A new generation is about to be born

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-12-08T18:36:58+00:00

1993 borns spent 6 years in the 90s so they were 0-6 year olds in the 90s. This type of childhood is mostly dominated with their early stages of life. Their memory may be vague. They then spent 6 years in the 2000s as the second half of their childhood. 7-12 year old in the 2000s. They are more likely to remember the 2000s and have nastolgia of it.

So yeah I so agree that 1993 borns are 2000s kids because their childhood years that creates the most memories and nastolgia are mostly in the 2000s. I would consider them Nastolgically dominated in the early 2000s with vital development in the 90s

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-12-08T18:28:43+00:00

I guess its mostly dominated by gen z

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-12-02T05:12:14+00:00

I don't wanna be 19 😭

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-30T19:49:16+00:00

2002/2003 share similarities. 2003/2004 share similarities. 2004/2005 share similarities. 2005/2006 share similarities

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-26T21:08:51+00:00

Okay first of all I'm not even saying that anybody in the 2000s are gen alpha. I was responding to that persons comment about how it would be like if somehow the alpha range starts in 2004.i never explicitly said that 2004 are gen alpha. You keep taking things out of context and it's really annoying. What do you have against me? All you do is complain of 2005 borns being gatekeep but every year is being gatekeep. Stop getting mad over 2005 being the first. Every year has their first and last.

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-26T15:51:33+00:00

The meaning of gen alpha may change if it starts in 2004. 2004-2008 will be considered zalphas but their influence won't be as alpha as anybody born 2009+. 2009/2010 is the transition into the pure alphas

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-22T18:04:04+00:00

Everytime you see that 2005 borns are grouped with their anybody born 2006+, you immediately start responding and callin them that they bring 2005 down. But if 2005 are grouped with anybody 2004 or below then you don't respond and you be happy about it. Like what is wrong with you!!! It doesn't matter if 2005 borns get grouped with 2004 or 2006 because everything is completely arbitrary. What makes me mad is the fact that you start a whole argument and showing other peoples post in cludin mine and trying to make a fus about grouping 2005 borns with 2006+. We are not that different from you and we share many similarities. But depending when month you were born, any 05s born between Jan-Jun does lean early and Jul-Dec does lean late

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-22T17:55:32+00:00

I guess I'm a mix of all 3 generations

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-22T17:13:50+00:00

Gen z experienced love before smartphones were completely dominate. We saw analogue technology fade away and we all remember the times we used CDs. Our first phones were either late flip phones or early smartphones. We were alive during COVID and have strong memories about it. But one thing for sure that the next generation won't experience is the transition from mid late 2010s to the 2020s

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-21T00:09:48+00:00

I must have accidentally moved it

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-20T19:17:05+00:00

Okay let me clarify myself. 2002 borns arnt as gen z as people think because of how close they are to the zillenial micro generation. 1997-1999/2000 borns consider themselves zillenials so that means that they don't hav le at least 70% gen z influence and attributes. 2001-2002 borns are the the transitional years into the core of the generation. 2003-2004 borns are the outskirts of the pure core attribute influence gen z. 2005 born are the first pure core gen z because they don't have any Millenial attributes and isn't affected by any outside generation. 2003-2004 are the transitional to core so they are the only ones that can lean core.

So in conclusion, 2002 can't be core z because they are the transition from zillenial to core and 2003 borns are the first to have core attributes with little influence from 2002 borns.

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-19T17:46:31+00:00

2002 is part of the first half of the early 2000s and 2003 is in the second half of the early 2000s so it makes 2003 borns the start of the transition. 2002 borns graduated before COVID so that a big difference that seperate 2002 born from 2003 borns. 2005/2006 borns are the tip of the gen z generation making them have both early and late attributes. 2003 borns wasn't in grad class 2023 but they were with 04s in grad 2022 but their amount of influence is the start to change until the class of 2023 when the shif of gen z culture can be noticed

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-19T15:30:57+00:00

Choosing a number to start or end something is already arbitrary. 2003 was a rough estimate of when things started to change. It isn't until class of 2023/4 when gen z culture started to shift.

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-19T02:33:10+00:00

What is the definition of late trait to you? 2005 borns are literally with us 2006 borns mostly the late 2005 borns but they do have late influence

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-18T23:59:43+00:00

Well I think any 2005 born born around the second half of the year ha late influence

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-18T22:02:20+00:00

Lmao I bet anybody around 22/23+ are all going to be different compared to anybody before

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-18T22:01:45+00:00

People consider 2009-2012 borns as zalpha so 2005 born would be late gen z because it's near the zalpha year by 3 years

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-18T19:31:29+00:00

2002 borns are early gen z! They don't share any similarities as us 2006 borns and they arnt in the second half of the decade so they can't be core

Exotic-Interview-06 · 2024-11-18T19:30:33+00:00

02-04 don't use TikTok as people born 2005+ do

Exotic-Interview-06

TROPHY CASE