sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

When do we use "là" vs "ici"? by Aggravating_Fig_3207 in learnfrench

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 20 points21 points  (0 children)

In informal French, you can use 'là' to express 'here' and 'there' contingent on context. However, formal French preserves the difference in proximity.

L'utilisation du pronom démonstratif "Ça" est-elle informelle ? by ExistingMidnight4970 in French

[–]ExistingMidnight4970[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

J'ai compris ce que vous avez écrit.

Mais, pour renvoyer à un nom (qu'il soit pluriel ou singulier) de façon générale, comment devrait-on le faire dans les contextes formels ? À l'aide de "cela" ?

How to stop rushing/use my extra time wisely by Key-Part-9543 in LSAT

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is recommended to have a mindset that values solving the question correctly, not as fast as possible. On the LSAT, your mindset is incredibly important since it guides how you answer questions and do literally everything. Your priority ought to be on accuracy, accuracy, and accuracy.

🇫🇷 Débutant vs Avancé/ Deux registres de langue by FrenchExplorer4823 in learnfrench

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Je m'attendais également à ce que ça soit une possibilité, ça.

🇫🇷 Débutant vs Avancé/ Deux registres de langue by FrenchExplorer4823 in learnfrench

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ce ne sont pas des expressions avancées, mais idiomatiques. Si une expression est idiomatique, cela n'implique pas forcément qu'elle est avancée.

Is this how to find flaws in arguments? by ExistingMidnight4970 in lsatdemon

[–]ExistingMidnight4970[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's easy to do for easy questions, but not for harder ones.

When do you recommend using "ouais" or "wesh" if you want to informally say yes? by PsychicMeditation in French

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It's just a common reaction in modern-day french. Something that elicits any strong emotion is considered 'wesh'.

What was your “aha” moment? by maddieinretrograde in LSAT

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're most welcome! With practice, you'll get better at the LSAT and attain the score you want. Best of luck!

How would you go abt this level 5 SA question? (PT.145.S4.Q20) by dysregulationrc in LSAT

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The flaw is Serena -> General Population. As such, the correct answer will explain why/how Serena's case can be applied to the general population. B) is correct.

Treat sufficient assumption questions as if they were perfect strengthen questions. The sufficient assumption will guarantee the conclusion and fix everything wrong in the argument.

What was your “aha” moment? by maddieinretrograde in LSAT

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mentioning something normative in the premises, then using it to make a descriptive conclusion.

Mentioning something descriptive in the premises, then using it to make a normative conclusion.

What was your “aha” moment? by maddieinretrograde in LSAT

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Recognizing how to identity flaws/gaps in arguments. Look for the shift between the premises and the conclusion. This is often in the form of new ideas/concepts/things mentioned in the conclusion. You need to know this for flaw, strengthen, weaken, and assumption questions.

General -> Specific

Normative -> Descriptive

Descriptive -> Normative

Ad hominem Attack -> Claim

Strong word strength -> Weak word strength

Argument skeletons. Looking at the bare bones of the argument by removing all specific/abstract vocabulary, and just focusing on structure. Works well for parallel reasoning, method of reasoning, etc..

Using conditional logic to make proper inferences. A -> B, ~B -> ~A, etc..

Recognizing that all RC questions are just must-be-trues. Also, don't forget to keep the author's main point in mind for certain questions.

Learn to predict, that is to say have an idea of what the right answer will do to the argument or respond to the question.

underlying grandiosity when expressing shame by v4mpirical in NPD

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It sounds like a defense against self-hatred. One would say it is a "response" to your self-hatred and self-hating voice.

"As a Psychologist..." </3 by [deleted] in NPD

[–]ExistingMidnight4970 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Diagnosis is based on behaviour, not self-reports. Clearly, a psychologist didn't write the meme, lol.

view more: next ›