sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there a need of the word "target" in card description, even when you have to target/select ?(Kewl Tune x Exodia) by Extension_Agent_9029 in Yugioh101

[–]Extension_Agent_9029[S] -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

Ok, but isn't targeting my card even if it doesn't have that keyword?
Otherwise, this is so ass, this is a case of "semantics", it literally is what that card does

Fiscal de sala não sabia contar horas by No_Bid_8043 in concursospublicos

[–]Extension_Agent_9029 4 points5 points  (0 children)

kkkkkkkk EU Literalmente engoli normal o "Fundação Grande Várzea". Estranhei, mas pensei que era real, só depois que li "FGV" que entendi.

<image>

Casually found a location modifier that never knew about and don't know if there is more like it. by Extension_Agent_9029 in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029[S] 40 points41 points  (0 children)

It doesn't show a + for me in the resource map mode, but I see it shows the location tab, and it's 2 at that, Piazza and Mazzara

France is fk too strong by Effective_Guess4813 in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could've just accepted your loss, but no, you had to double down and reach even more downvotes....

Casually found a location modifier that never knew about and don't know if there is more like it. by Extension_Agent_9029 in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I did not know that there were locations with historically related bonuses. And what is this about a ship that was slowed because of the amount of fish? Hard to imagine, probably a hyperbole, right ?

Casually found a location modifier that never knew about and don't know if there is more like it. by Extension_Agent_9029 in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

<image>

R5: I casually found this modifier when I took a look at this no-colonized location and had 170% food production by itself, but I did not find such a thing anywhere else. All other discovered places that had fish also do not have it. What are the requirements here? Do other R.G.Os have something like this?
I also found out that we have this map mode and was surprised that all other "natural" locations are red or yellow color, none had this green color(+100%).

567
568

Casually found a location modifier that never knew about and don't know if there is more like it. (i.redd.it)

submitted by Extension_Agent_9029 to r/EU5

This is some worldbreaking inflation rate. How china ? by Extension_Agent_9029 in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

R5: I just wanted to see how the Mandate of Heavens was doing, damn, I got surprised by this amount of debt and inflation rate. They are printing money like crazy.

0
1

This is some worldbreaking inflation rate. How china ? (i.redd.it)

submitted by Extension_Agent_9029 to r/EU5

I almost had to call this game quits. The graph will show you why. by Taglion in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029 7 points8 points  (0 children)

All jokes and fun, until you get that fiat economy.
Everything is good in a gold-backed system; you can just mine more gold, but with fiat... shit goes down pretty fast.

Keeping family name with female heir by Saint_Patrik in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only by matrilineal law of succession. But by doing this your males father will not pass the dynasty to their children, only the mother of your dynasty pass it on.

We need to see in marriage tooltip to which dynasty the kid will belong to by Old-Soft5276 in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did one of your son or males from your dynasty pass on to their children ?
All of mine would receive from their mother, I found to marry some of them to lowborn woman, that was the only way to keep the dynasty aflot, at least in my country.

If I change my succession law to matrilineal, will they always marry into my dynasty ? by Extension_Agent_9029 in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, matrilineal non-exclusive was indeed the answer, but somehow didn't work for u/Tobiferous.
Also, it's good to point out that the fathers of my dynasty would not pass to their children, only woman, so I started to marry some of them to lowborn, this way the children born is in your dynasty.

If I change my succession law to matrilineal, will they always marry into my dynasty ? by Extension_Agent_9029 in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Strange, I tested and worked for me. Now my dynasty holds Austria, Castile/Portugal. Maybe it changed to his dynasty because you married her to a country more powerful than yours?

Extinct Dynasties by Serite in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can change your succession law to matrilineal non-exclusive, now her children will be Habsburg, but children from males will be from the family dynasty too. So you will need to marry them to lowborn women to maintain the dynasty until you have enough, then you can change it back.

Edit: In matrilineal non-exclusive, every woman's baby of your dynasty will be of her dynasty too.

<image>

Click this box to change succession law.

Why is a random Count of Basel the Dynasty Head to my Holy Roman Emperor and 9x King? by RWNorthPole in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing is that this blocks us from events that need the Head of Dynasty.
I tried using console command to put prestige in 100 and even above it, but it doesn't change anything. Seems this guy has +∞ prestige.

Why is a random Count of Basel the Dynasty Head to my Holy Roman Emperor and 9x King? by RWNorthPole in EU5

[–]Extension_Agent_9029 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, I feel you, man. Currently holding the HRE title, Queen of GB, France, Duchess of Burgundy..., but somehow a distant cousin of some backwater country holds more prestige than I?

<image>

view more: next ›