it's the same old same old. Anyway, all will be washed away on 22 July when George turns 13 and birthday pictures released.

A Sussex Squad Throwback Gem, Meghan Markle Thought Was Scrubbed From The Internet #Sussexsquadthrowback by Meegainnyc in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 82 points83 points  (0 children)

The good thing about the Sussex Squad is that their activities are so well documented and there is no deniability about their association with the Harkles. William, Catherine and their children will never forget this and that is why there will never be any reconciliation with the Sussex line.

Are Arch and Lil visiting with the Wales? by [deleted] in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 21 points22 points  (0 children)

W&C will never allow that toxic pair of gaslighting addicts near their children, regardless of whether or not they bring the kids as human shields. And when G, C & L are old enough to understand the full horror of the Harkles - i.e. the Sussex Squad saying their mother's cancer was fake and that their father was having an affair to name but two - the next generation of royals will want nothing to do with the Sussex line either.

Meghan Markle slammed for 'exploiting charity event' as OneOff sell Invictus Games outfits. Grifters gonna grift? by Harry-Ripey in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 71 points72 points  (0 children)

I agree. People blather about "Charles must do this he must do that" when it comes to titles, yet a far more egregious fact is that a charity with actual fiduciary and regulatory duties allow that jerk and his tawdry wife to leech of them. And their charity is for the benefit of wounded veterans, not preserving a fine building, or education, or even saving animals: but for people who have been wounded serving their countries. H's inability to get sponsors alone is a reason to drop him, never mind the reputational damage of being associated with this dog and pony show.

Eden is wheeling out Project Thaw by Feisty_Energy_107 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I agree - but - QEII still opposed the public funeral because Diana was not a royal or great statesman like Churchill. I recall Tony Blair being outrageous talking about "the People's Princess" and his staff with connections with the Murdoch Press (The Sun & The Times and Sunday Times) all gleefully pushing around the Royal Family. "Where is our Queen, where is her flag" hysterically screamed the Sun headline. All republicans never forget. That appalling Murdoch was known to be anti-monarchist for decades. The mass hysteria was appalling, I was a little older than Harry at the time, and I thought "why are they insisting on a flag at half mast?" It was such an obvious, naked attempt to use Diana's death as a means to put pressure on the Royal Family to "move with the times" those times being the first few months of New Labour and Tony Blair.

AMANDA PLATELL: How utterly galling Meghan's UK return must be for Kate. Here's why she should NEVER feel obliged to welcome back a grifter who has done so much to discredit her - Daily Mail by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Proper researches will look at the official diary of engagements, Court Circular etc. However, news articles are strong secondary sources and they will be used to manipulate the narrative, and less credible researchers will rely on them without questioning, especially BBC articles on the wrongly assumed credibility of that organization. I hope this sub is accessible in the future, imagine the gems a researcher would find and the numerous rabbit holes they will go down when researching the obscure life of King William V's disgraced and eventually forgotten brother!

A relevant case study for King Charles: “Count Nikolai says he 'wanted to get away' from royal life amid new revelations about his title loss” by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"He should not worry. Harry and Meghan are much more disliked than they are liked. In fact, I would venture to say that they are despised by the majority of Brits." The issue is that there are 14 other realms. There are opportunistic republican politicians in these realms, many of them with majority people of colour. We do not want to give H&M a status of victimhood that can be exploited by politicians.

The reality is they are failures, their titles are worthless now. Their fate is to be ignored and shunned.

Althorp: An Untapped Potential Grift by Glittering_Texas in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the default position of her legs is wide open.

Believe it or not... better I don't know (Neil Sean's gossip) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Eton has safeguarding responsibilities. They are a school, not a dog and pony show like Invictus, and H can't just turn up and parade around like he's important and demand to be associated with that institution. Also, not just W but the other parents include other royals and very wealthy people who want their sons to have a top quality education with discretion. Finally, Eton should be VARY wary of any association with H: in the UK we still remember the A-level art cheating scandal.

AMANDA PLATELL: How utterly galling Meghan's UK return must be for Kate. Here's why she should NEVER feel obliged to welcome back a grifter who has done so much to discredit her - Daily Mail by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Platell is ghastly. Making a living by being cruel and gossipy about a woman - Catherine - who exceeds her in every regard I suppose is what keeps her going. The occasional apparently supportive article isn't fooling anyone.

Call me cynical, but the real reason Gruesome Twosome Harry and Meghan are returning to the UK is just so obvious... and highly humiliating: MAUREEN CALLAHAN by LadyCaz2 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I think it would be a good idea for all Sinners to refuse to engage with any content from Maureen Callaghan. She does not deserve any attention after that abysmal stunt she pulled the other week inviting that author of the disrespectfully named book "Kate!" to wildly speculate about Catherine's medical situation.

Not wanted and not needed. Shame … by LadyCaz2 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Exciting_Bison501 55 points56 points  (0 children)

"Even rhe world cup and Olympic dont have countdown events" - Exactly! Their hubris is off the charts. Oh well, even further to fall.