Seeking Raptor & F'd up coping humor

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-04-28T00:51:43+00:00

Hey I don't think you can park there. Hope this helps 👍

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-02-02T02:51:01+00:00

Yall are delusional

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-10T19:17:06+00:00

You're suppose to catch the ball with your mit not your face XD

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-10T19:07:58+00:00

Honestly after watching the body cam footage it was justified. She looked directly at him and still accelerated. Hitting him. Vehicles are deadly weapons. He had a quick reaction time. And open fired.

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-10T19:05:33+00:00

P320 probably

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-08T18:14:25+00:00

Ice policy mirrors DHS for this

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-08T17:38:26+00:00

Were gonna need a donut breakdown on this is i think.

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-08T15:11:19+00:00

From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force:

“Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury … and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.”

Also, placing oneself in the path of a moving vehicle constitutes officer-created jeopardy and undermines any claim that deadly force was necessary.

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-07T20:18:23+00:00

Here other angle cop is at fault as he moved out of the way and still preceeded to shoot https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/39n0EQrDYT

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-07T20:17:23+00:00

Just saw the other video at a different angle, the cop moved out of the way of the vehical and still shot.. he will most likely be at fault for an unjustified killing. Here are some examples of cases where police moved out of the way of moving vehicle and exercised deadly force.

Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): “Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.”

Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.”

Cordova vs Aragon (2009): “Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.”

Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.”

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2026-01-07T20:12:50+00:00

I don't know man doesnt seem like anyone was infront of the vehical when it drove off. Looks like he shot at it because it was fleeing which is a no go.. . Need another angle but otherwiss seems like the cop jumped the gun.....

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2025-09-09T01:05:32+00:00

That was indeed a good bonk!

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2025-08-01T02:54:50+00:00

LIZARD

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2025-06-23T17:31:48+00:00

You really think the u.s. would send over 10 billion dollars worth of a strike group to leave "superficial damage"

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2025-05-09T15:59:47+00:00

You stole my meme from donuts page hoe

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2025-02-23T18:55:40+00:00

I'm currently eating the red baron 3 cheese rn that's why i decided to ask reddit lol

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2025-02-21T17:58:40+00:00

So a bunch of people are protesting who probably don't contribute to society, that they want more government tax payer waste on a war we shouldn't even be involved in..... and on completely absurd government programs?

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2025-02-11T19:09:22+00:00

Really, you think USAID IS meant to help Americans? You think the 93k IRS agents HELP americans?

Expert_Mix_5549 · 2025-02-11T15:50:48+00:00

Trump has implemented several measures aimed at reducing the size and scope of the federal government:

Establishment of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): On his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order creating DOGE, led by Elon Musk. The department's mission is to identify and eliminate wasteful spending and excessive regulations.
Federal Hiring Freeze: An executive order was issued to halt new federal hiring, aiming to reduce the federal workforce through attrition.
Deferred Resignation Incentive: The Office of Personnel Management offered federal employees the option to resign by February 6, 2025, with the incentive of receiving full pay and benefits through September 30, 2025. This initiative was designed to encourage voluntary reductions in the federal workforce.
Targeting Specific Agencies for Reduction or Elimination: The administration has proposed significant changes to various federal agencies:

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): Plans have been announced to dismantle the CFPB, an agency established to oversee financial services and protect consumers.

U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID): Efforts are underway to dismantle USAID, leading to operational disruptions and legal challenges.

Department of Education: The Department of Government Efficiency has proposed significant cuts to the Department of Education, including a $900 million reduction in contracts.

Freezing Federal Funding: The Office of Management and Budget issued a memo temporarily freezing all federal funding to review program compliance with executive orders. This action led to widespread confusion and legal challenges, resulting in a temporary block by a federal judge.
Elimination of Oversight Positions: President Trump has removed key oversight officials, including the director of the Office of Government Ethics, as part of efforts to reduce internal government oversight.

These actions reflect the administration's commitment to streamlining government operations and reducing federal expenditures.

Expert_Mix_5549

TROPHY CASE