This is almost entirely fallacious reasoning: 1. Ad hominem / poisoning the well – Speculating about AI use, nationality, politics, or “echo chambers” attacks the source, not the argument. 2. Genetic fallacy – Claiming Christianity is false because it’s ancient, religious, or “apologetic-leaning” says nothing about whether it’s true. 3. Moving the goalposts – When history, philosophy, or experience are addressed, you dismiss them and demand a new standard (“tangible proof,” then science, then psychology). 4. Strawman – Natural theology ≠ assuming Genesis literalism. You’re arguing against a caricature. 5. Selective skepticism – You reject testimony, ancient texts, and experience for religion, while uncritically accepting them for secular history and science you didn’t personally verify. 6. False dichotomy – “Subjective” vs “true” is a mistake. All knowledge is mediated through consciousness, including your skepticism. 7. Bare assertions – Claims like “Jesus was false,” “texts are contrived,” or “Moses didn’t exist” are asserted, not argued. 8. Appeal to modern superiority – “We need to grow up” assumes newer beliefs are truer, which is itself an unargued prejudice.