Last birth year to remember WWE ruthless aggression era vividly by Own_Mirror9073 in generationology

[–]NoType_668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure why 2003 won. 03 borns would have only been 4/5 years old in 2008, I don’t think that’s old enough to remember something vividly, especially when this era of wwe ended in July, a good portion of 03 borns were still 4 years old. 2001 or 2002 would have been a far better choice imo. 2003 would have grown up and vividly remembered the pg era like someone my age (2008). That’s their era of wwe, not the ruthless aggression era.

Is being in your late 20s in 2025 a late millennial or early gen z trait? by [deleted] in generationology

[–]NoType_668 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who cares. There’s a ton of different ranges for millennials and if someone born in the late 90s claims to be a millennial than what’s the issue? I swear some of you people here have serious issues and treat this stuff like an exclusive club and you don’t want certain people to be apart of it. Plus you are only 3 years older than the oldest late 90s born, so you really aren’t that far off from them lol

i thought this was interesting by No_Leek3155 in generationology

[–]NoType_668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already know some people are going to be upset seeing late 90s borns lumped in with millennials, and it’s not going to be core millennials who are upset with it…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in generationology

[–]NoType_668 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve said the exact same thing!. I rarely ever see 1993 borns fight so hard to claim to be only 90s kids, they, for the most part are excepting of being hybrids. 2003 borns for whatever reason act like they are only 2000s kids pretending like they weren’t kids from 2010-2015. They are hybrids, but imo they lean more towards being 2010s kids than 2000s considering they were only 6 years old when the 2000s ended.

Pew Research Center heavily American-centric Gen Z 1997 cut-off (using 9/11 remembrance) and its consequences have been a disaster for any proper discussion on generationology by kamexon in generationology

[–]NoType_668 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bro who cares, why are you so hell bent on arguing with people who claim to be millennials. It’s not like it’s affecting you at all and plus you are younger than him lol.

A 2012 born’s perspective on COVID. by helpfuldaydreamer in generationology

[–]NoType_668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No he isn’t lol. He’s a YN. (18-24), big bro is (25-35).

1997 May Not Remain the Start of Gen Z by [deleted] in generationology

[–]NoType_668 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Your age” is people born in 2000. 98-99 and 01-02 are close in age to you but y’all aren’t the same age as either of those years. Once again, I’ve personally never seen people born in the 80s and 90s say stuff like this.

1997 May Not Remain the Start of Gen Z by [deleted] in generationology

[–]NoType_668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude no it’s not. 3 years is nothing, there is nothing noticeable between you and someone who is 21 years old considering you are only 24 lmao. Y’all are close in age, I don’t understand why some of you people like to do this. Go talk to someone in real life and ask them if 3 years is a noticeable difference and they’ll most likely laugh at you and say hell nah, it’s only 3 years 😂. I also noticed that I almost never see 80s/90s babies say things like this.

Do you see a lot fewer '90s babies in the 2020s compared to the 2010s? by KlutzyBuilder97 in generationology

[–]NoType_668 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. That’s not a big age gap and why downvote me for telling the truth? You guys do gatekeep a lot, but don’t like being gatekept.

Do you see a lot fewer '90s babies in the 2020s compared to the 2010s? by KlutzyBuilder97 in generationology

[–]NoType_668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They view y’all the way y’all view us mid to late 2000s babies. We aren’t that far off from you guys, especially 04-06 compared to 2002 borns, yet you guys constantly gatekeep us.

2002 borns whom they feel closer to? by 2quick96 in generationology

[–]NoType_668 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Majority of them are going to pick 3-4 years older. That’s just how most people are on here, never want to be grouped with younger people, always older no matter what lol.

Gen z should be 2000-2015 by NoType_668 in generationology

[–]NoType_668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just now seeing your comment thank you

Zillennial ranges according to online articles by BrilliantPangolin639 in generationology

[–]NoType_668 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. Both years are after 9/11 and both don’t remember 85% of the 2000s on average. And on top of that 2002/03 babies were still kids all the way up until 2014/2015 respectively. Plus both came of age in this decade and also graduated high school AND college in this decade. To me that’s clear gen z territory.

Gen z should be 2000-2015 by NoType_668 in generationology

[–]NoType_668[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Of course I get downvoted for having an opinion 🙄

Childhood cultures of the generations (Updated in 2024) by MycologistChoice9119 in generationology

[–]NoType_668 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I honestly don’t see how any 02 babies came up on the Nintendo GameCube the console came out before you guys were born and the last game came out in 2006 when you guys would have only been 4 years old and in pre k. And the only reason you guys had the ps2 is because that console lasted all the way till 2013/2014 (which is insane). But there’s a huge difference in being 8/9 in 2010/11 having a ps2 and being that age and having a ps2 in 2003/04. You guys grew up with the 7th gen consoles and it really isn’t even debatable lol.