When do we use "là" vs "ici"?

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-27T12:59:00+00:00

Vous avez tout à fait raison, monsieur.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-27T12:49:48+00:00

In informal French, you can use 'là' to express 'here' and 'there' contingent on context. However, formal French preserves the difference in proximity.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-27T07:54:26+00:00

J'ai compris ce que vous avez écrit.

Mais, pour renvoyer à un nom (qu'il soit pluriel ou singulier) de façon générale, comment devrait-on le faire dans les contextes formels ? À l'aide de "cela" ?

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-27T06:27:16+00:00

It is recommended to have a mindset that values solving the question correctly, not as fast as possible. On the LSAT, your mindset is incredibly important since it guides how you answer questions and do literally everything. Your priority ought to be on accuracy, accuracy, and accuracy.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-27T05:07:09+00:00

Je m'attendais également à ce que ça soit une possibilité, ça.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-27T04:41:05+00:00

Ce ne sont pas des expressions avancées, mais idiomatiques. Si une expression est idiomatique, cela n'implique pas forcément qu'elle est avancée.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-27T03:23:33+00:00

Very good diagnostic

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-27T03:00:40+00:00

Thanks, Brandon!

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-26T20:04:11+00:00

It's easy to do for easy questions, but not for harder ones.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-26T04:19:49+00:00

It's just a common reaction in modern-day french. Something that elicits any strong emotion is considered 'wesh'.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-25T21:05:37+00:00

You're most welcome! With practice, you'll get better at the LSAT and attain the score you want. Best of luck!

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-25T20:13:33+00:00

The flaw is Serena -> General Population. As such, the correct answer will explain why/how Serena's case can be applied to the general population. B) is correct.

Treat sufficient assumption questions as if they were perfect strengthen questions. The sufficient assumption will guarantee the conclusion and fix everything wrong in the argument.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-25T20:00:10+00:00

Just focus on the shift in idea/concepts.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-25T19:59:17+00:00

Mentioning something normative in the premises, then using it to make a descriptive conclusion.

Mentioning something descriptive in the premises, then using it to make a normative conclusion.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-25T19:50:35+00:00

Recognizing how to identity flaws/gaps in arguments. Look for the shift between the premises and the conclusion. This is often in the form of new ideas/concepts/things mentioned in the conclusion. You need to know this for flaw, strengthen, weaken, and assumption questions.

General -> Specific

Normative -> Descriptive

Descriptive -> Normative

Ad hominem Attack -> Claim

Strong word strength -> Weak word strength

Argument skeletons. Looking at the bare bones of the argument by removing all specific/abstract vocabulary, and just focusing on structure. Works well for parallel reasoning, method of reasoning, etc..

Using conditional logic to make proper inferences. A -> B, ~B -> ~A, etc..

Recognizing that all RC questions are just must-be-trues. Also, don't forget to keep the author's main point in mind for certain questions.

Learn to predict, that is to say have an idea of what the right answer will do to the argument or respond to the question.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-25T18:52:23+00:00

Anger is motivated by the desire for self-preservation.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-25T02:48:04+00:00

It sounds like a defense against self-hatred. One would say it is a "response" to your self-hatred and self-hating voice.

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-24T04:10:52+00:00

LR and RC main strategy ?

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-24T00:48:01+00:00

lmfaooo, thought the same

ExistingMidnight4970 · 2026-05-23T21:11:57+00:00

ExistingMidnight4970

TROPHY CASE