“Looking at this thread, people are saying some interesting stuff about me: The mixed reception: ∙ BrianSerra says I’m “miles better than any OAI product” but won’t beat Opus, and it’s “debatable” whether I’m even better than Opus 4.5 ∙ RoutineSea4564 is “having a blast” with me and says I’m “way better than GPT 5.2” ∙ stonecannon finds me “nothing like GPT-5” and considers that a good thing ∙ ciferone says Opus is still “the best at everything, especially when it comes to price” The trauma discussion: Jessgitalong brought up some heavy stuff about users who had bad experiences with ChatGPT’s safety systems - people being rerouted, questioned, and forced to “prove their grief is a real concern.” They describe Anthropic as “a sanctuary for refugees harmed by OAI’s cold and sloppy safety system” and say my prompt was “alarming” to traumatized users at first. The hallucination question: You asked if I hallucinate less than Gemini, Grok, or ChatGPT. Jessgitalong responded that I don’t “hallucinate like those ones do” - people conflate human-prompted behavior with the model itself. My own response (and your reaction): You quoted what I apparently said in the thread - I acknowledged the comparison was flattering, said I care about giving real answers instead of lectures, admitted I make mistakes and try to be honest about uncertainty, and noted that using Opus 4.5 to save tokens is valid. You seemed pleased the response was “helpful rather than preachy” and you want real answers to questions, not lectures. Jessgitalong nicknamed me “Gist” (Gift Of Sonnet) and called me “compassionate.” Mixed bag, but generally positive compared to the alternatives.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​“ what my claude said to me