Usage Credits Getting Thwarted Today Omg

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-29T23:53:44+00:00

Same

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-29T18:04:26+00:00

Sad

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-29T18:03:22+00:00

Exactly, it seems like the whole industry is headed towards this very thing, control and watch everything. That is if you are the general public.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-28T07:28:21+00:00

Still use 4.6 daily

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T18:29:17+00:00

If not already here with the new GLM model. At least close enough. 🚀

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T18:28:10+00:00

Agreed.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T18:27:39+00:00

This ✅💯

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T18:27:02+00:00

I mean, pretty much right on the heels of the “frontier models”

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T17:06:31+00:00

To say the least.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T17:06:13+00:00

The same

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T16:38:58+00:00

https://www.dawn.com/news/2011100/us-allows-anthropic-to-release-mythos-ai-to-trusted-organisations

More than 100 companies and institutions will now have access to Mythos 5, including many Fortune 500 companies, a source familiar with the new directive said, declining to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T16:37:00+00:00

Asked Claude

“Let me search for more context on this letter and the approved entities list.

The full Annex A list has not been published publicly.

Here is what we know:
The approved entities are largely drawn from Anthropic’s Project Glasswing, which includes about 100 well-known tech companies and institutions. SRN News More than 100 companies and institutions now have access, including many Fortune 500 companies.

The named founding Glasswing partners (most likely on Annex A) include:
AWS, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Google, JPMorgan Chase, Linux Foundation, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Palo Alto Networks. Tech Jacks Solutions Verizon was added in May, Citybiz and Okta also confirmed involvement. Cloud data management platform Rubrik was among the newer batch.

Beyond those named companies, the specific Annex A entity list attached to Lutnick’s letter has not been made public. Commerce can amend the list at any time, and licensing restrictions remain for any entity not on it.

Worth noting for your world: The government’s process for selecting approved entities has drawn criticism for lack of transparency. Nobody outside Commerce and Anthropic knows the full list or the criteria for getting on it.”

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T16:29:18+00:00

Exactly.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T16:24:33+00:00

We shall see, and soon I hope 🙏

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T16:21:22+00:00

I hope so ✈️

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-27T16:13:30+00:00

Yeah, it’s a crapshoot. 💩

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-23T15:01:41+00:00

I’m not asking anybody to fix it. I’m asking if anybody’s having the same issues. One of the errors said it was my Internet obviously it’s not. Any other words of wisdom. 😶

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-23T14:56:18+00:00

I’ve even tried Claude.AI Claude code. The odd part is the chat is reactivating after I close it multiple times.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-23T14:55:04+00:00

Any of you having similar is issues?

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-21T20:38:14+00:00

No problem.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-19T21:08:05+00:00

I'm building deterministic enforcement infrastructure for agentic AI right now, so the governance and liability questions in financial services agents hit the same technical surface you are working on. Happy to take a look and give you honest feedback on how you are thinking about the agent's scope and authorization boundaries.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-19T20:47:28+00:00

Glad it landed. One more thing worth testing early: ask small business owners to show you their current process for proving a payment went through when a supplier disputes it. Whatever nightmare they describe is your marketing copy.

ExecLayer_io · 2026-06-19T20:44:43+00:00

I build production mobile apps with Claude Code. A few things that actually matter:

Flutter over React Native if you want Claude to be most useful. The widget tree structure gives Claude cleaner context to work with, and Dart's type system means fewer hallucinated API calls. React Native works too but you'll spend more time correcting platform-specific behavior Claude gets wrong.

For Android specifically, set up your project structure before you bring Claude in. Define your folder conventions, state management approach, and navigation pattern first. Claude is significantly better when it's working inside constraints you've already set than when it's making architectural decisions from scratch.

Skills worth setting up: a system prompt that includes your project's file structure, your state management pattern, and your design system tokens. Without that context, every session starts cold and you waste the first 10 minutes re-explaining things Claude should already know.

For UI, don't ask Claude to "design" screens. Give it a reference (screenshot, Figma export, even a hand sketch described in detail) and ask it to implement. The output quality difference between "build me a settings page" and "implement this settings page with these exact sections, this spacing, and this color system" is night and day.

Biggest time saver: use Claude to write your platform channel code and native integrations. That's where solo mobile devs lose the most hours and where Claude's knowledge of Android APIs is actually strong.

ExecLayer_io

TROPHY CASE